I also read somewhere that the demand is relatively inelastic and isn't changing too much at the present.
Worldwide or domestic?
It comes down to one thing; the energy policy in this country is bad. Its dictated by people with no acumen on the subject, nor any desire to do the right thing.
Regular 87 octane. With 10% to 12% ethanol mixed in (Chicagoland does this).Are you talking about regular octane or 93? I noticed a plateau a little here too, but my fill ups are routinely 50 dollars or so. ...
What is the "right thing"? Is the "right thing" for the short term the same as the "right thing" in the long term?
If a renewable standard the right way to go? I don't know. I do know that incresing the fraction of electricity from renewable is necessary looking at the long term availibiltily and reliability.
The true long term energy solution isn't supply based, but demand based. Overall energy demand must decrease to a level that is sustainable over the long term.
Regular 87 octane. With 10% to 12% ethanol mixed in (Chicagoland does this).
It had been $4.29 for at least a week at the Speedway and Citgo by work. Needed gas last night, and was shocked when the pump read $4.45.
Thought about snapping a cell pic to upload to Twitter/Facebook... but then I didn't want to become a poster child for WhiteWhine.com.![]()
Gas here still is E10 , or 10% ethanol. So its 12% out there? And more expensive? Your paying more for 87 than I am for 93 to fill my car.
You have my deepest sympathies.
My opinion is that the right thing is to help rather than worsen our economy. Pursuing alternative energy is expensive, so why should those costs be placed upon the people who are already struggling? On the flip side, you have Google exploring solar and wind, but they are absorbing those costs . I have no issue with private enterprises seeking alternative solutions - but why should the public be forced to front the bill for scams like corn ethanol?
A true sustainable energy plan is probably a bit of an oxymoron. In a world with limited resources, are any energy sources we use truly sustainable? Maybe if human population was very low, and we were using woody biomass at a rate it grew back than it would be, but we aren’t. Our population is still growing, and all the low hanging fruit ( who hits oil in their backyards anymore?) are gone. It’s the laws of physics. Eventually we will run out, and I think our energy plan needs to be aware of the physical limitations of what we have. So maybe, I am saying the same thing you are? Remember , im no economist so the lingo loses me a bit.
"To help and not hurt the economy" also depends on the time scale you are looking at. The political expedient solution is to look for short term patches for long term problems. That's the irony of the whole situation, if the US had truly committed to and invested in alternative energy sources for oil and other fossil fuels 40 years ago we may not be in this problem of $5 gas now. We may still be in a similar situation, but until we commit ourselves to changing our behaviors that got us into this mess, we are not going to get out of it. The problem of our reliance on cheep energy isn't going to be solved by having cheep energy, it is just going to delay the real pain.
A sustainable energy police is one that can include all current types of energy (including fossil fuels), it just need to have a "glide path" towards reaching the end goal. Better to have a plan for switching over to renewable and phasing out fossil fuels over the next 50-75 years then it is to continually deal with the volatility in international oil prices.
Gas here still is E10 , or 10% ethanol. So its 12% out there? And more expensive? Your paying more for 87 than I am for 93 to fill my car.
You have my deepest sympathies.
I think we should remove all energy subsides and start over.
Any invention or technology that was born of NASA and the space program comes to mind.have there ever been inventions/products which have been assisted by government spending ( meaning it was too costly to bring to market initially) which now is a staple in our society? Its 8am and I can’t think of any!
Any invention or technology that was born of NASA and the space program comes to mind.
I don't think he said anything about relaxing the environmental/emissions regulations....Until the rivers catch fire, the air can't be breathed, and the rural areas stop receiving electrical service since it's too costly to serve them.
Until there's a mechanism to charge/credit people for all externalities they cause, good and bad, then the markets will not always be right. Government regulation didn't arise in a vacuum; some very powerful people tried to get away with some serious **** back in the good ole' days.
I don't think he said anything about relaxing the environmental/emissions regulations....![]()
I was under the impression that he was just suggesting doing away with all subsidies that favor one type of energy over another, so a less efficient/practical technology isn't used simply because it is being propped up by the government. I don't think he is advocating letting energy companies have a free-for-all with no regulations whatsoever. I'm not big on government regulating everything and even I can see that it would be bad idea to do that.Abundant and produced cheap are the keywords he used. That strikes me as a "market always good; gubmint always bad" argument.
If I read too much in to that, then my bad. But I've heard this spiel from other people before, and that's where it always ends up.