Re: 2nd Term, Part VI: Burnin' down the House
The hubris on the right is amazing. Yes, the GOP has drawn favorable districts. That DOES NOT make their re-election assured.
In 1992 Dems drew the districts. They lost the House two years later.
In 2002 and 2004 (thank you Tom DeLay) Republicans drew the districts. They lost the House two years later.
If your party's brand is swirling the bowl, and you represent a district where Romney won between 50-55%, you're not safe. You should win, but you could lose depending on who's running against you. All those Northern Republicans, of which there's quite a few, now have a bulls eye on their backs. Why more of these people didn't follow Peter King's lead, purely for self preservation, is beyond me.
Teabaggers in the deep South may very well be safe, but they could end up being safe in the minority in a few years (for the record I don't see the Dems winning the House in 14 but in 16 yes in a Hillary vs Rand Paul/Ted Cruz blowout).
Regarding whether this happens again in a few months, I've seen it suggested that the Dems will next push for a deadline right in the middle of election season. I've also seen that they will bring up their own wish list given what's happened in the court of public opinion. Not sure the GOP wants to have this fight in 2014. All things being even it should be a good year for them. Start reminding the public why they dislike them so much and that might change (see 1998).
The hubris on the right is amazing. Yes, the GOP has drawn favorable districts. That DOES NOT make their re-election assured.
In 1992 Dems drew the districts. They lost the House two years later.
In 2002 and 2004 (thank you Tom DeLay) Republicans drew the districts. They lost the House two years later.
If your party's brand is swirling the bowl, and you represent a district where Romney won between 50-55%, you're not safe. You should win, but you could lose depending on who's running against you. All those Northern Republicans, of which there's quite a few, now have a bulls eye on their backs. Why more of these people didn't follow Peter King's lead, purely for self preservation, is beyond me.
Teabaggers in the deep South may very well be safe, but they could end up being safe in the minority in a few years (for the record I don't see the Dems winning the House in 14 but in 16 yes in a Hillary vs Rand Paul/Ted Cruz blowout).
Regarding whether this happens again in a few months, I've seen it suggested that the Dems will next push for a deadline right in the middle of election season. I've also seen that they will bring up their own wish list given what's happened in the court of public opinion. Not sure the GOP wants to have this fight in 2014. All things being even it should be a good year for them. Start reminding the public why they dislike them so much and that might change (see 1998).