What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

To the contrary, I don't think most of the country has done a full 180 on gay marriage. I just think it's one of those issues that a simple majority of us have decided doesn't affect us personally and is a waste of time to debate, so therefore, "Let 'em have marriage, and everything that comes with it." We're starting to witness this same effect with pot as well.

Which is GOOD. Laws should be based on what the state has the power to restrict people from doing, not whether we personally approve of that behavior. The classic injustice of laws like the gay marriage ban is they elevate "I don't like it" to the status of "the state forbids it."
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

I often talk to people who, despite being publicly OK with gay marriage, still privately think two men passionately kissing is "weird". I merely attribute this to open homosexuality being new and unfamiliar to many. Give it 20 years, and very few people are going to think twice about it.

The people at my work feel this way because the gays they met growing up in small hyper-Christian communities were terrified of the pervasive hatred and closeted. This is one of the many social waves that starts in large cosmopolitan cities where you can't avoid meeting all sorts of different people and then meanders down the population density gradient to eventually spill out onto the broad countryside. It's exactly the same as interracial marriage.

In 20 years the people who screech about it today will still be screeching about it. Just like feminism, it will provoke a truly hysterical backlash from the true, hardcore herpa-derps, and they will pass it along to their next generation through their churches and home schools. The best that can be said of that permanent intellectual and moral underclass is it appears to be shrinking, but I doubt it ever drops below 25%.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

"We have a surplus: we must cut taxes!"

"Oops, that's a deficit: we must cut taxes!"
As you know from past discussions, I'm ok with moderate tax increases, in concert with spending cuts, to balance the federal budget long term. So I'm not sure what you're talking about here?
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

I would think that there has been a massive swing in the judiciary.
There certainly has been some swing in the judiciary. Maybe not as much as in the general public, but it's certainly there. It's those activist judges!
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

There certainly has been some swing in the judiciary. Maybe not as much as in the general public, but it's certainly there. It's those activist judges!

Easy enough to test.

Those who answered "Engaging in homosexual behavior" with "is morally wrong" dropped from 82% in 1987 to 50% in 2014. I would call a 32% swing significant.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

As you know from past discussions, I'm ok with moderate tax increases, in concert with spending cuts, to balance the federal budget long term. So I'm not sure what you're talking about here?

Your statement that I was responding to was:

But the Dems' conveniently timed flip-flop on gay marriage, en masse, is the most obvious party wide flip flop on an issue for political gain I can recall.

I was pointing out that the GOP's flip flop on the rationale for tax cuts was also epic, and as transparently laughable.

BTW, I agree with you that the Dems on gay marriage was a political flip flop. They happen all the time; this one just happened to be magnified because Obama's "evolution" was so obviously craven. Nobody who graduates with honors from a tier one university is against gay marriage unless they're somewhere over the rainbow in religious fundamentalism. Educated non-fundies who say they are against it are obviously lying for political reasons to appeal to the nightcrawlers back home.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

Easy enough to test.

Those who answered "Engaging in homosexual behavior" with "is morally wrong" dropped from 82% in 1987 to 50% in 2014. I would call a 32% swing significant.
I'm not sure what that poll is being cited for, as I think we agree that there has been a big swing in public perceptions. Poll is interesting nonetheless, but not surprising.


The poll shows people now are more on board with pot, homosexuality, living together out of wedlock, drinking alcohol, and looking at porn. Sounds about right. Interestingly, the only one to go the other way is abortion, with 5% more people saying having one is morally wrong.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

50% think it's still morally wrong?

"gross " is one thing but really, morally wrong?
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

50% think it's still morally wrong?

"gross " is one thing but really, morally wrong?

Most people's ethical universe reaches barely beyond the tip of their own nose. If they don't like something then it's "immoral" and should probably be illegal.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

I'm not sure what that poll is being cited for, as I think we agree that there has been a big swing in public perceptions. Poll is interesting nonetheless, but not surprising.

I'm citing it in reference to your claim that the gen pop hasn't progressed on this as far as judges. While you may be correct, it isn't as if the average citizen hasn't come a long way too.

I was surprised by the porn number being so high, but I suppose that might be conflating objections from the far right (God is obsessed with your wiener) and the far left (if you jack off to a photo you're oppressing the sisterhood).
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

I'm citing it in reference to your claim that the gen pop hasn't progressed on this as far as judges. While you may be correct, it isn't as if the average citizen hasn't come a long way too.

I was surprised by the porn number being so high, but I suppose that might be conflating objections from the far right (God is obsessed with your wiener) and the far left (if you jack off to a photo you're oppressing the sisterhood).
You misread my post. I said judges had moved, but the public likely more.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part IX - How Lame is my Duck

Oh, man I hope the 24 hour news machine runs this into the ground. So much fun.

MSNBC: Runs story 24/7
CNN: Doesn't run it; not a lost plane
Fox: Runs story 24/7, changing name from McConnell to Clinton
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top