What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

FlagDUDE08 said:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/11/18/voter-fraud-in-wood-county.html
Click to expand...

This article tells a very different story than your initial post which indicated that hundreds of thousands illegal immigrants voted. The basic charge in this article is that in one county there are 104,461 registered voters when there shouldn't be more than 100,000 registered. The article goes on to say that this is probably due to college graduates who were registered in the county but moved and did not update their voter registration. There is no mention of illegal immigrants voting.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

FlagDUDE08 said:
Wasn't just Ohio. http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had.html

It isn't limited to the huff-and-puffers, either: http://www.gadsdentimes.com/article/20120830/NEWS/120839986
Click to expand...

A local citizen explains the cause of the St Lucie County discrepancy:

This county had a two-card ballot. Some people voted for office holders (one card), some for initiatives (other card) and some both. The total votes number indicates the number of vote cards received.

Add up the totals for any given decision and you will see a voter turnout of around 70.4% (that value I got using presidential vote numbers and the 175,554 registered voter number YoungOwl mentions).
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

FlagDUDE08 said:
Wasn't just Ohio. http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had.html

It isn't limited to the huff-and-puffers, either: http://www.gadsdentimes.com/article/20120830/NEWS/120839986
Click to expand...

In the Gasden, AL election it looks like there was a problem but it was not in the Presidential election. The date of the article is August 30, 2012.

Strange looking into voter registration, turnout in Uniontown

By Dana Beyerle
Times Montgomery Bureau



Published: Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 7:13 p.m.

Last Modified: Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 7:14 p.m.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

trucker said:
A local citizen explains the cause of the St Lucie County discrepancy:

This county had a two-card ballot. Some people voted for office holders (one card), some for initiatives (other card) and some both. The total votes number indicates the number of vote cards received.

Add up the totals for any given decision and you will see a voter turnout of around 70.4% (that value I got using presidential vote numbers and the 175,554 registered voter number YoungOwl mentions).
Click to expand...

It's a CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!1111!!!!!!

e9f32e95b43ce94fdde76648447905d7.jpg
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

trucker said:
In the Gasden, AL election it looks like there was a problem but it was not in the Presidential election. The date of the article is August 30, 2012.

Strange looking into voter registration, turnout in Uniontown

By Dana Beyerle
Times Montgomery Bureau



Published: Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 7:13 p.m.

Last Modified: Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 7:14 p.m.
Click to expand...


Don't confuse him with facts. He's trying to build a narrative.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

Shocking.

Another Fox Voter Fraud Story Dies

Seventeen months after Fox News became briefly fixated on Republican claims that hundreds of dead voters had cast ballots in South Carolina, those allegations have been completely debunked by an investigation by law enforcement that found no evidence of voter fraud.

Fox frequently pushes dubious allegations of widespread voter fraud that fall apart under scrutiny.

The South Carolina "dead voter" claim sprang from testimony from Kevin Schwedo, the director of the state's Department of Motor Vehicles, who said on January 11, 2012, that more than 950 residents were recorded as having cast a vote after their reported death date. Schwedo made clear that this could have been the result of data errors or voters dying after casting an absentee ballot, but the state's Republicans, led by Attorney General Alan Wilson, seized on the report as evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Wilson took his campaign to Fox News, where he received a platform for softball interviews from several anchors. The network used the "dead voter" story to promote South Carolina's voter ID law, which had been blocked by the Justice Department.

Again, these claims were always dubious - deceased voter fraud claims are often revealed as unfounded, the result of data errors or other explanations.

Indeed, on July 3 the public release of an investigation by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) provided the answer we anticipated: No voter fraud was found, no charges filed. As of noon E.T. on July 8, Fox had not reported on those findings.

--

Hutchins explained the result of this effort by the GOP and right-wing media -- which he labeled the state's biggest waste of public funds for 2012-- was that the investigation "hammer[ed] away at the time and resources of the understaffed and underfunded State Election Commission -- even when that agency has repeatedly said there are no documented cases of someone impersonating another at the polls in the Palmetto State."

One would expect a network as obsessed with state spending as Fox to have something to say about that sort of waste. But so far they've been silent.
Click to expand...
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

FlagDUDE08 said:
Let us know when this information comes from a credible news source.
Click to expand...

What? You don't like media matters? Here, read the report yourself.

<div data-configid="0/3946582" style="width: 525px; height: 525px;" class="issuuembed"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//e.issuu.com/embed.js" async="true"></script>
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

FlagDUDE08 said:
Can't see Javascript from here. But hey, if "Faux News" isn't good enough for you...
Click to expand...

The report is available. All you have to do is click the link. Then you can see that once again reports of massive voter fraud conducted by an army of zombies voting for Democrats were nothing but figments of a warped imagination. Oddly enough, the highly reputable people at Faux "News" haven't seen fit to report it. Wonder why.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

Priceless said:
The report is available. All you have to do is click the link. Then you can see that once again reports of massive voter fraud conducted by an army of zombies voting for Democrats were nothing but figments of a warped imagination. Oddly enough, the highly reputable people at Faux "News" haven't seen fit to report it. Wonder why.
Click to expand...

Michael Bay was closer to the point when he made Pearl Harbor than you were to getting the point I was trying to make.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part 5: Big Brotha

FlagDUDE08 said:
Michael Bay was closer to the point when he made Pearl Harbor than you were to getting the point I was trying to make.
Click to expand...

I got your point. It just seemed like the conversation could be advanced more quickly if I looked past it. Obviously I was wrong. Like a teenager in a high school debate class, you need every point addressed. Fine. Faux "News" is not a credible source. They went to court for (and won) the right not to be constricted to tell the truth in their reports and their chairman or whatever he calls himself admitted that he views Democrats as "the other side" which doesn't make for very unbiased reporting.

Now, as I said, the report itself is available for reading. No pesky news organizations to sway opinion one way or the other. When you have a chance, you might want to read it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top