What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2026 Elections: To the Midterms and Beyond!

No one is advocating for eliminating borders and in fact they were never open at any point in time.

btw the vast majority of illegals in the country are there by way of overstayed visas.
But that is in the DSA platform.

And i believe you are correct about the majority overstaying their visas. The DSA platform advocates for 100% amnesty regardless of status. For people like this wouldn't it make more sense to figure out an improved system to determine who can stay / have their visas extended / possible path to citizenship?
 
I understand that one side gets away with them and will still get elected regularly while the other side gets scolded for having a fraction of the extremism of the first. The double standard has been in place and been bullshiat for decades.
Put another way, I abhor the designated hitter and agree with Crash Davis that there should be a constitutional amendment outlawing it. I still want the Cubs to employ it so long as their opponents use it, however.
 
On what topic? Surely on any given issue you should be able to envision a position somewhere between the far left and far right?

Immigration for example - is there really nothing you can picture in between "zero borders, 100% amnesty" and "masked undercover agents murdering citizens"?
I wanna know what you consider a "moderate' position is. Because as I said previously, I suspect, like Brent, it's just Republican positions, just without all the chaos, hatred, and casual racism.
 
But that is in the DSA platform.

And i believe you are correct about the majority overstaying their visas. The DSA platform advocates for 100% amnesty regardless of status. For people like this wouldn't it make more sense to figure out an improved system to determine who can stay / have their visas extended / possible path to citizenship?
We've tried that. Donnie and the Republicans keep torpedoing it. Or haven't you been paying attention?
 
I wanna know what you consider a "moderate' position is. Because as I said previously, I suspect, like Brent, it's just Republican positions, just without all the chaos, hatred, and casual racism.
How about something along the lines of - borders are more secure to reduce illegal crossings but at the same time system is revised to increase immigration for those who will be productive members of society while also identifying and keeping out those who may be here to do harm. For those already here, figure out a path to permanent status and/or citizenship for those that qualify (meaning you are here being productive). And sorry, if you are here illegally and you are committing crimes then you are going to be deported (but we are doing it in a manner that isn't terrorizing those here legally or on a path to extended visas/permanent status).
 
Last edited:
How about something along the lines of - borders are more secure to reduce illegal crossings but at the same time system is revised to increase immigration for those who will be productive members of society while also identifying and keeping out those who may be here to do harm. For those already here, figure out a path to permanent status and/or citizenship for those that qualify (meaning you are here being productive). And sorry, if you are here illegally and you are committing crimes then you are going to be deported (but we are doing it in a manner that isn't terrorizing those here legally or on a path to extended visas/permanent status).
Which is *exactly* what we could have had, (Time.com) but 77.3 Million Americans wanted this:
images
 
Which is *exactly* what we could have had, (Time.com) but 77.3 Million Americans wanted this:
images
I voted for Harris - and supported the bipartisan bill.
Are you saying that since it didn't get through you think we should go for no borders / 100% amnesty? Or was the bipartisan bill too "moderate" for you to begin with and you wanted no borders all along?
Also, in fairness, it is untrue that everyone who voted for Trump in 2024 wanted this version of ICE.
 
On the heels of some not-great polling news yesterday, Stevens just straight up came out and said El-Sayed hates Jewish Americans.

 
On the heels of some not-great polling news yesterday, Stevens just straight up came out and said El-Sayed hates Jewish Americans.

She is a disgusting little gremlin.
 
I voted for Harris - and supported the bipartisan bill.
Are you saying that since it didn't get through you think we should go for no borders / 100% amnesty? Or was the bipartisan bill too "moderate" for you to begin with and you wanted no borders all along?
Also, in fairness, it is untrue that everyone who voted for Trump in 2024 wanted this version of ICE.
You keep arguing that there are no absolutes, but then keep making absolutes.

Were the Hatians also eating dogs and cats in Ohio?

Why is it okay for one side to spout insane shit and then have water carriers try to man-splain it away as just locker talk and they didn't mean it, and the other party gets held at gunpoint for even suggesting a bumper sticker slogan?
 
Back
Top