What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2021 World Championships

Always good to see US vrs Canada but everyone knows this is just the "pre-season" game and largely meaningless outside of pride - the 'real' game will be in the championship.

I really hope with the strength group B has shown (especially Czech - wow) and the clear separation between the NA and rest of group A teams, that the tournament format goes to a more traditional "pool A" and "pool B" with the US in one pool, Canada in the other. Standard pool play then the top 2 in each pool go to the 'medal' rounds while the bottom 2 in each pool go to the "relegation" rounds. 3rd place winners can play a best 2-of-3 to figure out who finishes #5 and #6 in the tournament. Would make for a much more exciting tournament and give teams like the Czech a legit chance to bounce out Switzerland/Russia. As of right now, it is hard to get too excited for this US-Canada match up knowing it is just a pride game, and then watch both the US and Canada spank their respective Group B counter parts (Japan and Germany). I think Czech might have a chance for a win over Finland (was last worlds the aberration or this one - it looked like for a bit there they could be on par with the US/Canada but look to have fallen back to the mean) but even so don't think it moves them up enough in the rankings to become #5 in the world. I think Czech would give a beat-down on the Swiss and could probably beat Russia too but we won't get to find out and won't for at least a few years at best in the current format.
Some great points here. Sawa lot of the Czech girls at selects in Balzno italy about 5 years ago they won the tournament in ot.
Remember Finland doesn't have Raty playing for them this tournament she will definitely be on their Olympic team.She makes a huge difference.
The us looks old. Like they did in the 2014 Olympics. The Younger lines could keep up with Canada. This could all change in the loser out round.
 
Remember Finland doesn't have Raty playing for them this tournament she will definitely be on their Olympic team.She makes a huge difference.
The goalies that Finland does have for this event have done enough so that the Finns have the best save % in Pool A. Coming through the Pool A schedule will give their team an edge in defending in the quarterfinal against the Czechs. Playing Canada is better preparation than playing Hungary and Denmark.

As for the USA being old in 2014, the only skater on the roster in 2014 older than 26 who wasn't also on the 2018 Olympic roster was Julie Chu. The goalies were younger in 2018, but the rest of the roster didn't turn over that much. I'd say that the current roster has more new blood amongst the skaters than the 2018 roster did.
 
Last edited:
Breaking Down the USA Roster and Canada Roster
Number of Colleges Representative Canada 15 USA 9
Break down of Conference Representative
Canada ECAC 16 Players WCHA 9 Players HEA 2 Canada 1
USA WCHA 16 Players 6 HEA 1 CHA 1 ECAC

FYI Read into this what you want if anything
 
The Czechs should be playing for a chance to bump out the Swiss or Russians. The fact they dominated group B and yet have no chance to play the bottom of group A with a chance to 'relegate' them to B is a major flaw in how the tournament is setup. Further, TBH, while good hockey is good hockey, the fact is all the current group A match-ups have lacked any urgency in the preliminary round since they all make it to the 'finals' - there is nothing to play for and nothing to lose outside of pride since no one can be 'relegated' and all make the playoffs. I really hope the format changes next year to make this preliminary rounds meaningful. With 10 teams, where 2 dominate and the other 8 should be pretty competitive screams for going to a normal "pool" play format. Make every game mean something.
 
If the concern with regular pool play is that we would go back to seeing some 15-0 games again like in the early days, the format could go where the top 2 in group A get a "bye" into the medal round, bottom 3 in A play the top 3 in B for the other 2 medal round spots and 5-8 final tournament positioning, while the bottom 2 of B play to see who gets relegated. This would also make the preliminary rounds mean something in A, and would avoid the "US-Hungary" match up which might not be fun for anyone involved (either playing or watching)
 
Tough day for the US overall but #3 and #4 for the US...Yikes.

#3 really left her teammate (#5) in a tough spot when she did the bc default which is to always pinch in from the point. Left #5 to contend with a Canada 2 on 1 and then didn't hustle back to tie up the 2nd player on the 2 on 1 who deposited the rebound into the back of the net.

#4 looked a little more like deer in the headlights than the hype we heard before the step up in competition with Canada.
 
Thinking about the rematch and I think the good news for the Americans is that there is no way that was the best they have. Rewatched the 5 goals against and here are my observations :

1- Should Joel Johnson yell at the refs a bit more?. I think there is a time and place for it. Not Pasi M levels of yelling or anything, just something. Prior to Canada’s first goal, Zumwinkle got hauled down by Thompson shortly after a zone exit....no call, play continued and eventually Canada got Filliers line on the ice and their first goal.

2 - there were 16 skaters on the US that averaged shift lengths of 50 seconds or higher. need to address that especially with the young ones. Canada had not one skater with an average that high. Some of this is due to Canada’s forecheck but not all. On the second goal Curl, Compher and Zumwinkle had the puck in the offensive zone. Instead of peeling off and getting the Decker line out there, they let Daoust break out, approach the offensive zone blue line, do a massive circle (zum stuck with her but by this point her linemates
were changing so when Daoust rolled off Zum she was free to give a nice feed to wide open Clark on the neutral zone wall. The forwards had left the building so Bozek challenged Clark but didn’t touch her, which allowed Clark to feed the puck to Fast who took 3 shots on net, eventually scoring a goal. Harvey should have been beating the heck out of Fast but as someone else said, a bit more deer in head lights this game. Decker, coyne, and Knight took the minus on that but had no chance whatsoever to remedy anything by the time they got on the ice. Even when Bozek arrived on the scene where Fast was hacking away, no physicality, so unlike her.


3- I thought a key to this game was going to be the vets keeping things steady. They struggled tho. Reality is a bunch of young players and a new head coach. there’s going to be some nerves and the superstar vets need to take charge. On the first Rattray goal, Canada’s third goal, it was Deckers line and Keller and Barnes on the ice with the puck in Canada’s zone. Barnes pinched to help Coyne on the wall, maybe she had to since both Fast and Rattray were closing in on Coyne, but you also expect Coyne to get that puck fully in the zone on a zone entry. No question that if this team expects to win gold that line needs to be better against Canada. They still got more shots than any other line, historically they are amazing and I assume they’ll be better next game.

4- 4th goal was 18 27 and 13 getting victimized again. Canada’s third line penned them in the zone and then they (and Barnes and Harvey) had to deal with Canada’s first line. I don’t know how you handle Jenner on the wall behind the net when you’re fresh, let alone when you are exhausted.

5- it was Jenner winning a puck on the wall AGAIN on the pk, and feeding Nurse who skated down the ice and sniped on a cold Hensley. Jenner was a factor in 3 goals I think.

Nothing the US can do but get back to work. Of the new players I like Roque, Murphy, Zumwinkle. As exciting as the future might be for Harvey, Dunne and Harmon have a ton more experience. Harvey was third in ice time the other day among defenders. Maybe due to not being able to get off the ice but that surprised me considering she was listed as 7th d.

2 more games until they might meet again. Having witnessed this, and it was so needed, its going to be more painful now if Canada does not win gold. For now though the quarters. Waiting to see if Poulin is back, and what Johnson tries with his lines.
 
Thinking about the rematch and I think the good news for the Americans is that there is no way that was the best they have. Rewatched the 5 goals against and here are my observations :

1- Should Joel Johnson yell at the refs a bit more?. I think there is a time and place for it. Not Pasi M levels of yelling or anything, just something. Prior to Canada’s first goal, Zumwinkle got hauled down by Thompson shortly after a zone exit....no call, play continued and eventually Canada got Filliers line on the ice and their first goal.

2 - there were 16 skaters on the US that averaged shift lengths of 50 seconds or higher. need to address that especially with the young ones. Canada had not one skater with an average that high. Some of this is due to Canada’s forecheck but not all. On the second goal Curl, Compher and Zumwinkle had the puck in the offensive zone. Instead of peeling off and getting the Decker line out there, they let Daoust break out, approach the offensive zone blue line, do a massive circle (zum stuck with her but by this point her linemates
were changing so when Daoust rolled off Zum she was free to give a nice feed to wide open Clark on the neutral zone wall. The forwards had left the building so Bozek challenged Clark but didn’t touch her, which allowed Clark to feed the puck to Fast who took 3 shots on net, eventually scoring a goal. Harvey should have been beating the heck out of Fast but as someone else said, a bit more deer in head lights this game. Decker, coyne, and Knight took the minus on that but had no chance whatsoever to remedy anything by the time they got on the ice. Even when Bozek arrived on the scene where Fast was hacking away, no physicality, so unlike her.


3- I thought a key to this game was going to be the vets keeping things steady. They struggled tho. Reality is a bunch of young players and a new head coach. there’s going to be some nerves and the superstar vets need to take charge. On the first Rattray goal, Canada’s third goal, it was Deckers line and Keller and Barnes on the ice with the puck in Canada’s zone. Barnes pinched to help Coyne on the wall, maybe she had to since both Fast and Rattray were closing in on Coyne, but you also expect Coyne to get that puck fully in the zone on a zone entry. No question that if this team expects to win gold that line needs to be better against Canada. They still got more shots than any other line, historically they are amazing and I assume they’ll be better next game.

4- 4th goal was 18 27 and 13 getting victimized again. Canada’s third line penned them in the zone and then they (and Barnes and Harvey) had to deal with Canada’s first line. I don’t know how you handle Jenner on the wall behind the net when you’re fresh, let alone when you are exhausted.

5- it was Jenner winning a puck on the wall AGAIN on the pk, and feeding Nurse who skated down the ice and sniped on a cold Hensley. Jenner was a factor in 3 goals I think.

Nothing the US can do but get back to work. Of the new players I like Roque, Murphy, Zumwinkle. As exciting as the future might be for Harvey, Dunne and Harmon have a ton more experience. Harvey was third in ice time the other day among defenders. Maybe due to not being able to get off the ice but that surprised me considering she was listed as 7th d.

2 more games until they might meet again. Having witnessed this, and it was so needed, its going to be more painful now if Canada does not win gold. For now though the quarters. Waiting to see if Poulin is back, and what Johnson tries with his lines.

Is it time to address the elephant in the room...USA goaltending? Hindsight is 20/20 but I think a couple of those goals could’ve been stopped. Yes, Canada was absolutely outplaying USA, but goalies have to raise their games vs Canada if they’re going to stay in the game. On the other hand, I think ARD had some good saves (and a lucky paddle) but had the advantage of not challenged nearly as much as Cavallini and Hensley. Maybe USA goalies suffered from not being challenged in the first couple of games, but that’s nothing new. Bottom line is that every facet of USA’s game needs to improve the next time they play Canada.
 
Is it time to address the elephant in the room...USA goaltending? Hindsight is 20/20 but I think a couple of those goals could’ve been stopped. Yes, Canada was absolutely outplaying USA, but goalies have to raise their games vs Canada if they’re going to stay in the game. On the other hand, I think ARD had some good saves (and a lucky paddle) but had the advantage of not challenged nearly as much as Cavallini and Hensley. Maybe USA goalies suffered from not being challenged in the first couple of games, but that’s nothing new. Bottom line is that every facet of USA’s game needs to improve the next time they play Canada.

would you consider putting Frankel in net or is it too late in the tourney to do that? ARD came into the last game with 78% tourney save percentage so I haven’t been too focused on the US goalies, haha.
 
Has Japan ever scored against the US? I mean this game is not in doubt due to the offensive firepower of the US, but they already gave up 2 to the Japanese???
 
Has Japan ever scored against the US? I mean this game is not in doubt due to the offensive firepower of the US, but they already gave up 2 to the Japanese???
According to what they said on the broadcast those were Japan's first ever goals scored on the U.S. in three prior Worlds meetings.
 
Any word on Kelly Pannek? Unfortunately she took a very hard shot to her head off the stick of one of her teammates and to the best of my knowledge did not see any icetime the rest of the way. Sure hope she's OK.
 
Finland defeated Czech 1-0, despite being outshot so semis are Canada Switzerland, and US Finland.

On US’ goals against yesterday one was a bad line change. I don’t know what happened on the other but Keller was the 5th skater back into the zone while Scamurra tried to play defense. Lacey Eden, a 4th line rookie, averaging 59 second shifts (along with 12 others over 50 seconds)! Not to take anything away from Canada’s butt kicking the other day, but the US is making some simple mistakes, that are uncharacteristic of them.

Nice to see Roque get an assist yesterday. On to Finland.
 
Back
Top