purpleinnebraska
Well-known member
It was a much different BU team than we played out there last year. This team seemed much more willing to block shots and fight for pucks. I think they’ll be fine this year.
Great win, Beavs!
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
- Thread starter MissThundercat
- Start date
It was a much different BU team than we played out there last year. This team seemed much more willing to block shots and fight for pucks. I think they’ll be fine this year.
Great win, Beavs!
purpleinnebraska
Well-known member
Are you getting good looks and no luck, or no looks?
UAHStatman
Registered User
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
Few looks...again. We've been outshot an average of 43-15 in the first three games. Early, yes, but concerning.
Few looks...again. We've been outshot an average of 43-15 in the first three games. Early, yes, but concerning.
UAHStatman
Registered User
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
I did a little yesterday on my Roku with the Ferris State and Michigan Tech games, and they both seemed to work well for me.
I did a little yesterday on my Roku with the Ferris State and Michigan Tech games, and they both seemed to work well for me.
FadeToBlack&Gold
8647
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
Seems there was quite a bit of complaining about the UAF feed last night, but _airbanks seemed to acknowledge it was on their side.
Seems there was quite a bit of complaining about the UAF feed last night, but _airbanks seemed to acknowledge it was on their side.
Laker Dude
Registered User
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
All the games I tried worked fine for me. Quality seemed the same as last year. The set up last year seemed easier as far as finding games to re-play them on demand. Unless I am missing where to find the replayed games.
All the games I tried worked fine for me. Quality seemed the same as last year. The set up last year seemed easier as far as finding games to re-play them on demand. Unless I am missing where to find the replayed games.
Andrew J Carter
New member
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
Congrats Cats!
Congrats Beavers at going 1-0-1 this weekend against UND. Went into an angry, hostile environment and hung tough. Excellent Defense. Gave up only 2 goals for the weekend.
Nice sweep Mankato.
Congrats Cats!
Congrats Beavers at going 1-0-1 this weekend against UND. Went into an angry, hostile environment and hung tough. Excellent Defense. Gave up only 2 goals for the weekend.
Nice sweep Mankato.
Last edited:
Squarebanks
New member
Streaming it tonight and it’s been good. Better than last year, IMO. At least for UAF.
Squarebanks
New member
The same larger-budget schools that forced UAA to pay thousands in travel costs each year?JFC no wonder Cobb was cursing at them!
Make no mistake, it was all about money. The bigger programs wanted to partner with bigger programs to increase the revenue pie. UAA, UAF, Tech, Ferris, et al didn’t bring enough $$$ and eyeballs to the table. Follow the money.
It wasn’t so much about travel like some claim. Every season since the split, at least one if not two NCHC teams has made the trip to either Fairbanks or Anchorage. I think Duluth and Miami are the only two teams who haven’t made the trip to AK since the formation of the NCHC.
FadeToBlack&Gold
8647
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
They wanted to increase the revenue pie, and they also hated having to share tournament profits with schools that they felt were not pulling their weight and spending at a level necessary to field a competitive team. Which was an absolutely correct assessment of UAA and Tech at the time.
They wanted to increase the revenue pie, and they also hated having to share tournament profits with schools that they felt were not pulling their weight and spending at a level necessary to field a competitive team. Which was an absolutely correct assessment of UAA and Tech at the time.
manurespreader
Still upright
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
I used the FLO roku channel and watched several different games, however I had signed up via my laptop. So now it's not clear if I got the yearly fee or if I am paying the weekly or game to game fee. I do think the league as a whole is better than last year.
JohnsonsJerseys
Michigan Tech Fan
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
"A lot of credit is due to Brian Faison at North Dakota. He deserves a ton of credit for putting ego aside and doing what’s right for the league."
Not hard to tell the article was written by a Whioux fan. I guess UND just forgot about doing what was best for the WCHA and that part didn't make the story. Well so far the article has more spin than a cycling class at the Y. We'll see what parts II and III bring to light.
Ryan
"A lot of credit is due to Brian Faison at North Dakota. He deserves a ton of credit for putting ego aside and doing what’s right for the league."
Not hard to tell the article was written by a Whioux fan. I guess UND just forgot about doing what was best for the WCHA and that part didn't make the story. Well so far the article has more spin than a cycling class at the Y. We'll see what parts II and III bring to light.
Ryan
Suze
New member
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
It was better on Saturday night, but I wouldn't call it good. The video wasn't crystal clear when there was fast movement on the ice. And the first period of Fridays game was unwatchable.
It was better on Saturday night, but I wouldn't call it good. The video wasn't crystal clear when there was fast movement on the ice. And the first period of Fridays game was unwatchable.
beaverhockeyfan
Well-known member
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
Part 2 of the NCHC series from the Grand Forks Herald. I have not seen Part 3 online yet, but it should have came out Sunday.
http://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/4513130-nchc-part-2-building-league-and-re-do-commissioner
Part 2 of the NCHC series from the Grand Forks Herald. I have not seen Part 3 online yet, but it should have came out Sunday.
http://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/4513130-nchc-part-2-building-league-and-re-do-commissioner
Shirtless Guy
Old Dirty Basterd
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
I think Schlossman is right. UND was the big dog. He could have pushed for them to get more of everything because they drive the conference tournament and TV revenue, but he didn't...
I think Schlossman is right. UND was the big dog. He could have pushed for them to get more of everything because they drive the conference tournament and TV revenue, but he didn't...
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
I dunno, man. If what he reports is true, the very first time that the big money schools had a big disagreement, the low-budget schools went directly against them with McLeod. And let's be honest, there is no way that was the first indication that it was going to continue.
I'm not necessarily taking everything as gospel as this is being told from the NCHC point of view, but, if that's the way things were playing out from the start, why wouldn't they think that it was going to continue? I still think that a better solution could have been worked out, but it would have taken BOTH groups of schools to give and take. Yes, I know schools like UAA felt they were already giving more than they should have had to, but the reality is that they were also receiving a lot of cash from the tournament and the league that they had very little part in generating. The whole situation sucks and I just wish that ALL of the schools have been of the mind of "doing what's right for the league" when it was still the WCHA and CCHA. The WCHA (and to a lesser extent, the CCHA) was rolling along for a long time and it seems as though many, many people got too complacent while many, many other people were trying to move in another direction.
I dunno, man. If what he reports is true, the very first time that the big money schools had a big disagreement, the low-budget schools went directly against them with McLeod. And let's be honest, there is no way that was the first indication that it was going to continue.
I'm not necessarily taking everything as gospel as this is being told from the NCHC point of view, but, if that's the way things were playing out from the start, why wouldn't they think that it was going to continue? I still think that a better solution could have been worked out, but it would have taken BOTH groups of schools to give and take. Yes, I know schools like UAA felt they were already giving more than they should have had to, but the reality is that they were also receiving a lot of cash from the tournament and the league that they had very little part in generating. The whole situation sucks and I just wish that ALL of the schools have been of the mind of "doing what's right for the league" when it was still the WCHA and CCHA. The WCHA (and to a lesser extent, the CCHA) was rolling along for a long time and it seems as though many, many people got too complacent while many, many other people were trying to move in another direction.
manurespreader
Still upright
Re: 2018-19 WCHA Season: 3 Bids And The Second Round?
It remains to be seen if indeed what they did was for the best, or just the best for them and their friends. If there is further adjustment in the leagues, which there will be, it might not end up all that great for some teams and that would be a huge shame if you ask me.
I don't think you can say with any certainty that the decision to form another league has or has not been for the better.
It remains to be seen if indeed what they did was for the best, or just the best for them and their friends. If there is further adjustment in the leagues, which there will be, it might not end up all that great for some teams and that would be a huge shame if you ask me.
I don't think you can say with any certainty that the decision to form another league has or has not been for the better.
Agreed. I always geta chuckle out of the "It's better forcollege hockey if..." comments. I hear it about the conference realignment or about such and such a team being good or about this scholl or that school adding hockey or any number of other situations. It's funny because no one thinks of the consequences of decisions and if something negative happens because of those very decisions, it's played off onto something else.