What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2016/2016 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2016/2016 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

It looks like UMD may be short a few forwards coming into this weekend:
http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/sp...low-forwards-heading-road-series-umass-lowell

I also read in a CHN article that UMD's goaltender from last season (Kaskisuo) departed early and they also have 3 goalies with no prior college experience on their roster. They have the advantage of having already played two meaningful games last weekend.

They should be a tough opponent for Lowell's first weekend. I'm really looking forward to seeing these games.
 
Re: 2016/2016 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

I may go watch men's soccer tomorrow... I see a realtor tomorrow at 10 in greenbelt and being on that side of D.C. Means it's easy enough to scoot up to UMBC.
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Any other night this is a 5-4 Lowell win... but tonight with this manner of officiating, nope
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Patman said:
Any other night this is a 5-4 Lowell win... but tonight with this manner of officiating, nope
Click to expand...

Word is the goal was across the line before CJ touched the goalie but you can't review goalie interference which was called before the review. :mad:
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

leswp1 said:
Word is the goal was across the line before CJ touched the goalie but you can't review goalie interference which was called before the review. :mad:
Click to expand...

according to bob and jim they never had their hand up... I'm sorry if your reaction isn't to call it, you are behind the play, and time evolves then they shouldn't call the penalty and let the result being what it is.
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Patman said:
according to bob and jim they never had their hand up... I'm sorry if your reaction isn't to call it, you are behind the play, and time evolves then they shouldn't call the penalty and let the result being what it is.
Click to expand...

The ref behind the net immediately waved it off and motioned a penalty at CJ. I saw it but I think I was the only one in the rink. Everyone else was going wild.
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Also heard tonight the new point of emphasis is to call everything. Supposed to speed up game for players. :rolleyes: I guess if you clear the ice of players the ones left have more room to skate.
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

leswp1 said:
Word is the goal was across the line before CJ touched the goalie but you can't review goalie interference which was called before the review. :mad:
Click to expand...

What a crazy game. I was wondering why they never looked at the video to see if the puck was in before Smith made contact. Hopefully we'll see more 5 on 5 tomorrow night.
 
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

leswp1 said:
Word is the goal was across the line before CJ touched the goalie but you can't review goalie interference which was called before the review. :mad:
Click to expand...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Re: Lowell-Duluth OT goal, from the video I saw, Lowell should have won that game. Contact happened after the puck crossed, it appeared.</p>— Mike McMahon (@MikeMcMahonCHN) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeMcMahonCHN/status/784578900718419969">October 8, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 2016/2016 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago

from the NCAA Rulebook, Rule 73.1

Goals should be disallowed only if an attacking player, either by positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to defend the goal.
Click to expand...
 
leswp1 said:
Also heard tonight the new point of emphasis is to call everything. Supposed to speed up game for players. :rolleyes: I guess if you clear the ice of players the ones left have more room to skate.
Click to expand...

14 two minute penalties were called tonight in the third period tonight between PC-Mismi. It was a very clean game so no antics as they called EVERYTHING
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top