Maybe it's just me, but I really see Vegas as another Arizona... A team that won't draw for squat... I get that they will be the only game in town.... But I don't see it being a major draw...
Maybe it's just me, but I really see Vegas as another Arizona... A team that won't draw for squat... I get that they will be the only game in town.... But I don't see it being a major draw...
Even if I need to accept that Milwaukee will never get a team, it's still a better option than Vegas.
An even better option is Kansas City, which has no NBA competition AND a ready-made arena.
What about Portland? The Winterhawks fill the Rose Garden every night and instant rivalries with the Canucks and Seattle.
I think Portland would be better than Seattle. But how is it as a media market compared to Seattle, Vegas, or KC?
And a previous disaster with the Scouts/Rockies/Devils.
The NHL is definitely dumb enough to try again.Well they gave another team to Atlanta, so nothing is out of the realm of possibility.
The NHL is definitely dumb enough to try again.
I think a Vegas experiment with any pro team will be real interesting. An NFL team would definitely succeed, just because it's the NFL. But I don't see that happening, at least in the near future.If this happens, I think it will either be a hit or a flop with zero in between. Either people will go see a game much like people go see shows in Vegas or people will completely ignore the team in favor of other entertainment (shows, gambling, etc.)
Is the honeymoon period over in Winnipeg? If the team keeps playing like the Thrashers they are, the fans will start getting restless.Last time I checked reboots have worked in Denver, St.Paul and Winnipeg, but not sure about Atlanta.
Lots of open land up near Nellis AFB and the speedway on the North side of town.I think part of the possible success of a major league franchise will depend upon where they put the arena/field. Locals hate the strip, even though it's the bread and butter of the town. They don't like going down there, they don't like the traffic, etc... If you want the locals to come, you'd be better off putting it out on the western edge of town, or to the south.
On the other hand, the strip is where the people are, and there will certainly be fans of the visiting team who will look to take a "road trip" to see their team play, and where better than Vegas?
I think part of the possible success of a major league franchise will depend upon where they put the arena/field. Locals hate the strip, even though it's the bread and butter of the town. They don't like going down there, they don't like the traffic, etc... If you want the locals to come, you'd be better off putting it out on the western edge of town, or to the south.
On the other hand, the strip is where the people are, and there will certainly be fans of the visiting team who will look to take a "road trip" to see their team play, and where better than Vegas?
Lots of open land up near Nellis AFB and the speedway on the North side of town.
The team would organize with the big hotels to setup shuttle services. Added benefit to that setup would be the continued boozing and the outpouring of money that generally comes with it.I hadn't thought of location issues. But you are correct it will be critical to the success. Personally when I go to Vegas I don't have a car so anything that is not on the Strip or on Fremont St. doesn't get seen by me. I guess it all depends upon if the locals are going to be the main attendance or the tourists.