What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vacante

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

I wish it were so that conservatives would speak up against Romney. Two problems, however. 1) You were thinking of "FOX." I have no doubt that CNBC is just as liberal as CNN, ABC, or MSNBC. 2) That was actually content from the New York Times (DNC owned paper) that they had linked to, so the Romney opposition is even less surprising.

I wasn't thinking of Fox. CNBC has three regulars on it (Kudlow, Santelli, Carney) who openly cheerlead for the Republican party. All they're missing is the pom-poms (I'm going to assume they're already wearing make-up). When they start criticizing him, you know the wheels are coming off.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

You're pretty much reduced to harping on gas prices, aren't you?
In my mind it will play a huge role in the outcome of the election, maybe you think the 99% won't pay attention to gas prices?
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

In my mind it will play a huge role in the outcome of the election, maybe you think the 99% won't pay attention to gas prices?
Big moves one way or the other, yes. But if it stays in the 3s or 4s? No.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

Big moves one way or the other, yes. But if it stays in the 3s or 4s? No.
I think anything in the 4s is a killer. 1.80 or so when he took office, thats going to be an easy commercial for Romney to produce.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

I think anything in the 4s is a killer. 1.80 or so when he took office, thats going to be an easy commercial for Romney to produce.

Sure, except there's nothing the President can do about gas prices. And Free Market Mitty certainly can't change that.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

Sure, except there's nothing the President can do about gas prices. And Free Market Mitty certainly can't change that.
Their are a lot of things the President can't do anything about but somehow he'll still get the blame. Free market Mitty will still point out the rise in prices and say drill drill drill
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

Their are a lot of things the President can't do anything about but somehow he'll still get the blame. Free market Mitty will still point out the rise in prices and say drill drill drill

And the lemmings will follow. Then while he's President everyone will ask why the prices haven't gone down, and all that drilled oil will be on a tanker headed for China.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

And the lemmings will follow. Then while he's President everyone will ask why the prices haven't gone down, and all that drilled oil will be on a tanker headed for China.

It wouldn't even get that far. Sure, we can drill all we want, but given we don't have the infrastructure to refine or transport to a refinery, we are pretty much forced to use imported oil. Get some infrastructure together, and we'll see the difference between WTI and Brent get closer. And according to Obummer, he builds that, so let's see some action.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

Gas Prices = Campaign strategy circa 1980. People don't blame the President for gas price hikes. Maybe they did during the 70's, when shocks to oil prices were brand new and the public had never dealt with them before. It ain't the 70's anymore people. Anybody not smart enough to figure out that drilling in ANWR won't lead to lower gas prices is already in Romney's camp.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

It hasn't been below $3.00 in almost 2 full years. Oil prices aren't even over $100, much less near their record high of $150 and actually dropped today because China's economy is slow.

If Romney wants to run ads showing $1.80 gas, he's going to be receiving ads showing the pile of **** we were in economically at that time in return. That'll go well given his stances.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

It wouldn't even get that far. Sure, we can drill all we want, but given we don't have the infrastructure to refine or transport to a refinery, we are pretty much forced to use imported oil. Get some infrastructure together, and we'll see the difference between WTI and Brent get closer. And according to Obummer, he builds that, so let's see some action.

We should have built more refineries years ago. #1 thing wrong with this country is we don't build anything anymore. Just read an article today that a large chunk of the sewer systems need replacing in Minnesota. There's more infrastructure that needs doing but nobodies doing it.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

We should have built more refineries years ago. #1 thing wrong with this country is we don't build anything anymore. Just read an article today that a large chunk of the sewer systems need replacing in Minnesota. There's more infrastructure that needs doing but nobodies doing it.

There'd be a lot more infrastructure maintenance done if we could figure out a way for politicians to get their names on it!
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

We should have built more refineries years ago. #1 thing wrong with this country is we don't build anything anymore. Just read an article today that a large chunk of the sewer systems need replacing in Minnesota. There's more infrastructure that needs doing but nobodies doing it.

Why are no refineries being built? Environmentalists. Sewer systems? You have to dig up the road, and not only does that create NIMBY issues, but also potential traffic bottlenecks leading to "endless construction" (just like Pennsylvania and their highways). Obviously there are funding problems, and where's that money going? Handouts to those that prefer to sit around instead of getting a job. How about this for an idea: Supervised by a professional contractor and construction firm, let's have those "unemployed" people work towards fixing the infrastructure in order to receive their check.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

Why are no refineries being built? Environmentalists. Sewer systems? You have to dig up the road, and not only does that create NIMBY issues, but also potential traffic bottlenecks leading to "endless construction" (just like Pennsylvania and their highways). Obviously there are funding problems, and where's that money going? Handouts to those that prefer to sit around instead of getting a job. How about this for an idea: Supervised by a professional contractor and construction firm, let's have those "unemployed" people work towards fixing the infrastructure in order to receive their check.

**** that. There are places they could build refineries. We need jobs, we have old refineries now that are way less efficient than what we could build.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

**** that. There are places they could build refineries. We need jobs, we have old refineries now that are way less efficient than what we could build.

Why haven't we built a new major oil refinery since 1976? Obviously I agree that there are plenty of places to build a refinery, but of course you have not only environmentalists, but also NIMBY groups protesting the building of them. Also, along with the refinery, you must build infrastructure to transport the product to and from the refinery, whether it be by pipeline, train, truck, whatever. If you can't transport it, the product becomes worthless, which is why we see such a large difference between the WTI and Brent price.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

Why haven't we built a new major oil refinery since 1976? Obviously I agree that there are plenty of places to build a refinery, but of course you have not only environmentalists, but also NIMBY groups protesting the building of them. Also, along with the refinery, you must build infrastructure to transport the product to and from the refinery, whether it be by pipeline, train, truck, whatever. If you can't transport it, the product becomes worthless, which is why we see such a large difference between the WTI and Brent price.

I think we haven't built them because somebody in the oil industry is making major cash NOT having a new one built. Inherent 'stress' in the system invariably brings the price up.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

The higher the price of gas the less money anyone has to spend on anything else. Scooby has it right, oil companies like no new refineries as it keeps prices up. Not sure what refinery margins are right now but they must be pretty good .
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

I think we haven't built them because somebody in the oil industry is making major cash NOT having a new one built. Inherent 'stress' in the system invariably brings the price up.

The oil business isn't a monopoly. Another company could very well build it and take money potential away from the competition. I believe Hyperion looked into doing this around 2007. http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/06/14/us-refinery-hyperion-idUSN1340544120070614
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca


No one should deserve credit for signing on a dotted line. The ones who truly deserve the credit are the intel officers that devised the plan, the contractors responsible for developing the means the execute the plan, and the soldiers themselves for the execution of the plan. No one else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top