What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

NUProf said:
Where were the Cards for the first 58 min?
Click to expand...
They were skating their brains out, but Amherst was just a bit better, smarter, skilled, savvy.
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

admiral0417 said:
Amherst is an impressive team. It might be one of those teams the Cards don't match up with very well. Their D keeps everything outside and is very mobile. It's hard to imagine Trinity beating them. I thought they were on par with the Norwich, Oswego types. In fact, they are better defensively than either one of those teams.

I've seen enough of the Lord Jeffs for a while. Let Norwich or Oswego try them out !!
Click to expand...

Can't do much better than the goose egg Norwich threw up against Plattsburgh a few weeks ago.... ;)
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

Went to the game. Snowy drive down the 87 from Montreal. First time at the Cardinal rink. Very nice. Plattsburgh just seemed flat. First five minutes...some intensity..a good cycle...then not much penetration or consistent pressure. Good skating club...good skills....just flat. Couldn't seem to hit net and not many second chances. Has to hurt losing your Xmas tournament especially when you make sure you go to the finals by playing Wesleyan. Little enthusiasm from fans. It was one of those games that if it was Junior the coach would be sending someone to scrap just to shake up the boys.
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

PSUChamps2001 said:
Never heard of Emory, but good luck anyways.
Click to expand...

Happy New Year Remy!! ...Emery/Emory Meh....2 losses in a row to a school where by their junior year most guys are doing internships in the summer on Wall Street and aren't really focused on hockey. Not to mention legendary partying. Speaks volumes about Plattsburgh program it would seem. Nice rink, mediocre results. Good luck to you too.
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

NUProf said:
And From the NESCAC thread:



An equal opportunity troll - I'm sure he has something to say about "MacShane," too - that would give him the Primelink coach trifecta :D
Click to expand...

I have seen Beaney jerk to many guys around. Prof..if you are offended by "wanker" allow me to rephrase by stating unequivocally that Beany is not an honorable man. I do not say that lightly. I have had first hand knowledge of his behavior which in my estimation is opportunistic, manipulative and venal. Summing up, at the risk of redundancy and offending you again.."wanker". Happy New Year!
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

elbojpb said:
They were skating their brains out, but Amherst was just a bit better, smarter, skilled, savvy.
Click to expand...

Curious if anyone thinks this Amherst win was an upset?
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

Amherst win was not really an upset. They are a very, very good team. As good a defensive team as there is in DIII hockey. Opportunistic offense with a nice power play. Having seen Oswego and Norwich play, I would rather play either one in a one-game, one-win scenario.
I take nothing away from the Lakers or Cadets. They are the cream of the east. Perhaps they just present matchup problems for Plattsburgh. But anyone who saw the FF last year knows that Amherst was clearly the better team vs. Oswego. Amherst looks as good as last year's team while the Lakers (sans Whitelaw) may not be as good.

I respect the Norwich program as much as any, and I realize they have scheduling limitations, but they need to juice up their NC schedule a bit more and somehow find a way to play Amherst and/or Oswego.
 
admiral0417 said:
Amherst win was not really an upset. They are a very, very good team. As good a defensive team as there is in DIII hockey. Opportunistic offense with a nice power play. Having seen Oswego and Norwich play, I would rather play either one in a one-game, one-win scenario.
I take nothing away from the Lakers or Cadets. They are the cream of the east. Perhaps they just present matchup problems for Plattsburgh. But anyone who saw the FF last year knows that Amherst was clearly the better team vs. Oswego. Amherst looks as good as last year's team while the Lakers (sans Whitelaw) may not be as good.

I respect the Norwich program as much as any, and I realize they have scheduling limitations, but they need to juice up their NC schedule a bit more and somehow find a way to play Amherst and/or Oswego.
Click to expand...

Amherst will be at the Northfield Savings Bank Tournament next season.
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

admiral0417 said:
Amherst win was not really an upset. They are a very, very good team. As good a defensive team as there is in DIII hockey. Opportunistic offense with a nice power play. Having seen Oswego and Norwich play, I would rather play either one in a one-game, one-win scenario.
I take nothing away from the Lakers or Cadets. They are the cream of the east. Perhaps they just present matchup problems for Plattsburgh. But anyone who saw the FF last year knows that Amherst was clearly the better team vs. Oswego. Amherst looks as good as last year's team while the Lakers (sans Whitelaw) may not be as good.

I respect the Norwich program as much as any, and I realize they have scheduling limitations, but they need to juice up their NC schedule a bit more and somehow find a way to play Amherst and/or Oswego.
Click to expand...

Before the NESCAC went off on their own, we played Amherst every year
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

I know Norwich played Amherst prior to the break, but this is a MUCH different Amherst team.
 
admiral0417 said:
I know Norwich played Amherst prior to the break, but this is a MUCH different Amherst team.
Click to expand...

Are you talking about this year? Or are you saying traditionally in the Interlock Amherst played Norwich before the break?

The rest of the teams in next year's NSB tourney are MSOE, Amherst and Plymouth State.
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

PrezdeJohnson09 said:
Are you talking about this year? Or are you saying traditionally in the Interlock Amherst played Norwich before the break?

The rest of the teams in next year's NSB tourney are MSOE, Amherst and Plymouth State.
Click to expand...

I think by "before the break" he means before the break up of the interlock :(
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

NUProf said:
I think by "before the break" he means before the break up of the interlock :(
Click to expand...

Adrian looks much better so far today, scoreless after 1 with UWSP
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

I do like being able to see the live stats simultaneously with the video - I know Bowdoin does that, too. I don't like the random commercials, however...
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

admiral0417 said:
Amherst is an impressive team. It might be one of those teams the Cards don't match up with very well. Their D keeps everything outside and is very mobile. It's hard to imagine Trinity beating them. I thought they were on par with the Norwich, Oswego types. In fact, they are better defensively than either one of those teams.

I've seen enough of the Lord Jeffs for a while. Let Norwich or Oswego try them out !!
Click to expand...
agree...they play disciplined hockey altogether,they dont give up many odd man breaks, as their forwards always seem to err on the defensive side...a tough team for any team to match up against ..Im sure they will b around come Marchish
 
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

NUProf said:
2-0 now
Click to expand...

And Adrian gets one back..

Make that a pair to tie it as UWSP takes a stupid penalty and Adrian converts the PP (Although UWSP does not have a monopoly on stupid penalties in this one) and that's how it is, as they used to say on HNIC "after 40 minutes"
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012-13 Tournament Thread. Lakeside and Mountains! Who wins? + Point @ Adrian

Lawrence leads Castleton 1-0 after 1 and Babson leads Middlebury 1-0 after one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top