grahamalicious
New member
Re: 2011 NCAA Womens Hockey Championship Game: Wisconsin Badgers vs. BU Terriers
2 to 1 at the end of the second period!
2 to 1 at the end of the second period!
2 to 1 at the end of the second period!
Here is how the poll looked at the end of the 2nd period (if you don't close the poll in advance of the game, some voters get more clairvoyant once the final score is posted):
Managed to get my vote in just before the awards ceremony begins (feeling very clairvoyant).Here is how the poll looked at the end of the 2nd period (if you don't close the poll in advance of the game, some voters get more clairvoyant once the final score is posted):
Your question was "who do you like?" I like the Gophers, they weren't an option in the poll.ARM you still need to add your vote! (or are you waiting until after the game?)
For those only looking at the score 4-1 may look lopsided for a championship game..
If you factor in the four posts that Bucky hit it easily could have been worse than 4 and quite possibly as high as 10-1...
QUOTE]
That's a bit of an exaggeration. I do see this as a legit 4-1, 5-1 game.
I must say, I much rather see the best 2 teams playing in the finals. The tournament was never set up to deliver that.
It's very disappointing.
The worst part is the ncaa.com announcers were just bragging about how the conferences are represented in the frozen four. Sure, after cheating kids out of their deserving place, you can all have your fun and political agenda.
NCAA, you suck.
I do see this as a legit 4-1, 5-1 game.
How did Mark Johnson let Poulin slip through his fingers? He should have recruited her
FlyingPig;5090895 I must say said:Who do you figure that should have been?
Sure, they want to grow the sport, rather than present a statistical analysis of how great the WCHA is. I can live with it. I just hope the selection criteria is more fair to the WCHA next season. I don't think it's necessarily obvious why the process was unfair to the WCHA though -- it is definitely not as simple as there being a vast east-wing conspiracy within the NCAA working against the WCHA.The worst part is the ncaa.com announcers were just bragging about how the conferences are represented in the frozen four. Sure, after cheating kids out of their deserving place, you can all have your fun and political agenda. NCAA, you suck.
Well, maybe she'll transfer now. Worked for Prough.How did Mark Johnson let Poulin slip through his fingers? He should have recruited her
Didn't she score both goals against his team in the olympics?
As I remember the plays, in one of them, the puckcarrier was alone. I don't see how her putting a shot on goal is selfish. In the other two, the player with the puck cut to the slot and put a shot on goal. It isn't like either had a player wide open and refused to give them the puck. I'd say they were all nice goals, unworthy of a slight.All of the goals scored on her were selfish efforts that luckily resulted in goals for the opposition.
doesnt appear that they need her...How did Mark Johnson let Poulin slip through his fingers? He should have recruited her![]()
I must say, I much rather see the best 2 teams playing in the finals. The tournament was never set up to deliver that.
Poulin with another singular effort for a goal on Rigsby. All of the goals scored on her were selfish efforts that luckily resulted in goals for the opposition. Something for her to work on in the off season..