What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

Kris Chucko Link

Kris Chucko retires from concussions and returns to the University of Minnesota to get his degree. Smart decision.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

I went to the blowout game Friday night and just returned from going out of town. After the complete domination by our Gophers on Friday, I'm very disappointed to read about the loss earlier today. Although I've learned to never be overconfident, because hockey can be so unpredictable, I have to say after seeing what happened on Friday I was VERY surprised to learn about the loss. I read about the retaliatory penalties, and I sure hope the offending players will learn a quick lesson and not repeat those kind of mental errors that end up costing your team. In goal, Patterson had been playing great, but it sounds as if he may have had a bit of an off game? You would think four goals would be enough to win at home, but it's obvious that defensively the team still needs some work. Hopefully Guentzel will get it figured out and the team will be able to bounce back in Anchorage this coming weekend.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

Kris Chucko Link

Kris Chucko retires from concussions and returns to the University of Minnesota to get his degree. Smart decision.

In my best snarky Charley Walters tone, I see in today's paper news finally made it across the river about Chucko's retirement. Grandpa sports must have an intern perusing message boards for jottings.
 
I went to the blowout game Friday night and just returned from going out of town. After the complete domination by our Gophers on Friday, I'm very disappointed to read about the loss earlier today. Although I've learned to never be overconfident, because hockey can be so unpredictable, I have to say after seeing what happened on Friday I was VERY surprised to learn about the loss. I read about the retaliatory penalties, and I sure hope the offending players will learn a quick lesson and not repeat those kind of mental errors that end up costing your team. In goal, Patterson had been playing great, but it sounds as if he may have had a bit of an off game? You would think four goals would be enough to win at home, but it's obvious that defensively the team still needs some work. Hopefully Guentzel will get it figured out and the team will be able to bounce back in Anchorage this coming weekend.

A part from a brutal stretch in the second period, too many stupid penalties taken, and Blake Thompson looking completely lost out there, they played pretty well. Vermont certainly showed that they aren't as bad as they looked on Friday, and their goaltender had a really solid game. Lots to learn from.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

A part from a brutal stretch in the second period, too many stupid penalties taken, and Blake Thompson looking completely lost out there...

I normally avoid bad-mouthing individual players, but I'll make an exception here. From watching previous games in which Thompson played, it was very obvious that it was just a matter of time before he was going to get called for unnecessary penalties. In particular, he got away with quite a number of high hits in some earlier games that normally would be called. One of the knocks on the Gophers is that they've lacked size and a physical presence on D, but you still need to be smart about it! In the exhibition against BC and the blowout wins over Sacred Heart, Thompson did make some very good plays but overall he was very inconsistent. Apparently, against a better skating and rejuvenated Vermont team today, his inexperience was even more exposed, and I guess I'm not surprised. Hopefully his learning curve will be relatively quick and he'll learn to play smarter while still being physical.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

In goal, Patterson had been playing great, but it sounds as if he may have had a bit of an off game?

Vermont had some pretty good passing plays and a few sniper shots. I wouldn't put any of this on Patterson. There were the dumb penalties, a couple times where the third guy in wasn't picked up (shades of last year) and a case where a player tripped carrying the puck out of the zone (just bad luck) and coughed it up and Vermont capitalized. The Gophs had several chances for more goals, but it looked like a different goalie in net on Sunday. But the real reason they lost was LaPanta and Gorg Jinxed them by predicting the Gophs would go into the UND series 8-0 mid-way through the Friday game and again Sunday when the Gophs were only up 3-1.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

Vermont had some pretty good passing plays and a few sniper shots. I wouldn't put any of this on Patterson. There were the dumb penalties, a couple times where the third guy in wasn't picked up (shades of last year) and a case where a player tripped carrying the puck out of the zone (just bad luck) and coughed it up and Vermont capitalized. The Gophs had several chances for more goals, but it looked like a different goalie in net on Sunday.

I did watch the "lowlights" after seeing the link on the Vermont thread, and I agree that all of Vermont's goals were the result of Gopher defensive miscues and that Patterson had very little chance to stop any of them. I just hope what we saw turns out to be an anomaly and the Gophers will learn from the costly mistakes that cost them the game.

But the real reason they lost was LaPanta and Gorg Jinxed them by predicting the Gophs would go into the UND series 8-0 mid-way through the Friday game and again Sunday when the Gophs were only up 3-1.

LaPanta I can see, but Gorg should know better!
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

A part from a brutal stretch in the second period, too many stupid penalties taken, and Blake Thompson looking completely lost out there, they played pretty well. Vermont certainly showed that they aren't as bad as they looked on Friday, and their goaltender had a really solid game. Lots to learn from.

Blake Thompson needs to be red shirted. His temper changed the game.
 
Blake Thompson needs to be red shirted. His temper changed the game.

And it wasn't just his temper. He played horribly all-around. Clearly not ready. I have a feeling he won't see much ice time anytime soon. If he plays again, it better be because he has worked himself into the lineup.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

And it wasn't just his temper. He played horribly all-around. Clearly not ready. I have a feeling he won't see much ice time anytime soon. If he plays again, it better be because he has worked himself into the lineup.

He looked lost out there. I am not a fan.
 
Re: 2011-12 Minnesota Season Thread (Pride On Ice Returns!)

Q & A with Coach Lucia in today's PP

The University of Minnesota men's hockey team is off to a start reminiscent of better times for a Gophers program that won back-to-back national titles in 2002 and 2003 but has failed to reach the NCAA tournament the past three seasons. I talked with Gophers coach Don Lucia on Wednesday about his team and its 5-1 start.

BS: Are you back?

DL: It's premature. It's early. I like our kids. They want to work. They want to get better. They're going to make some mistakes, like Sunday we made some mistakes (in a 5-4 loss to Vermont). But hopefully we'll learn from it. It's a long year. We're going to have our ups and downs. We're going to have our good moments, and we're going to have our bad moments. I think we've learned some things about our team. We're thin in some areas, but I think we have some guys (who are sophomores) who have improved, which is important. We're getting some good play out of some of our seniors. And our freshmen are contributing. We need our freshmen to contribute.

BS: What question are you getting asked the most with this 5-1 start?

DL: I get a kick out of some people. They automatically think we're going to have this record or that record. It doesn't work that way.

BS: You can't extrapolate it out?

DL: No, you can't. Look around our league right now. A team gets swept, then they go home and sweep. That's our league. There's so little difference between teams. Ten or 15 years ago, there was a huge gap between teams in college hockey and in our league. Now it has been so compressed. There's not that much difference anymore.


BS: So you're not going to be 25-5 after 30 games?

DL: No. No, we're not. We want to get better. Obviously, there are some goals at the end of the year, but it's one baby step at a time.

BS: Seven of your top eight scorers are freshmen or sophomores. As the season progresses, these freshmen and sophomores should make quite a leap, shouldn't they?

DL: You hope so. At the end of last year, we made a lot of progress. Last year, our top two centers were freshmen, and that's a lot of responsibility for a freshman. They improved a lot at the end of last year. We need to continue to do that. Let's keep the big picture in mind. Obviously, we're trying to win every game. We've learned some things the first six games. We've changed our lineup, not necessarily because some guys didn't deserve to play as much as we had to see other players in certain situations to see how they would do.

BS: You beat (defending national champion) Minnesota-Duluth in two games up there. That had to be a confidence boost for your players. Did the loss to Vermont on Sunday chip away at their confidence?

DL: No. I don't think it chipped away at their confidence. I think it was a terrific learning experience. I like Vermont. They get around the rink. I knew Sunday would be a much more difficult game (than when the Gophers beat Vermont 6-0 on Friday night). We did some things that weren't too bright that take you out of an opportunity to win a game. That was a great teaching point. That was a great lesson for our guys. We did our video review and said: "Here's what happened, guys. These are some of the reasons we wound up losing the game." The thing you try to get across is: "You want to give yourself a chance to win every night you play. There are three or four things you need to do as a staple to give yourself a chance."

BS: What gives you the biggest reason for hope this season?

DL: Certainly, (goaltender) Kent (Patterson) is going to give us a chance every night he plays. And I think we have some good skill up front. As long as our 'D' can continue to come around and (those players) play within themselves and keep improving, I think we'll be fine.

BS: What's most likely to give you night sweats?

DL: We're thin in some areas. I think we have to remain injury free in a couple of areas. I'm hoping we're due. It seems like the last few years we've lost some key players early in the year for good. So hopefully, we can have a year where we don't have injuries.

BS: Where are you thinnest?

DL: Probably in the back line. We're young. We don't have a senior. We have a junior, and the rest are freshmen and sophomores. We have a couple of blue-chip recruits coming in next year, and we don't lose anybody.

BS: It's probably good that Patterson is a senior if you're worried about your defensemen.

DL: Yes. It's good to have a veteran there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top