Re: 2010 POSER OF THE YEAR: The Official Thread
![Big grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)
Yeah, but going with the all time posters leaves out a lot of the younger new bloods that would make a strong run. Hockeydad and Umich come to mind for this year who are outside and looking in. That level of moronity deserves recognision and an award.But it's not top 100 for the year. It's all time. Rookies don't always explode in the bigs.![]()
But, on a related note, I am sorta surprised no one has figured out the grouping pattern. Not that I (or CommAv) would confirm any theories, but there is a formula.![]()
Oh come on Ralph, Its just one night where you gotta plug in the names and post count of all of the posters at the time, and then remember where you put the file later in a year. Another nite of putting in the new post counts and a little spreadsheet magic, and you'll have the top 100 list for the year, and as an added bonus, you'll be all set to go for next year as well.No thanks.One would have to track a lot more than 100 to be able to figure out who the top 100 in the last year are.
![Big grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)