What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

1. St. Cloud - Lose Lasch, but I think that will be offset by the young forwards' improvement. Defense loses Raboin and Gaudet. This is the team's biggest question mark. If Lee can step up and take the goalie job full time, I think 40 pts is a possibility.
2. North Dakota - Losing two seniors, one their leading scorer. Get Genoway back, but returning mostly the same team that finished behind SCSU last year. I also think Eidsness slips a little from his great 09-10 season.
3. Minnesota - I don't know how, but they can't be mediocre four years in a row. A full year of Cepis and Barriball, as well as Bjugstad coming in, I am going to go out on a limb and say Lucia delivers with his job on the line.
4. UMD - Top scorers coming back, easy schedule, don't trust their goalies.
5. Wisconsin - Losing just about all their scoring but returning some solid defenders and a good goalie.
6. Denver - Losing everybody, but can't see them finishing behind the teams found below.
7. CC - Good enough to finish ahead of the also-rans.
8. Nebraska Omaha - Don't know anything about them, figure this is a good place for them.
9. Bemidji State - Reality check time.
10. Minnesota State - Lose 4 of their top 6 scorers and weren't very good last year
11. Michigan Tech - This is their chance to escape the cellar.
12. Alaska Anchorage - Lose their top goalie and top scorer and best player in Clark.
Click to expand...

Congratulations to Tipsy McStagger for being the only person to get every selection wrong. :D

There has to be some sort of award for that.. ;)
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

AlaskaRox said:
Hey.. :mad: ...He wouldn't noticed until you and your "52,501" self had to chime in..

Please don't go to 52,502 responding to this. ;) xoxo
Click to expand...
Way to give Dirty an arguement win by mentioning post count. :mad:
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

brianvf said:
I don't think Rox was going to win the argument regardless. :)
Click to expand...
True, going to the post count right away was a clear sign. But I'm trying to prevent future accurances lest he help us lose one to like a Fairbanks fan or something.
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

brianvf said:
I don't think Rox was going to win the argument regardless. :)
Click to expand...

Nah. Dirty was right. I'm just giving him a hard time. ;)

JimmyJ~ What happens when you mention his post count? Sore subject? :eek:
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

AlaskaRox said:
Nah. Dirty was right. I'm just giving him a hard time. ;)

JimmyJ~ What happens when you mention his post count? Sore subject? :eek:
Click to expand...
Do you read the Newbie Guide? Mentioning post count is an automatic loss for any arguement.
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

MinnesotaNorthStar said:
Mentioning post count means you've got nothing...therefore you lose.
Click to expand...

No offense, but I don't think it means you have nothing to say, it just means that you realize the guys got 50,000+ posts, and that in itself is ridiculous. Also, it makes some think that you may take the board too seriously, and don't want to say anything to offend. Just sayin'.
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

dogs2012 said:
No offense, but I don't think it means you have nothing to say, it just means that you realize the guys got 50,000+ posts, and that in itself is ridiculous. Also, it makes some think that you may take the board too seriously, and don't want to say anything to offend. Just sayin'.
Click to expand...

Are you KIDDING? Nobody takes this board LESS seriously than Dirty.
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

dogs2012 said:
No offense, but I don't think it means you have nothing to say, it just means that you realize the guys got 50,000+ posts, and that in itself is ridiculous. Also, it makes some think that you may take the board too seriously, and don't want to say anything to offend. Just sayin'.
Click to expand...

Well Biddco is going to be disappointed that he has been de-throned as the dumbest bulldog fan, congratulations anyway I guess.
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

cross cheque said:
Well Biddco is going to be disappointed that he has been de-throned as the dumbest bulldog fan, congratulations anyway I guess.
Click to expand...
Yeah it cuts :(

But at least he doesn't have to worry about being crowned stupidest Sioux fan like you. Knowing how Sioux fans naturally are, it is an amazing accomplishment.
 
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

Biddco said:
Yeah it cuts :(

But at least he doesn't have to worry about being crowned stupidest Sioux fan like you. Knowing how Sioux fans naturally are, it is an amazing accomplishment.
Click to expand...

You mean "most stupid", jeebus want the crown back that badly?

Also, using my insult as the basis for your insult is unoriginal and lacks imagination not that I expect anything less from you but I thought I could maybe help you by pointing that out.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2010-2011 WCHA Predictions Thread

cross cheque said:
You mean "most stupid", jeebus want the crown back that badly?

Also, using my insult as the basis for your insult is unoriginal and lacks imagination not that I expect anything less from you but I thought I could maybe help you by pointing that out.
Click to expand...

Nope I don't. Stupidest is a North Dakota original word. Thought it would help you understand.

Speaking of unoriginal and lacking imagination. Go eat a sugar beet!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top