What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2009 MLB Playoffs

Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

The top teams are fine with a salary cap. The bottom teams don't want a salary cap because there would have to be a salary floor. You think the bottom teams want that?

Of course the people who really don't want a salary cap are the players. Even though they won't lose any money they trust no one and they won't take a single risk.

I have to admit, I forgot about the floor. That's a good point. As for Handy's point, 100MM is probably about the breaking point, and even the TWINS would spend about 85MM or so, which while low, isn't embarrassing.

I'd like the salary cap more for the overspending teams, so they can't buy EVERYONE. It'd be a slow change at first, but I think the teams would eventually work itself out in evening the playing field for the most part.
 
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

It depends on the cap, right? I can't imagine they'd support a hard cap.

They're not going to support any sort of cap. But you're right we have to wonder if they'd accept a soft cap, but then again what the hell would even be the effect a soft cap would have? Probably none at all.
 
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

Now let's hope the long layoff didn't hurt Lee. Come on Cliff, 3 up, 3 down.

hurt me. tonight is the first game i've turned on during the lcs. waste a whole week and play into november.

baseball is stupid. (baseball corp, of course :mad: )
 
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

Don't necessarily agree with the call, but them's the rules.

It may have been the techniaclly correct call according to the rules, but you know **** well that 99% of the time, an umpire would call that an out regardless. I've seen shortstops make the turn 3 feet away from the bag and still get the call.

It's the timing that makes it suspect. You don't make that call late in a playoff game when you haven't made a similar one all year.

Edit: And it doesn't help when the MLB umpires act like the neighborhood call doesn't exist.
“There is no such thing as the neighborhood play,” said Rich Garcia, a Major League Baseball umpire supervisor for seven years after spending 25 years in blue. “You either touch the base or you don’t.”

Then MLB umpires must be blind as a bat, because the neighborhood call is made routinely. And anyone who's seen more than a handful of baseball games knows it, too. Denying the existence of it makes it seem like they believe the fans are just ignorant fools. Same thing as the nearly automatic calls on tag plays depending on where the ball is relative to the runner (ie, if the glove is down in front, it's an auto out regardless of if the tag's made; if the tag is made on the back or lower, the call will almost always be safe even if the runner wasn't on base yet).
 
Last edited:
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

My bad, looks like Anaheim is carrying three catchers so they could've run for Mathis.
 
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

My bad, looks like Anaheim is carrying three catchers so they could've run for Mathis.

And what's the whole point of having three catchers if you're not going to run for the second in that situation? It's the entire point of having three catchers!
 
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

If that outfielder would have hit Jeter on a cutoff, he single handedly would have prevented that run from scoring. Buck and McCarver told me so.
 
Back
Top