What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I am in the "Standing ovation for what you did for this franchise then boo the **** out of you" camp. You simply can not overlook what he did for Green Bay. 16 years of wonderful memories. But now that he pulled what he did, and donned colors of the enemy, then screw him.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I won't give Favre props for his 16 years until he's out of enemy colors. In fact, I don't see any point to giving him any sort of ovation until his number gets retired. Even then, I'm done acting like he was the greatest quarterback ever. I feel like we've all had this terribly unbalanced view of Favre during this decade.

As much love as we owe him for what he did for this franchise in the 90s and for the way he represented everything we value in football in Green Bay... there's got to be a limit. It's silly for us to look at Favre and only see that glorious night in New Orleans twelve Januaries ago. I love that we had a great team for much of his tenure here, and his enthusiasm and the fact that he was the toughest QB I've ever seen play... but that's only part of the story, and its too selective for us to ignore how poorly he played in the playoffs and in cold weather in the last eight years. Or to ignore how absurd his whole feud with Thompson is. Or how annoying and distracting his yearly retirement debacles (yes, I'm talking about the stuff that started 5 years ago) have been. Those things need to be remembered just as much as the fact that he played hurt so many times.

I'm not saying overcompensate, and deny what Favre did for this franchise. But we do need to stop pretending like we owe him anything. Especially while he's wearing another team's colors.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I won't give Favre props for his 16 years until he's out of enemy colors. In fact, I don't see any point to giving him any sort of ovation until his number gets retired. Even then, I'm done acting like he was the greatest quarterback ever. I feel like we've all had this terribly unbalanced view of Favre during this decade.

As much love as we owe him for what he did for this franchise in the 90s and for the way he represented everything we value in football in Green Bay... there's got to be a limit. It's silly for us to look at Favre and only see that glorious night in New Orleans twelve Januaries ago. I love that we had a great team for much of his tenure here, and his enthusiasm and the fact that he was the toughest QB I've ever seen play... but that's only part of the story, and its too selective for us to ignore how poorly he played in the playoffs and in cold weather in the last eight years. Or to ignore how absurd his whole feud with Thompson is. Or how annoying and distracting his yearly retirement debacles (yes, I'm talking about the stuff that started 5 years ago) have been. Those things need to be remembered just as much as the fact that he played hurt so many times.

I'm not saying overcompensate, and deny what Favre did for this franchise. But we do need to stop pretending like we owe him anything. Especially while he's wearing another team's colors.



A well written post.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I thought the Bears were the huge rival for Green Bay. That is what every Packer fan I know tells me anyways.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I thought the Bears were the huge rival for Green Bay. That is what every Packer fan I know tells me anyways.

Chicago is Green Bay's biggest rival mainly because of the geographical proximity to Green Bay and Milwaukee. There is also 30 years of pre-merger history between the two teams.

The vikings are nothing more than an object of hatred (kind of like the cowboys). The vikings are hated on a level far greater than Chicago.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

May as well weigh in on the Favre thingy. I'm still a fan of the guy. (I'll assume I've lost 95% of you by know so I'll ramble for my own personal gratification since I must be a Favre apologist to still root for the guy.) I'll assume I'm in the minority here, but once he checked in to rehab, I stopped taking him to be the aww-shucks, country boy who just loves to run around and play football. So I don't need to open my eyes to see where he's coming from.

Diva? 80% of NFL players are divas.You go back to the Super Bowl champs. Santana Dotson, Diva. Mark "American Chewy" Chmura, Diva. Eugene Robinson, diva. Nowadays... Nick "Pootie Tang" Barnett? Diva. Donald Driver, Diva. Aaron Kampmann, ok you got me there.

The appreciation and love for Favre IS about all those seasons. It is all about making bone-headed throws. Hell some of his touchdowns were absolutely bone-headed throws. Yes he played poorly at critical times, but his teammates also let him and ultimately the team down by choking on their own vomit at times (4th and 26). And yes he played well at times only to be made to look even better because of his teammates (see MNF 12/22/03), but the fact is he's (cue Madden) BrettFavre. Some want to focus on the loss to the Giants, but nobody mentions what happened the week before against Seattle. Who talked to Ryan Grant after his 2 fumbles led to the 14-0 hole the Packers were in? That's right, the Diva Brett Favre. With Brett you took the good, the bad, and the horrific.

As for his vendetta with TT. I'll say this. How would the Packers have been if Randy Moss wore the Green & Gold? Favre at the helm with Moss, Jennings, and Driver to throw to? I think 2007 would have ended differently. A 4th round pick, I know I don't value draft picks like TT (but who does), but geebus a 4th round pick was worth the gamble.

All that being said, I hope they knock Brett on his *** (but not maim him as some seem to want), I hope he plays well, and I trust Childress will screw this up so we won't have to watch the unthinkable and unbearable.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Drug addiction and marital infidelity? ;)

That bolded part is untrue. It was a prank by an intern on a radio station that got the intern canned immediately, IIRC. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I remember.

Anyway, since Favre's Strahan Laydown, I've lost respect for him every day since. I always hated the *er, given the team he plays for, but I at least respected him. Now? Nope.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Chicago is Green Bay's biggest rival mainly because of the geographical proximity to Green Bay and Milwaukee. There is also 30 years of pre-merger history between the two teams.

The vikings are nothing more than an object of hatred (kind of like the cowboys). The vikings are hated on a level far greater than Chicago.


I think a lot of people my age (30) consider Minnesota to be a bigger rival. It likely stems from the fact that since 1990 or so (roughly) the Packers have owned the Bears. It's hard to have a real intense rivalry in a series that has been quite lopsided. On the other hand, the Green Bay-Minnesota series has been much closer over that span and offers far more by way of storylines. To a lot of us in the 30 and under crowd Minnesota has always been far more of a threat which is probably why we "hate" the Vikings' more than we do the Bears.

That said, I know POYB is without a doubt the biggest Bears' hater on the planet. :)
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Chicago is Green Bay's biggest rival mainly because of the geographical proximity to Green Bay and Milwaukee. There is also 30 years of pre-merger history between the two teams.

The vikings are nothing more than an object of hatred (kind of like the cowboys). The vikings are hated on a level far greater than Chicago.
Merger was when... late 60s? That makes it around 45-50 years of pre-merger history for the Packers and Bears.

I think a lot of people my age (30) consider Minnesota to be a bigger rival. It likely stems from the fact that since 1990 or so (roughly) the Packers have owned the Bears. It's hard to have a real intense rivalry in a series that has been quite lopsided. On the other hand, the Green Bay-Minnesota series has been much closer over that span and offers far more by way of storylines. To a lot of us in the 30 and under crowd Minnesota has always been far more of a threat which is probably why we "hate" the Vikings' more than we do the Bears.

That said, I know POYB is without a doubt the biggest Bears' hater on the planet. :)
On its own merits, Bears are #1, Vikings are a close second. But the competitiveness has been enough to put the Vikes on top of our list as of late. (Ironic considering that for the last decade, its mostly been the Packers and Bears on top of our division) And that sums it up as well as it could.

As a Minnesota native, I have to admit that although I hate Chicago sports fans with a passion- Vikings fans are really a pain in the *** to be around. Especially when you're a big white dork and the only Packer fan in 7th grade. I still consider the Bears our biggest rival, but man oh man do I hate Vikes fans.

As for his vendetta with TT. I'll say this. How would the Packers have been if Randy Moss wore the Green & Gold? Favre at the helm with Moss, Jennings, and Driver to throw to? I think 2007 would have ended differently. A 4th round pick, I know I don't value draft picks like TT (but who does), but geebus a 4th round pick was worth the gamble.
It's not very reasonable to consider what Randy Moss became in NE when you think about why TT didn't pull that trade. Randy Moss in Minny and Oakland was a top notch talent, but also one that would take plays off (which really helps a defense to telegraph what's going on), and was a big locker-room liability. Basically a lazy version of Ochocinco or TO. Obviously, he turned himself around in New England, and hindsight is 20/20. But without knowing that ahead of time, what would make you want to pull for that trade?

And this is ignoring the fact that, while management certainly needs input from the coaching staff and (to a considerably lesser extent) its veterans, personnel decisions are to be made by management. Plain and simple, that ain't Favre's job. (See also: Mariucci, Wahle, and Rivera)
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I think a lot of people my age (30) consider Minnesota to be a bigger rival. It likely stems from the fact that since 1990 or so (roughly) the Packers have owned the Bears. It's hard to have a real intense rivalry in a series that has been quite lopsided. On the other hand, the Green Bay-Minnesota series has been much closer over that span and offers far more by way of storylines. To a lot of us in the 30 and under crowd Minnesota has always been far more of a threat which is probably why we "hate" the Vikings' more than we do the Bears.

That said, I know POYB is without a doubt the biggest Bears' hater on the planet. :)

I'm your age. **** the Bears. Suck or not, let me put it this way: I would rather spend a week with a rabid hyena in a locked cage than see Chicago win a game. I LOATHE Chicago sports. Pure, straight loathe them. Minnesota is second, simply because I like the Twins and Wild, and when it comes down to it, UMD(unless they are playing Wisconsin). But there is not one dam thing I like about Chicago. Except the Uber Stein.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Just curious: is the thread title a reference to a new defensive strategy or the expected W-L record after 7 games? Just wanna understand.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Just curious: is the thread title a reference to a new defensive strategy or the expected W-L record after 7 games? Just wanna understand.

Actually, neither. 3-4 is the combined IQ of the entire fan bases of the Bears and Vikings added together.
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

I'm your age. **** the Bears. Suck or not, let me put it this way: I would rather spend a week with a rabid hyena in a locked cage than see Chicago win a game. I LOATHE Chicago sports. Pure, straight loathe them. Minnesota is second, simply because I like the Twins and Wild, and when it comes down to it, UMD(unless they are playing Wisconsin). But there is not one dam thing I like about Chicago. Except the Uber Stein.


As I was saying... :)
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

Just curious: is the thread title a reference to a new defensive strategy or the expected W-L record after 7 games? Just wanna understand.


Who are you?
 
Re: 2009 Green Bay Packers - NFC North the 3-4 way

It's not very reasonable to consider what Randy Moss became in NE when you think about why TT didn't pull that trade. Randy Moss in Minny and Oakland was a top notch talent, but also one that would take plays off (which really helps a defense to telegraph what's going on), and was a big locker-room liability. Basically a lazy version of Ochocinco or TO. Obviously, he turned himself around in New England, and hindsight is 20/20. But without knowing that ahead of time, what would make you want to pull for that trade?

Even though Moss had acted in a manner worse than Brett (but I might have done the same with Aaron Brooks and Andrew Walter as my QB's), I was 100% convinced that he would have cleaned up his act if given the chance to play for the Packers and with Brett. I remember seeing on NFL films a shot of Moss, jumping off the bench at Lambeau saying something to the effect of "I've gotta watch #4..." It may not have been for the right reasons, but I believed that Moss would have elevated his game back to where he had it in Minnesota. Turns out he did just that with Brady and the Patriots.
 
Back
Top