I read on a blog, which I consider reliable and trustworthy, that if the team wins its games, the Pairwise will take care of itself.
Is that reliable and trustworthy or should I ignore that, too?
I read on a blog, which I consider reliable and trustworthy, that if the team wins its games, the Pairwise will take care of itself.
Is that reliable and trustworthy or should I ignore that, too?
Weekend is not over yet. Denver is still playing -watching on Fox Sports Rocky Mountain. They are tied with Alaska, tied last night. Vermont needs them to win as Denver's tie last night dropped them from 9 to 10. Plus Michigan States win is not post yet.
A couple games on Sunday probably won't impact them unless Yale loses.
Denver's tie dropped them to 9-10 in what? They are first in the PWR.
I am sure he means dropped Vermont to 9-10.
And how about Robert Morris with its home n home sweep of #1 Miami.
Home and home - Pittsburgh one night and Oxford 2 nights later...long road trip for one game...each team.
Yes, I meant Vermont dropping from 9 to 10 after the weekend of games. On Friday, before the games, the top 12 teams looked like this:
Jan 8, 2010 Pairwise – prior to weekend games
Rk Team PCWs W-L-T Win % RPI
1 Miami 24 13-2-5 .7750 .6049
2 Denver 23 13-5-2 .7000 .5869
3 Ferris State 22 14-4-2 .7500 .5740*
4 Colorado College 21 12-5-3 .6750 .5693
5 Wisconsin 20 12-5-3 .6750 .5692
6t Bemidji State 18 14-4-2 .7500 .5672
6t Michigan State 18 14-6-2 .6818 .5645
8 Boston College 17 10-5-2 .6471 .5563*
9t Vermont 15 10-6-2 .6111 .5540*
9t St. Cloud State 15 10-7-3 .5750 .5505
11 Minnesota-Duluth 14 12-7-1 .6250 .5502
12t Yale 12 8-3-3 .6786 .5502
12t North Dakota 12 10-6-4 .6000 .5500
12t Massachusetts 12 11-7-0 .6111 .5384
Then as of Today (Monday) they look like this:
Jan 11, 2010 Pairwise – after weekend of games
Rk Team PCWs W-L-T Win % RPI
1 Denver 24 14-5-3 .7045 .5843
2t Miami 22 13-4-5 .7045 .5793
2t Ferris State 22 16-4-2 .7727 .5763*
4t Wisconsin 20 12-5-3 .6750 .5687
4t Bemidji State 20 14-4-2 .7500 .5636
4t Minnesota-Duluth 20 14-7-1 .6591 .5613
7 Michigan State 18 15-6-3 .6875 .5613
8 Colorado College 17 12-7-3 .6136 .5574
9 North Dakota 16 12-6-4 .6364 .5587
10t Vermont 14 10-6-2 .6111 .5492*
10t St. Cloud State 14 12-7-3 .6136 .5543
12 Yale 13 9-3-3 .7000 .5510*
What I find interesting is that Vermont dropped 1 place (and yes, I understand this is pre-mature to be following...but it is like fantasy football, if it were not for fantasy football, the NFL would not be much fun following).
Minnesota Duluth won 2 big games at home versus Colorado College, went from 11th to 6th; Denver split but went to #1 and Yale has 4 wins and 1 tie (including a 6-1 win over Ferris State) in their last 5 games, but pretty much stayed the same. Yet, Vermont, who has wins over all 3 of these teams, dropped a slot. Guess I was thinking as these teams climbed, Vermont would climb too with their wins over them. Perhaps the 3 game losing stretch Boston College is on is having more weight on Vermont than anything else?
Just curious...
Home and home - Pittsburgh one night and Oxford 2 nights later...long road trip for one game...each team.
Yes, I meant Vermont dropping from 9 to 10 after the weekend of games. On Friday, before the games, the top 12 teams looked like this:
Jan 8, 2010 Pairwise – prior to weekend games
Rk Team PCWs W-L-T Win % RPI
1 Miami 24 13-2-5 .7750 .6049
2 Denver 23 13-5-2 .7000 .5869
3 Ferris State 22 14-4-2 .7500 .5740*
4 Colorado College 21 12-5-3 .6750 .5693
5 Wisconsin 20 12-5-3 .6750 .5692
6t Bemidji State 18 14-4-2 .7500 .5672
6t Michigan State 18 14-6-2 .6818 .5645
8 Boston College 17 10-5-2 .6471 .5563*
9t Vermont 15 10-6-2 .6111 .5540*
9t St. Cloud State 15 10-7-3 .5750 .5505
11 Minnesota-Duluth 14 12-7-1 .6250 .5502
12t Yale 12 8-3-3 .6786 .5502
12t North Dakota 12 10-6-4 .6000 .5500
12t Massachusetts 12 11-7-0 .6111 .5384
Then as of Today (Monday) they look like this:
Jan 11, 2010 Pairwise – after weekend of games
Rk Team PCWs W-L-T Win % RPI
1 Denver 24 14-5-3 .7045 .5843
2t Miami 22 13-4-5 .7045 .5793
2t Ferris State 22 16-4-2 .7727 .5763*
4t Wisconsin 20 12-5-3 .6750 .5687
4t Bemidji State 20 14-4-2 .7500 .5636
4t Minnesota-Duluth 20 14-7-1 .6591 .5613
7 Michigan State 18 15-6-3 .6875 .5613
8 Colorado College 17 12-7-3 .6136 .5574
9 North Dakota 16 12-6-4 .6364 .5587
10t Vermont 14 10-6-2 .6111 .5492*
10t St. Cloud State 14 12-7-3 .6136 .5543
12 Yale 13 9-3-3 .7000 .5510*
What I find interesting is that Vermont dropped 1 place (and yes, I understand this is pre-mature to be following...but it is like fantasy football, if it were not for fantasy football, the NFL would not be much fun following).
Minnesota Duluth won 2 big games at home versus Colorado College, went from 11th to 6th; Denver split but went to #1 and Yale has 4 wins and 1 tie (including a 6-1 win over Ferris State) in their last 5 games, but pretty much stayed the same. Yet, Vermont, who has wins over all 3 of these teams, dropped a slot. Guess I was thinking as these teams climbed, Vermont would climb too with their wins over them. Perhaps the 3 game losing stretch Boston College is on is having more weight on Vermont than anything else?
Just curious...
Does USCHO have any pictures of Miami that were not taken from the Gut last year?
This weekends games are on paper 2 of the easier ones left on the schedule and you would think 4 points is very possible. NE is coming off a wasted 4 goal rally versus UML, and the Cats are on a 4 game winning streak.
Golden opportunity or letdown alert?
This weekends series should be interesting. On paper, yes, UVM should come away with 4 points.....But it's hard to say. The Cats should win both games,however I wouldn't be surprised with a split.
I have done a great amount of soul-searching to try to determine why I seem to butt heads with my fellow UVM hockey fans. What better time to do such soul-searching, I thought, than as the last thread wound down and this new thread began? In that search of self, I welcome any suggestions from my fellow hockey fans who know me best, including from those of UM-Lowell, BC, Notre Dame, and any others.
There is something about ridiculous overstatement that continues to get me. With all due respect, the incoming recruits representing "one of the best classes ever" and invoking the names of St. Louis and Perrin is, well, enough for me to look at a bit more closely.
First off, such statement is to diminish the very freshman class we are enjoying this season - McCarthy, Roos, and Stalberg, to say nothing of Franzon. Despite being an early member of the UVM All-Decade Team for the 2010s, McCarthy does not yet look like a reincarnation of either St. Louis or Perrin.
Connor Brickley's performance - 27 points (13g) in 28 USHL games as a 6'2", 195 lb. 17 1/2year old - makes him an NHL prospect and a wonderful recruit.
With him comes the senior member of the recruting class, Anthony DeCenzo. Unlike snapdog (and coach Sneddon), who saw Anthony as a high school star, I see a 20 year old with 9g-12a in 32 games in this, his third (second full) USHL season. While he is close to being on pace to match last season's 44 points, he is, thankfully, not on pace to match his startling -44 rating of last season. I am not yet aware of anything that should prompt visions of St. Louis or Perrin, though I did not see him play as a high school star. Plus, was he as big a high school star as Matt Marshall or Josh Franklin?
Perhaps too big to remind of either St. Louis or Perrin will be Lance Herrington's 6'4", 205 lb. brother, Brooks. Now 19 years old, Brooks has crashed the net to the tune of 5g-13a in 22 games, 9th among forwards on an EJHL team that is 22-3-1 and the highest scoring team in the league.
Someone who theoretically could conceivably remind of St. Louis' or Perrin's passing abilities is Mike Montagna (1g-2a in 3 EJHL games). An assist machine (51 in 45 EJHL games) as a 16 year old, Montagna committed to UVM as a 16 year old and is scheduled to arrive in Burlington as an 18 year old in September, seemingly without the benefit of a second year of juniors (or any hockey for that matter). If he is what he seemed last season, he will fill a serious UVM void, a playmaking center!
Defensively, the incoming class has only Blake Doerring, an 18 year old D playing for the 22-9-1 Fargo Force in the USHL. In 23 of Fargo's 32 games, on the league's 2nd highest scoring team, Doerring has quietly put up 1g-3a while firing 10 shots on goal. His +4 is very good on his team, though he is not a tough guy (28 PIMs).
I guess there is something about ridiculous overstatement that continues to get me.
If anyone has any soul-searching ideas for me, please.