What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

So wait...the problem with Hitler was...Globalism? Well that is definitely a thought...not a good one nor a correct one but it IS a thought.

So extrapolating it out...if he just wanted to kill the Jews in Germany so things got better that is fine. But when you want to kill ALL the Jews that is crossing the line?
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Handyman said:
So wait...the problem with Hitler was...Globalism? Well that is definitely a thought...not a good one nor a correct one but it IS a thought.

So extrapolating it out...if he just wanted to kill the Jews in Germany so things got better that is fine. But when you want to kill ALL the Jews that is crossing the line?
Click to expand...

That's how I understood what she was trying to say, yes. And, fact is, that fits in exactly with what Trump and the Republicans want to accomplish in the US.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Handyman said:
So wait...the problem with Hitler was...Globalism? Well that is definitely a thought...not a good one nor a correct one but it IS a thought.

So extrapolating it out...if he just wanted to kill the Jews in Germany so things got better that is fine. But when you want to kill ALL the Jews that is crossing the line?
Click to expand...

See, she was watching Sausage Party, and really thought the whole problem centered around the Juice.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Omar fires back at Trump tweet: "Knock if off. You're the president." <a href="https://t.co/QOHu1ibKw9">https://t.co/QOHu1ibKw9</a> <a href="https://t.co/ICVNdmIE2q">pic.twitter.com/ICVNdmIE2q</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1115696408324124672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

See that works :)
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Handyman said:
So wait...the problem with Hitler was...Globalism? Well that is definitely a thought...not a good one nor a correct one but it IS a thought.

So extrapolating it out...if he just wanted to kill the Jews in Germany so things got better that is fine. But when you want to kill ALL the Jews that is crossing the line?
Click to expand...

Conservatives are sincerely concerned about sovereignty.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

ScoobyDoo said:
That's how I understood what she was trying to say, yes. And, fact is, that fits in exactly with what Trump and the Republicans want to accomplish in the US.
Click to expand...

This is what happens when you and your party love right wing authoritarians and you're in a conversation about a right wing authoritarian who went and did a silly thing.
 
Last edited:
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

aparch said:
Devin Nunes' council did keyword searches on Twitter for his name and key phrases, and they're appalled at the results that turned up. They're suing Twitter users for merely discussing news articles in their Tweets. That's right, Nunes' legal council doesn't understand how Twitter works.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">OMG — did Nunes’ counsel do a Twitter keyword search for this reporter’s tweet and then accuse her of bolding the words on Twitter?! <a href="https://t.co/qNAJL2Hk8R">https://t.co/qNAJL2Hk8R</a> <a href="https://t.co/a2qq0aS3UV">pic.twitter.com/a2qq0aS3UV</a></p>— Matt Pearce �� (@mattdpearce) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattdpearce/status/1115435311360643072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

Mike Eidelbes had a pretty good comment on this. He tweeted, "I saw '#YachtCocaineProstitutes' trending and I figured the Vikings must have started OTA's." :D
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

SJHovey said:
Mike Eidelbes had a pretty good comment on this. He tweeted, "I saw '#YachtCocaineProstitutes' trending and I figured the Vikings must have started OTA's." :D
Click to expand...

I figured Trump was giving another speech to the Boy Scout Jamboree.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

SJHovey said:
Mike Eidelbes had a pretty good comment on this. He tweeted, "I saw '#YachtCocaineProstitutes' trending and I figured the Vikings must have started OTA's." :D
Click to expand...

That's great. :p
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Basically...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Is Stephen Miller racist?<br><br>Miller’s classmates: Yes<br>•MAGAs: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯<br><br>Miller’s Rabbi: Yes<br>•MAGAs: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯<br><br>Miller’s Uncle: Yes<br>•MAGAs: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯<br><br>Rep Ilhan Omer: Yes<br>•MAGAs:HOW DARE YOU?!<br><br></p>— Qasim Rashid, Esq. (@QasimRashid) <a href="https://twitter.com/QasimRashid/status/1115612585217462272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN: McConnell: Net neutrality bill "dead on arrival" in Senate <a href="https://t.co/4E2VNGD0OA">https://t.co/4E2VNGD0OA</a> <a href="https://t.co/9ZSxuJXV1P">pic.twitter.com/9ZSxuJXV1P</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1115740947718049792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hey, Turtle Boy. **** YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Win elections. Set policy. Drive these f-cks into the sea.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

French Rage said:
LOL her face: https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1115659588701962240
Click to expand...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/7WM2KpSmvf">pic.twitter.com/7WM2KpSmvf</a></p>— nom de guerre (@nomdeguerre14) <a href="https://twitter.com/nomdeguerre14/status/1115663309594693632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

"You must have an authoritarian in charge." - FlagDude08 .

It's OK, I'm just calling someone out on something they said.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

"War hero" Dan Crenshaw, lol. Something tells me the representative doesn't think of himself as a hero just because he lost an eye in a war zone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top