What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

FlagDUDE08 said:
Well guess what, you don't have the right, you don't have the sport. And given all the gun grabbing attempts throughout the late 20th century, it was necessary. And given the idiocies you and your ilk spout off, it's still necessary.
Click to expand...

What a crock of ****.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

FlagDUDE08 said:
Uh, they hated Trump. Did you see the disappointment on Kelly's face when he was elected? Murdoch doesn't want a populist, he wants a globalist.
Click to expand...

It's on in our lobby all the time. They fawn all over Trump. I don't see any evidence that they don't adore him. He's everything they are: narrow-minded, crude, cynical. What's not to love?

I realize the Alt-Right hates the GOP leadership because they do Nazi a sufficient amount of vitriol against blacks (although I'd have thought the balls out hatred of Latinos and women would make up for that), but I thought Fox was still enormously popular with the conservative base. Is Fox actually losing market share to outfits like Breitbart and InfoWars? I can see Alex Jones and Steve Bannon handing down an edict to demonize Fox for business reasons, but is the right wing audience willing to abandon the warm septic tank that's nurtured them for decades?
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

FlagDUDE08 said:
Well guess what, you don't have the right, you don't have the sport. And given all the gun grabbing attempts throughout the late 20th century, it was necessary. And given the idiocies you and your ilk spout off, it's still necessary.
Click to expand...

Call in the nurse. It's time for your meds, and a nap.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

FlagDUDE08 said:
Well guess what, you don't have the right, you don't have the sport.
Click to expand...
So what? Where's the constitutional right to football? Or tiddlywinks? Guns are constitutionally protected only because of their importance for non-sporting uses (i.e. protection).
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Kepler said:
It's on in our lobby all the time. They fawn all over Trump. I don't see any evidence that they don't adore him. He's everything they are: narrow-minded, crude, cynical. What's not to love?
Click to expand...

Are you sure that glass is from the TV and not the mirror?

I realize the Alt-Right hates the GOP leadership because they do Nazi a sufficient amount of vitriol against blacks (although I'd have thought the balls out hatred of Latinos and women would make up for that), but I thought Fox was still enormously popular with the conservative base. Is Fox actually losing market share to outfits like Breitbart and InfoWars? I can see Alex Jones and Steve Bannon handing down an edict to demonize Fox for business reasons, but is the right wing audience willing to abandon the warm septic tank that's nurtured them for decades?
Click to expand...

Of those that have internet, yes. Especially when you also consider cord cutting is non-partisan. Sure some will place "non-profit educational" clips on Youtube, and most of the time I see it's of Tucker Carlson. However, one thing you'll find with Infowars and Breitbart, unlike the competition we've been used to seeing in the past, is that they'll stand up for each other and promote each other. It's much more about getting the truth in the open than who says it.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

LynahFan said:
So what? Where's the constitutional right to football? Or tiddlywinks? Guns are constitutionally protected only because of their importance for non-sporting uses (i.e. protection).
Click to expand...

If you ask a few lawmakers from Texas... :p
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Let's all give a round of applause to Sen. Lisa Murkowski for the beautifully played fence straddle regarding DeVos. Advances her nomination out of her committee "out of respect to the President" but votes no on her confirmation knowing full well it'd be tie anyway. Played both sides rather beautifully. PO'd everybody...
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Jimjamesak said:
Let's all give a round of applause to Sen. Lisa Murkowski for the beautifully played fence straddle regarding DeVos. Advances her nomination out of her committee "out of respect to the President" but votes no on her confirmation knowing full well it'd be tie anyway. Played both sides rather beautifully. PO'd everybody...
Click to expand...

?

I doubt she POed anybody. The leadership greenlighted her to vote no in exchange for the vote out of committee, and now she can tell her constitents who care that she, "Sniff, even bucked party lines to vote my conscience! (applause) Sniff."

Dat how the game played, homey.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

I have zero issues with how she voted in either case
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Kepler said:
?

I doubt she POed anybody. The leadership greenlighted her to vote no in exchange for the vote out of committee, and now she can tell her constitents who care that she, "Sniff, even bucked party lines to vote my conscience! (applause) Sniff."

Dat how the game played, homey.
Click to expand...
That's why I said to give her a round of applause, she played it beautifully.

But yeah she PO'd plenty of people. The fundies are mad because she voted no thus confirming their belief she's just a RINO and giving them ammunition against her. The liberals are mad because she could've just killed the nomination in committee and her no vote meant absolutely jack, thus giving them ammunition against her.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Mitch dickface McConnell invoked rule 19 (impugning a senator) against Warren tonight after she read a letter from Corretta Scott King written to the Senate and added to the record when he was nominated for a federal judgeship.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
Mitch dickface McConnell invoked rule 19 (impugning a senator) against Warren tonight after she read a letter from Corretta Scott King written to the Senate and added to the record when he was nominated for a federal judgeship.
Click to expand...

He's doing nothing but smiting now.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

He's the worst kind of person. He really is.

There are a lot of sh_tty people in government but he's near the top.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
He's the worst kind of person. He really is.

There are a lot of sh_tty people in government but he's near the top.
Click to expand...

Bags of dicks voted to silence her. This is what it is now- just stop anyone you don't like from speaking
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Wait, all 52 republicans voted in support?
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

This might be my, "fine, **** them all to their own self-imposed demise" moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top