Not much of a surprise. Most gun owners are decent people. It would be interesting to see more research into guns that are ‘stolen.’
Well, it's not quite a Blazing Saddles remake, but it tried:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ridiculous_6
Not much of a surprise. Most gun owners are decent people. It would be interesting to see more research into guns that are ‘stolen.’
You failed to include irresponsible in there somehow.Super frickin duper irresponsible.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My main beef with gun owners. Too many are irresponsible and don't follow basic safety rules.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My main beef with gun owners. Too many are irresponsible and don't follow basic safety rules.
Not much of a surprise. Most gun owners are decent people. It would be interesting to see more research into guns that are ‘stolen.’
One of the more concerning findings in the study was that for the majority of guns recovered (62 percent), "the place where the owner lost possession of the firearm was unknown."
"We have a lot of people with a lot of guns," Fabio said, referencing statistics on the large number of guns in circulation. "And some of them aren't keeping track of them for different reasons — maybe because they have a lot of them and they don't use them that often."
Yeah, decent people who can't keep their own **** together.
See last sentence of my post. The stat they throw out doesn’t really provide any context. I’d be curious what actually happened in those cases. Did someone have their whole house robbed or just a few guns? What is the time period when all these alleged crimes occurred? How many guns over time have these alleged crime victims purchased? I’d bet quite a few of those folks are straw purchasers who haven’t been caught yet.
When it's "unknown," like the first sentence of the quote posted from the article, that's not generally a burglary that's wiping out the house; owners will report those guns as stolen. In 62% of those lost/stolen guns, the location of the loss/theft could not be identified by the owners. If I'm carrying a weapon, I'm going to know whether or not it's on my body from the time I strap on the holster to the time I put it in my gun safe at night.
Get your **** together, gun owners.
WTH kind of question is that? Where does that one even originate?Do you do anything to the person with an unregistered weapon who fires at a picnic full of kids?
Do you do anything to the person with an unregistered weapon who fires at a picnic full of kids?
I think we've all lost sight of something that has happened along the way (then again - maybe not). Life, instead of being treated as an asset, is being treated as fungible goods. If we value life, then using a weapon to settle arguments would be greatly diminished.
Do you do anything to the person with an unregistered weapon who fires at a picnic full of kids?
This is rude and uncalled for. But it is the new normal
https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/08/07/black-lives-matter-crash-cop-wedding/
This is rude and uncalled for. But it is the new normal
https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/08/07/black-lives-matter-crash-cop-wedding/
This is rude and uncalled for. But it is the new normal
https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/08/07/black-lives-matter-crash-cop-wedding/
Do you do anything to the person with an unregistered weapon who fires at a picnic full of kids?
I think we've all lost sight of something that has happened along the way (then again - maybe not). Life, instead of being treated as an asset, is being treated as fungible goods. If we value life, then using a weapon to settle arguments would be greatly diminished.
You've actually touched on the real reason of outrage from the left: "unregistered". The government wants complete control of firearms, a violation of the rights of the 2nd amendment. It is a right, not a privilege. Governments grant privileges, people take rights.
Then where can I buy my tank and my grenades? Cause those are my rights.