What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2026 Elections: To the Midterms and Beyond!

There are MORE Dan Sullivans?

Dan Sullivan endorses Dan Sullivan over Dan Sullivan.

azi62e.jpg
 
There are MORE Dan Sullivans?

Dan Sullivan endorses Dan Sullivan over Dan Sullivan.

Yes. There is:

Senator Dan Sullivan
Former Anchorage Mayor Dan Sullivan
Petersburg Teacher Dan Sullivan

Yes, it can be confusing to people.
 
How much does it cost to get on the ballot and how many signatures do you need?

Every Dan Sullivan in the state should register as an independent for that seat.

I want to see 20 Dan Sullivans on the ballot.

50.

I want people changing their name to Dan Sullivan to run.
 
I think I’m the one of the few left who doesn’t have you blocked for silly shit like this. Kep said “we”, meaning Democrats, including Peltola. If a Mamdani candidate could win in Alaska, yeah, I’d want Mamdani. So would Kep. Voters didn’t want a Mamdani candidate. They wanted Peltola. Peltola >>>>>>>>> any Republican.
Oh please - people started blocking me as soon as they learned i am more of a center left (not far left). Thats a reflection on them, not me. They don't want discussion or debate - they want an echo chamber where everyone nods and agrees.

And - the comment about Kep thinking she would be a republican was obviously in jest since many people on here (Including you i believe) have told me that i'm really a republican deep down. :rolleyes:
No Republican is moderate anymore, not with MAGA in charge. All of us know this, including you.
Sadly, that is largely the case - I'd like to see more moderate republicans as well as more moderate democrats. The one that really comes to mind is Phil Scott (Gov of Vermont). Interesting that Phil won re-election with appx 70% of the vote in the same year that Bernie was re-elected with almost 70% of the vote (which means that a solid 1/3 of the electorate split their ticket and voted for both Scott and Bernie - so there is a large contingent of people out there who like some balance and will vote for the person and not so much the party)
I find it interesting when you say you’re not sure candidates like El-Sayed should be representing Democrats in swing states…but Democratic voters voted for him. If the wind stays at Democrats’ back this fall, I would argue it’s the perfect time for electing Democrats like El-Sayed. Time will tell.
My point was that over time, I believe that in swing / purple states, the "moderate" wing of the Democratic party will have a better chance of winning than DSA candidates. With that said El-Sayed seems to be infinitely more charismatic than his primary opponent and he may very well win (especially with so much wind at the D's back this cycle) - but regardless of that result i still think that over time, Democrats will be more successful in winning elections across the country with candidates who are not so far left.
That last poll is encouraging, 53-45 Brown from Fox. Brown needs to consistently stay at or above 50 in any future polls to have a shot. 47.8-47.2 is going to finish 50-48 Husted as Republicans “come home” on Election Day if that aggregate stays relatively the same.
Will be interesting to see - i agree that in cases like this many Republicans will come home on election day.
 
\The one that really comes to mind is Phil Scott (Gov of Vermont). Interesting that Phil won re-election with appx 70% of the vote in the same year that Bernie was re-elected with almost 70% of the vote (which means that a solid 1/3 of the electorate split their ticket and voted for both Scott and Bernie - so there is a large contingent of people out there who like some balance and will vote for the person and not so much the party)
The bolded part is your problem. Bernie won 63-32, for a whopping net vote difference of 113K votes. Vermont is tiny and weird - you cannot extrapolate anything from there even to New Hampshire, much less the rest of the US.
 
How much does it cost to get on the ballot and how many signatures do you need?

Every Dan Sullivan in the state should register as an independent for that seat.

I want to see 20 Dan Sullivans on the ballot.

50.

I want people changing their name to Dan Sullivan to run.
Sadly the deadline for this election has already passed. But I will keep this in mind for the future…
 
But c'mon. What image pops into your head when you hear the name Troy Jackson?

I mean, when you're a MAGA cuck terrified of absolutely everything.
 
The bolded part is your problem. Bernie won 63-32, for a whopping net vote difference of 113K votes. Vermont is tiny and weird - you cannot extrapolate anything from there even to New Hampshire, much less the rest of the US.
Well, in 2022, Chris Sununu (R) won in NH on the same ticket that Maggie Hansan (D) also won so not sure what you mean by your bolded part.

Sure - ticket splitting is less common in the past decade or so than it may have been 20 years ago but it is not all that unique. Even in that election Phil Scott outperformed Berine - winning with 70+ percent of the vote - so the moderate republican outperformed the democrat (In what i beleive has been rated as the most left leaning state in the country). We have also seen it here in Mass where Charlie Baker outperformed Elizabeth Warren as far as vote percentage during his last election for Governor. In other states you see Roy Cooper winning when Tom Tillis also won. Andy Beshear winning in reliably red Kentucky, Josh Stein winning in NC (although there was not a senate election the same year).

And - per at least some polls, more people identify as "independent" or "unenrolled" than ever - so, yeah, I feel pretty comfortable saying there is still a non-insignificant percentage of people who will vote for the person and not just the party and also like some balance.
 
Oh please - people started blocking me as soon as they learned i am more of a center left (not far left). Thats a reflection on them, not me. They don't want discussion or debate - they want an echo chamber where everyone nods and agrees.

And - the comment about Kep thinking she would be a republican was obviously in jest since many people on here (Including you i believe) have told me that i'm really a republican deep down. :rolleyes:

I would say you're more center than center-left, as you said yourself you voted for Republicans in the past, before they abandoned your shared positions. I have never said you're Republican. You also said you'd vote for Republicans again once Trump and Trumpism is gone. As for the echo chamber, this place is hardly an echo chamber. I've been labeled a blue MAGA, VBNMW. There were two Democrats telling each other to fuck off just last week. Plenty of disagreement in here. I think it's wonderful. I can discern between the positions on this website. Just because you can't, doesn't mean it's not occuring.

Sadly, that is largely the case - I'd like to see more moderate republicans as well as more moderate democrats. The one that really comes to mind is Phil Scott (Gov of Vermont). Interesting that Phil won re-election with appx 70% of the vote in the same year that Bernie was re-elected with almost 70% of the vote (which means that a solid 1/3 of the electorate split their ticket and voted for both Scott and Bernie - so there is a large contingent of people out there who like some balance and will vote for the person and not so much the party)

My point was that over time, I believe that in swing / purple states, the "moderate" wing of the Democratic party will have a better chance of winning than DSA candidates. With that said El-Sayed seems to be infinitely more charismatic than his primary opponent and he may very well win (especially with so much wind at the D's back this cycle) - but regardless of that result i still think that over time, Democrats will be more successful in winning elections across the country with candidates who are not so far left.

Will be interesting to see - i agree that in cases like this many Republicans will come home on election day.

I understand your point. I just disagree with it. My argument is if the wave is big enough right now for Democrats this fall, let's get some further left candidates into office who can push for bigger reconciliation bills that will have a larger effect for a larger amount of time. The American people won't make the connection anyways, and they'll vote for Republicans to tear it all down again in 2030, whether it's a moderate Democrat sitting in the seat, or a DSA-like Democrat. If El-Sayed wins in November, he's going to advocate for bigger reconciliation bills than Peters, and as a far-left Democrat, I like that. If you don't, it's not because I'm wrong, it's because you don't want as big of reconciliation bills as I do.

Well, in 2022, Chris Sununu (R) won in NH on the same ticket that Maggie Hansan (D) also won so not sure what you mean by your bolded part.

Sure - ticket splitting is less common in the past decade or so than it may have been 20 years ago but it is not all that unique. Even in that election Phil Scott outperformed Berine - winning with 70+ percent of the vote - so the moderate republican outperformed the democrat (In what i beleive has been rated as the most left leaning state in the country). We have also seen it here in Mass where Charlie Baker outperformed Elizabeth Warren as far as vote percentage during his last election for Governor. In other states you see Roy Cooper winning when Tom Tillis also won. Andy Beshear winning in reliably red Kentucky, Josh Stein winning in NC (although there was not a senate election the same year).

And - per at least some polls, more people identify as "independent" or "unenrolled" than ever - so, yeah, I feel pretty comfortable saying there is still a non-insignificant percentage of people who will vote for the person and not just the party and also like some balance.

It is well-documented that federal elections are treated differently by voters than state elections. What you say about voters wanting balance at the state level is true, but it doesn't necessarily hold true at the federal level. As for the Kentucky race you cite, Andy Beshear won by 4 more points in 2023 than 2019 with 30,000 fewer votes, which means Republicans couldn't be bothered to show up for a suave black man on Election Day. There was no crossover. Republicans simply stayed home. It doesn't apply. There's a reason I voted no on an amendment to changing our Gov. races to coincide with federal elections, because I know any Democrat would get smoked with all the Trump trash who shows up on federal election days versus forgetting there's an election in an odd-numbered year.

At the end of the day, our donor-class side of the party will cater to you until you leave us for "moderate" Republicans again, if it can ever be said in the next 25 years that a Republican who remained one throughout the MAGA years can become "moderate" again when kowtowing so spectacularly to all of this fucking disgusting bullshit. Thom Tillis is a spineless bitch. Susan Collins is a spineless bitch. Those are your "moderates", continuing to pave the way. The Republican Party continues to move further right, and has since the 1960s, accelerating in the 80s and beyond. The moderates are voting for Democrats now, people like you who pulls our party right and says moderation is correct. I just don't see who or what force within the GOP is going to bring them back to the middle in any way, shape, or form as they all are so far-right on even the cultural issues now.
 
The problem with his statement is that moderate, country club Republicans do not exist anymore. The Republicans have goosestepped so far to the right that half the Democrats are now conservatives who are smeared as raging leftists by the fash.
 
Back
Top