What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Business, Economics, and Taxes 2: That's Why We Fight to Take the Means Back

rufus said:
If Dems win the midterms, you'll start seeing a lot of posts from Drew about how concerned he is about the debt.

Haven't seen one of those from him since Biden's first budget proposal.

Not a peep when the debt hit $39 trillion.
Click to expand...
Easy to remind people that they are allowed to say stuff, but given history, it's completely meaningless.

Otherwise, sic would be all over the dumpy thread complaining that he's selling secrets for money. An actual risk instead of a possible one. Alas, even as post president, they must think he's allowed to do whatever he wants.
 
MichVandal said:
Easy to remind people that they are allowed to say stuff, but given history, it's completely meaningless.

Otherwise, sic would be all over the dumpy thread complaining that he's selling secrets for money. An actual risk instead of a possible one. Alas, even as post president, they must think he's allowed to do whatever he wants.
Click to expand...

I can envision a Sic JAQoff post now.

I’m just trying to understand something about Donald Trump, and maybe someone smarter than me can help.

Is it possible that some of what people call “harmful rhetoric” is actually just… rhetoric they disagree with? Or is disagreement itself now considered harm?

When a political figure speaks bluntly - sometimes inelegantly, sure - is that automatically worse than saying all the “right” things while nothing really changes?

I’m also curious: if the same tone, policies, or outcomes came from someone else - someone more “acceptable” - would we be having the same conversation? Or is part of this about who is saying it, not just what is being said?

Not defending everything. Some things were messy. Some statements probably should’ve been handled differently.

As for his actions, the Roberts court said he has immunity, no?
Click to expand...
 
MichVandal said:
Easy to remind people that they are allowed to say stuff, but given history, it's completely meaningless.

Otherwise, sic would be all over the dumpy thread complaining that he's selling secrets for money. An actual risk instead of a possible one. Alas, even as post president, they must think he's allowed to do whatever he wants.
Click to expand...

Your second paragraph starts with a premise I’m afraid I can’t accept: Sic agrees with you that Trump is selling secrets for money.
 
psych said:
Your second paragraph starts with a premise I’m afraid I can’t accept: Sic agrees with you that Trump is selling secrets for money.
Click to expand...
Last I remember, he said it was ok for him to do that. So even though Secretary Clinton was a theoretical threat, she was worse than the actual threat that we have now.
 
Crude price today: $100 all day until the speech. $106 since the speech.

You can tag the instant he said "bomb them to the Stone Ages where they belong" looking at the tracker -- select Brent and then 1D. The ascender is practically a vertical line from $100 to $105. Since then, a continuous trickle upwards.
 
So, something pretty big happened yesterday. Anthropic, makers of Claude AI, accidentally exposed over half a million key lines of their source code due to a release packaging error. It was quickly picked up by developer social media, analyzed, and forked thousands of times. An Anthropic intern noticed around 4am and started raising the alarm. By 9am, Anthropic's lawyers were online issuing C&Ds left and right based on the DMCA.

They were far too late - a major power user had already forked the exposed code, rewrote/laundered it before sunrise leveraging OpenAI's Codex tool to translate it from TypeScript to Python language, and stashed it in a now very popular GitHub repo. He has since also rewritten it in the Rust language. :LOL:

Worth noting is that SCOTUS has recently declined to extend copyright law to AI-generated code. Aw shucks!

Of course, some are speculating that this was somehow intentional and strategic. I'm not buying it.
 
Kepler said:
Crude price today: $100 all day until the speech. $106 since the speech.

You can tag the instant he said "bomb them to the Stone Ages where they belong" looking at the tracker -- select Brent and then 1D. The ascender is practically a vertical line from $100 to $105. Since then, a continuous trickle upwards.
Click to expand...
Line go up.
Screenshot_20260402-085905_Chrome~2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Despite the apparent income growth in the U.S. the past several decades, the bottom 90% of workers missed out on major earnings growth from 1975 to 2023, creating a cumulative gap between actual earnings and what they would have earned with more equitable growth.
 
Slap Shot said:
Despite the apparent income growth in the U.S. the past several decades, the bottom 90% of workers missed out on major earnings growth from 1975 to 2023, creating a cumulative gap between actual earnings and what they would have earned with more equitable growth.
Click to expand...
Which is exactly why poor people want business people running this country!

Wait, that hurts everyone, right?...
 
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
So, something pretty big happened yesterday. Anthropic, makers of Claude AI, accidentally exposed over half a million key lines of their source code due to a release packaging error. It was quickly picked up by developer social media, analyzed, and forked thousands of times. An Anthropic intern noticed around 4am and started raising the alarm. By 9am, Anthropic's lawyers were online issuing C&Ds left and right based on the DMCA.

They were far too late - a major power user had already forked the exposed code, rewrote/laundered it before sunrise leveraging OpenAI's Codex tool to translate it from TypeScript to Python language, and stashed it in a now very popular GitHub repo. He has since also rewritten it in the Rust language. :LOL:

Worth noting is that SCOTUS has recently declined to extend copyright law to AI-generated code. Aw shucks!

Of course, some are speculating that this was somehow intentional and strategic. I'm not buying it.
Click to expand...

Details from Hacker News:

Users who have dug into the code have published details of its self-healing memory architecture to overcome the model's fixed context window constraints, as well as other internal components.

These include a tools system to facilitate various capabilities like file read or bash execution, a query engine to handle LLM API calls and orchestration, multi-agent orchestration to spawn "sub-agents" or swarms to carry out complex tasks, and a bidirectional communication layer that connects IDE extensions to Claude Code CLI.


The leak has also shed light on a feature called KAIROS that allows Claude Code to operate as a persistent, background agent that can periodically fix errors or run tasks on its own without waiting for human input, and even send push notifications to users.
Click to expand...
 
There are references throughout the "leaked" Anthropic code to April Fools Day. The whole thing could be a very elaborate prank.
 
Last edited:
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
"Subagents" are likely just newly instantiated recursive objects that roll-up their results to the parent object, which then recursively assembles them all for output.
Click to expand...
Yes. What we already do with virtual machine deployment for release management.

Though my naive reading of the other part is that Claude can execute. I thought that was the bright line that we were never supposed to cross? We can have SkyNet tell us what to do, but the moment it can do it itself we're toast.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top