The men's record is really 1-8 since those 3 games are really exhibitions and do not count towards their D1 record. They even lost to first year D1 New HavenIt's just not been a good season for any of the Lowell winter teams. WBB currently has the best record at 5-6, MBB is 4-8 but three of their wins are against D3 teams. Just an all around bad patch right now.
Would probably have to add a men's sport for Title IX purposes, right?A second practice ice-rink for the Hawks, and a hotel attached to Tsongas to boot? As per today's Lowell Sun, UML is looking to build a bit more in the area and also fix some things at the Tsongas. I wonder if the second practice rink would give us finally a chance to have a women's hockey team?
Hadn't thought of that. I don't know what men's sport they could bring in that would cover that.Would probably have to add a men's sport for Title IX purposes, right?
Not necessarily. The rule states:Would probably have to add a men's sport for Title IX purposes, right?
How about a highly competitive men's team one that can win at homeA second practice ice-rink for the Hawks, and a hotel attached to Tsongas to boot? As per today's Lowell Sun, UML is looking to build a bit more in the area and also fix some things at the Tsongas. I wonder if the second practice rink would give us finally a chance to have a women's hockey team?
AFAIK, Lowell has been in compliance because of the enrollment disparity so there still isn't a Title IX need. Title IX has been construed many different ways over the years ranging from number of players, to number of scholarships, and at one point Title IX was tried to enforce an expendature under clause 3. Clause 1.3. is a hypothetical cause of action in order not to provide as many womens slots as the proportionality states but nobody has ever tried nor succeeded in court on that count. I don't know what the exact numbers are in the current but it may be that men are the un-represented sex (clause 1.1 and 1.2) but I'd have to run the numbers. There will always be a technical imbalance as the exact numbers ratios will never match and enrollments are generally dynamic. I'm not even sure what the scholarship/roster numbers are these days by sport to run this quickly.Not necessarily. The rule states:
An institution must meet all of the following requirements in order to be in compliance with Title IX:
From what I can find, Lowell's latest ratio was 57% male to 43% female for enrollment. I haven't checked the exact numbers of athletes to see the ratio, but it would seem to me that adding a women's hockey team would meet both 1b and 1c. Finding the money for scholarships for a women's team to meet #2 would likely be the bigger obstacle.
- For participation requirements, institutions officials must meet one of the following three tests. An institution may:
- Provide participation opportunities for women and men that are substantially proportionate to their respective rates of enrollment of full-time undergraduate students;
- Demonstrate a history and continuing practice of program expansion for the underrepresented sex;
- Fully and effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex; and,
- Female and male student-athletes must receive athletics scholarship dollars proportional to their participation; and,
- Equal treatment of female and male student-athletes in the eleven provisions as mentioned above.
Da![]()
Restaurant in Lowell
Brew Pub, Casual Restaurant, Craft Beer, Craft Cocktails, Lively Bar, Burgers, Seafood, Pub Farewww.seadogbrewing.com
maybe this is already known.
goriverhawks.com
An ugly win is better than a beautiful loss. This game was brutal to watch.3-2 win in OT for Lowell today. Hopefully they can build this into a good second half.
Watched a little bit of this game, and there are 3 things i can say about it:3-2 win in OT for Lowell today. Hopefully they can build this into a good second half.