What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

TV 20 - Sorry no fancy title

Still SOMEHOW overwhelmed by the Big Three. My god, how?!

IHYTLITRPBEWBBLIXT3J5CU7VI.png


That black line is average per, not total. The total is THREE TIMES that line. Just think about that. Think about the alt reality those people occupy, where there is no news, left or right, there is only a holding pen funneling them to the next ad.
Because no one Left of Center watches it. They quit quite a while ago which is why half the anchors are GOP lackeys.

Oh and no one under the age of 30 watches any of them.
 
If you add together CNN, Fox, MSNBC, and each of the big 3, you get about 18 million, if I'm reading the chart right. Let's say 70 million of the 340 million in the US are under the age of 18 (although presumably still capable of consuming news). 252 million with no news at all, or from social media? That's what I call alternative reality. I think I'd worry about those 250 million rather than the 12 or 13 million waiting for Cronkite to show up again.

TV news has been shit for 25 years. I haven't voluntarily watched a TV news program since law school unless you count Last Week Tonight.
 
Watching The Biggest Loser documentary on Netflix.

Everyone involved in the Biggest Loser should be ashamed of themselves. But Jillian will never be ashamed.
 
Last edited:
If you add together CNN, Fox, MSNBC, and each of the big 3, you get about 18 million, if I'm reading the chart right. Let's say 70 million of the 340 million in the US are under the age of 18 (although presumably still capable of consuming news). 252 million with no news at all, or from social media? That's what I call alternative reality. I think I'd worry about those 250 million rather than the 12 or 13 million waiting for Cronkite to show up again.

Don't worry, it isn't news and hasn't been for 30 years. It's soma. It's "here's the DJIA, so that's the economy, bend over" and "here's our pundits screeching far right vs center-right talking points, those are the parameters of legitimate political debate." The irritainment industry doesn't serve anybody but advertisers and the status quo, so people dropping out of it is healthy. And that goes for the Big Three, Fox, MSNBC, Reuters, Ass Press, the Beeb... the lot.

For once, Hovey, we are very temporarily in the same boat, or anyway strapped to the back of the same frog. Now don't mistake me: you sociopathic fucks started this. You created a fake news network to spoonfeed your lofo derps so real journalism could never take down a Tricky Dick again. It's your fault and not to your credit that somebody stole your gimmick.

But we now find ourselves temporary allies, and since you, god bless you, actually still somehow believe your "conservative" bullshit despite the last 30 years exposure of it as toilet tissue, and since you are rightfully offended nothing -- and I mean nothing -- on the airwaves reflects those values, then we can be if not friends at least enemies with common purpose like FDR and Uncle Joe.

The news media now is the rightwing fascism of Fox and OANN vs the neutered center-right monetization of the reaction against that fascism of everybody else. So let's dynamite the whole thing together and fight over the bloody scraps, mmmkay?
 
They had potential. They blew it. I mean when Michael Steele is more liberal has more fight in him for liberal values than 90% of your anchors you've got a problem.

Man, aint that the truth. At least Michael Steele learned. And he actually seems to care. Dude could have had a perpetual comfy seat on the GOP house N gravy train like Clarence Thomas but he gave a shit. Yeah, he's never admitted his complicity so he isn't a profile in courage or anything, but he has some level of standards and a moral core.

AOC, Omar, Warren, Pressley, Talib, Porter, Mamdani and Bernie on our side have integrity. Anybody else?

Anybody?

I mean people sufficiently Left that even most of Midwestern USCHO peels off and gets afraid. Somebody who might actually do something to change the prison of the last 40 years.

I want somebody who scares dx. I love dx, he knows a hawk from a handsaw, but he aint gonna change the world.
 
Don't worry, it isn't news and hasn't been for 30 years. It's soma. It's "here's the DJIA, so that's the economy, bend over" and "here's our pundits screeching far right vs center-right talking points, those are the parameters of legitimate political debate." The irritainment industry doesn't serve anybody but advertisers and the status quo, so people dropping out of it is healthy. And that goes for the Big Three, Fox, MSNBC, Reuters, Ass Press, the Beeb... the lot.

For once, Hovey, we are very temporarily in the same boat, or anyway strapped to the back of the same frog. Now don't mistake me: you sociopathic fucks started this. You created a fake news network to spoonfeed your lofo derps so real journalism could never take down a Tricky Dick again. It's your fault and not to your credit that somebody stole your gimmick.

But we now find ourselves temporary allies, and since you, god bless you, actually still somehow believe your "conservative" bullshit despite the last 30 years exposure of it as toilet tissue, and since you are rightfully offended nothing -- and I mean nothing -- on the airwaves reflects those values, then we can be if not friends at least enemies with common purpose like FDR and Uncle Joe.

The news media now is the rightwing fascism of Fox and OANN vs the neutered center-right monetization of the reaction against that fascism of everybody else. So let's dynamite the whole thing together and fight over the bloody scraps, mmmkay?
I don't believe there is a political conspiracy behind every change.

Mainstream news has changed, dramatically, since I recall first watching it in the very early 70's. The change is not for the better. But it all has to do with technology, not some sort of rightwing conspiracy.

Beginning in the late 70's, when the number of different stations pumped into homes started to exponentially increase, they had to put something on the airwaves. They call it filler for a reason. When you have 50 different information sources fighting over the same number of eyeballs that used to be divided five ways, well, sex and disaster and misery sell.

When you have 500 or 5000 different information sources, as we do today, it ain't getting better. Find something that a sufficient number of people want to watch, whether it's porn or "political" journalism, and broadcasters will push the envelope.

Do we want to go back to the days when I got CBS, NBC, public tv, and if I held the antenna just right, ABC? The news was real but it sure sucked at 11 pm when the test pattern came on and tv was done until the following morning.
 
If you think about it, the Internet basically took us back to the wild west days of American journalism in the 19th century, where anyone can print tabloid/yellow journalism and find an audience willing to consume it and forward it on to others.

The Newseum actually did a nice job of documenting/preserving editions of some of the highly partisan rags of the 19th century, which don't look that much different from the bile you'll find on Gateway Pundit or Breitbart today.
 
If you think about it, the Internet basically took us back to the wild west days of American journalism in the 19th century, where anyone can print tabloid/yellow journalism and find an audience willing to consume it and forward it on to others.

The Newseum actually did a nice job of documenting/preserving editions of some of the highly partisan rags of the 19th century, which don't look that much different from the bile you'll find on Gateway Pundit or Breitbart today.
A while back I read a book by Doris Kearns Goodwin, called The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism that is an excellent recounting of that time, the influence that such journalism had on politics, and maybe even more significant, the influence that politicians exerted over journalists, including excellent journalists, to try to move their agenda forward. A very good read.
 
Because no one Left of Center watches it. They quit quite a while ago which is why half the anchors are GOP lackeys.

Untrue. Our Lululemon Lofos still watch it in droves. It is the pink pussy hat network. There are 1,000 of them for every person who has read Kropotkin -- and without those Pick Mes we will never win any election at any level outside of Brooklyn and Portland. They are our basket of plorables.

Not everybody is watching Unicorn Riot.
 
Last edited:
A while back I read a book by Doris Kearns Goodwin, called The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism that is an excellent recounting of that time, the influence that such journalism had on politics, and maybe even more significant, the influence that politicians exerted over journalists, including excellent journalists, to try to move their agenda forward. A very good read.
A fantastic book as are most of her works. So dense with info especially about Teddy and Taft's wives!
 
Back
Top