Figured I would post the following, which appeared in Friday's edition of the
Union Leader in Chris Duffy's Editor's Notebook:
Hockey-free Manchester a sad reality
The feeling started as I watched Providence College practice in an empty SNHU Arena a day before they dropped the puck on the NCAA hockey regional.
The feeling continued all weekend, through three games played before good crowds, even as Denver put the finishing touches on its regional championship triumph over Boston College.
Then it really hit me, walking out of the arena flanked by a couple of twentysomethings, one of whom was sporting a Manchester Monarchs sweater — a nice Petr Kanko uniform No. 10, for those wondering.
“It was just great to see a hockey game,” said the young man, who appeared to be just old enough to remember the AHL Monarchs.
It most certainly was. No doubt his sentiment was shared by many.
The feeling overrode any other emotion: Was this the last hockey game, not counting high school championships and fundraiser contests, to be played at the big barn on Elm Street?
Ever? Because that would be beyond the sadness I was already feeling.
Forever is a long time. Who knows what ownership group or what college may decide to skate into our city.
In the short term, though, prospects for local hockey fans are not looking good.
Let’s start with the colleges. NCAA regionals, which have called Manchester home 10 times since 2004, have been booked through 2028 and we’re not on the dance card for future sites. Plus, as you have read on these pages, the college hockey powers that be, including influential coaches, seem to be leaning toward returning regionals to campuses.
That’s the postseason. Now consider the regular season. Remember when UNH played Maine there in 2016? Or when UNH and Dartmouth battled for Granite State supremacy in the Riverstone Cup there? Well, you can forget about a return for UNH. The Wildcats have no plans to play any upcoming regular-season games in Manchester.
Let’s move on to the pros. First, the AHL. Surely, you remember the AHL, with all those prospects skating through here, the big crowds and that shiny Calder Cup. Well, sorry, but every NHL team in the Northeast is happy with its AHL affiliate. And for good reason: They’re a car drive away, and transportation costs money. That’s one of the reasons the AHL Monarchs left us for a community that’s about 40 miles from the home of the parent Los Angeles Kings. The lone exceptions to that rule are the Springfield, Mass., Thunderbirds, the affiliate of the St. Louis Blues, and they have a contract to stay put through 2031.
Now to the ECHL, the NHL’s version of Double-A, only without prospects. What’s that you say? Next subject, please? You’d be correct in asserting that we’re not an ECHL city — we’re better than that — and we proved it by virtually ignoring the ECHL Monarchs during their four-year stay that ended in 2019.
For the record, two NHL organizations, Columbus and Ottawa, lack ECHL clubs. Two days ago, the Greensboro (North Carolina) Gargoyles were announced as Carolina’s ECHL affiliate. We’re living in Bruins Country, of course, so what about Boston’s ECHL team? Well, it’s thriving in Portland, Maine, and although the affiliation is set to expire after the current season, there’s nothing to indicate the Bruins aren’t happy with the marriage and won’t do another extension.
Let’s keep trying. Professional women’s hockey? It’s a fixture in bigger cities, and it continues to expand (Vancouver and Seattle the latest), but it’s hard to envision Manchester as a home for a PWHL team.
(WIS note - the Boston PWHL team plays its home games at Tsongas Arena in Lowell)
So now what? Are there any plans in the works? We asked Manchester Mayor Jay Ruais, who was elected in 2023.
“We’re always looking for opportunities to bring professional hockey back to the City of Manchester.,” said the mayor in an email.
We’ll take that as good news.
But for now, all we have are memories. And hope.