JB: Just to finish this off, UMass Mullins Center was funded by the State in its entirety. UMass didn't have hockey when it was built. It started up a program when it was completed. As for the recent locker room renovations, they cost a total of $2 million in 2021, which is a far cry from what UNH is trying to do.
You clearly did zero homework. Nearly all of your examples suggest that there is no link between college hockey facilities and on ice performance. Therefore, your suggestion the Mike Souza needs to "gladhand" donors and win more games to raise money for a Whit renovation is complete nonsense. Mike Souza needs an employer that has a commitment to improving the facility and the lobbyists and political connections to get it done.
Zero homework. You are funny.
I gave specific examples of
recent investments in "new arenas and renovations funded by private money at a state school".
I didn't comment on building the Tsongas Arena because it was built as much for the city of Lowell as the university hence why it had the AHL Lock Monsters. Oddly when the AHL team announced it was going to be leaving a the end of 2010 that is when the University worked with the State to take over the space. I am sure the State was happy to not deal with it any longer. I did not dig where the $5M in 2010 upgrades came from, donations, bonds, etc. that might be a case for you.
Likewise I didn't comment on the Mullins as it was really built primarily for basketball. If you have been in that building you know the hockey site lines are kinda sucky because it was built for a ball going in a 10 foot hoop. "It replaced the Curry Hicks Cage, the 1930s-era basketball gymnasium, as the home of the Minutemen basketball teams. In addition, it allowed the hockey team, which had been downgraded to club status since the late 1970s, to be elevated to Division I status." From the Mullins Center website. "in addition" and also, but not the primary reason.
All of my original examples of renovations (UML, UMA, UMaine) and building the Whittemore are tied to better performance and included Hockey.
I applaud you for actually going and getting examples for your point of view, even if I find them flawed because the cases had additional circumstances (A10 Bball, AHL etc.). Why don't you go find some bonds States have backed for $70-100M for new hockey facilities, particularly for teams doing poorly the lost 5-10 years. Maybe Michigan did it for MSU before that turn around, or MTU before that one, pretty sure those are both the coach doing well with what they have too.
I still hold that I have clearly shown that new arenas and renovations are funded by private money at a state school, regularly, often, commonly, routinely, potentially even the norm the last 25 years. Additionally more often than not based on better performance.
My experience in life is money follows winners not whiners.