Not snark: why? Maybe it's not just not tenable.
After the NY AG required Tether to disclose, it showed on paper what was obvious: the run up in price was no different than a ponzi scheme. Read that twitter thread that I posted a page back. It's extremely dam-ing.
Essentially, the most widely traded coin, one that backs Bitcoin, and was supposed to be backed itself by real assets, was backed by $0.03/$1 with actual USD. There are a few other assets like precious metals, but we have no idea which, how much, or how they are structured. The rest of the backing was total garbage. There is a lot of speculation that the "commercial paper" (which makes up the largest chunk of backing) is essentially promissory notes from crypto companies.
Imagine if an entity issued silver certificates. They are supposed to be backed 1:1 (give or take) by USD. Instead, for every $1 silver cert they issue, only $0.03 is backed by cash, 10% is backed by gold, and 50% is backed by IOUs from silver mining companies or silver traders, and another 20% is backed by nebulously-defined loans.
The only question is if the people behind this were too stupid to understand why this is all bad or if they knew it all along.
Edit: And one more thing. It's worth pointing out that the disclosure from Tether didn't actually provide a balance sheet. It was just pie graphs showing the distribution of their assets. There could be $50 billion there could be $50 million. Worse yet, it likely won't satisfy the settlement requirements from the NY AG. Which means she's going to haul their as-ses back into court and have more oversight. This is going to get worse, even if it rebounds in the short term. The foundation has been damaged and the upper floors haven't felt it yet.