That was a memorable series against our travel partner and foe. Always have the utmost respect for the Big Red, men and women. First game could have gone either way with a lucky bounce of the puck. Outshoot them 2:1 and barely get by. Guess the odds were somewhat in our favor, but nothing is a given.
Second game was gut wrenching, but cutting the deficit in half and making it 2-1 gave me some hope. Murphy is solid but not intimidating in size.
Concerns continue to be penalties and a lack of finish. They happen so frequently that they must be addressed. Seven penalties a game will be a recipe for failure against the WCHA. On the pp, we need to glue someone to that back door post. It works 99.9% of the time.
Colgate has been outscored by Yale and Qpac, 15-3. Game 1 vs. Yale, we outshot them 32-25, gave up a pp AND sh goal while going 0-6 on the pp. Even won f/o, 33-28. Game 2, gave up ANOTHER shorty and 0/3 on pp. Against Q, outshot them 38-13 and lose 4-0 in game one, and 34-25 in game 2 while winning f/o, 36-20. With Noemi back and Murphy in net, there is reason for optimism. Qpac is very balanced and Yale is stingy on defense. The fact that SLU put up 8 goals vs. Yale (think one was an ENG) is a relief.
Score the first goal, bottle up the neutral zone, block shots, and play smart, disciplined, aggressive hockey. What’s with the new, drop back passes from the red line to the blue line? Seems like the latest craze that is unproductive and useless. See it with both M/W.
Rest up, Colgate. As the higher seed, we'll be the home team? Every little bit helps. No. 5 in the PWR, so crucial.