Does Yale have some goofy bandwagon fans popping up and making outlandish statements about their newfound eternal love?
Yale is a good team that will chalk up a lot of wins in a bad conference. Are they a top 5 team? Maybe. Do I think they could beat BC, UND, Denver, etc in the postseason? I dont think so.
Yale is a good team that will chalk up a lot of wins in a bad conference. Are they a top 5 team? Maybe. Do I think they could beat BC, UND, Denver, etc in the postseason? I dont think so.
Totally. No chance a weak ECAC club like Yale could ever beat a program like UND in the postseason. Never going happen. Ever.
Great post until that statement. Yale has had a great fan base for many years and many of us had not had the opportunity to back our team online due to it's performance. It is strange that we do have a very small online presence of our fan base, (note our biggest supporter on these forums resides in Arizona). Call me (or us) goofy bandwagoneers, we are just a passionate as the next teams fans and my love of the team at least has been long term. Someday,if RPI ever comes into consideration for a first place poll vote, may you get to act as "goofy" as we have been.
Totally. No chance a weak ECAC club like Yale could ever beat a program like UND in the postseason. Never going happen. Ever.
Totally. No chance a weak ECAC club like Yale could ever beat a program like UND in the postseason. Never going happen. Ever.
If Yale's resume, schedule, and outlook was applied to a team from Hockey East or the WCHA, this probably isn't even a question. The only reason this is a discussion is because they're out of the ECAC, pure and simple.
Don't take my word for it, look at the computer models - they're designed to be objective, not subjective. RPI? Yale's number one. KRACH (maybe the most objective model of all)? Yale's number one. Want to adjust KRACH for home-ice advantage (KASA)? Yale's number one. The HEAL method, developed at Maine? Yale's number one. CCHP, developed by Eric Carlson at UAF? Yale's number one.
There are a few computer models that don't have them in the top spot. Eugene Potemkin's rankings and St. Lawrence University's CHODR have the Bulldogs second in the nation, behind UMD and BC respectively. Then there's the recursive version of HEAL, which pegs Yale 8th, but many teams generally have an anomalous position on one or more models: Denver is 16th in the nation according to CCHP, for instance, trailing Merrimack. These models are not perfect - but taken collectively, they do serve as an objective barometer, and outliers on either extreme can usually be disregarded. The numbers don't lie: Yale is one of the best right now, and perhaps the best.
They have the best offense in the country by more than a goal per game. Their much maligned defense is now up to a tie for 9th in the country. That gives them an average scoring margin of +2.82, again, better than second place by more than a goal per game. They have the longest active undefeated streak in the country right now with five in a row. They've lost one game out of 11, a game in which they held a 3-0 lead late before the only real letdown of the season. I would be suspicious of a team with an average schedule (Yale's SOS isn't low by any means, it's roughly the national median) who was leading in all of these categories, but about equivalent of other top teams. Instead, their offense has blown the doors off. They are at the very least on par with the UMDs and UNDs of the world. If the only thing you've got to hold over Yale's heads is their schedule, you haven't got much to work with. If it wasn't for a 15 minute let down in a single game, this conversation is even more silly.
Does Yale have some goofy bandwagon fans popping up and making outlandish statements about their newfound eternal love? Yes, they do appear to. Don't let that cloud your judgment of just how good the Bulldogs are right now. If anything, perhaps the fact that they have a bandwagon is even more proof positive that every other indicator is ringing true.
Yale is one of the top teams in the country now, the question is are they THE top team? The reason their schedule comes into play is because it's easy to say they have the best offense, top defense and best record when you play lousy teams. Putting up 7g against an ECAC bottom dweller doesnt' mean you have the best offense.... they are still a top tier team but until they beat someone of consequence (and looking at their schedule that's going to have to wait until March) the recognition as #1 is going to be tough to get.
Great post until that statement. Yale has had a great fan base for many years and many of us had not had the opportunity to back our team online due to it's performance. It is strange that we do have a very small online presence of our fan base, (note our biggest supporter on these forums resides in Arizona). Call me (or us) goofy bandwagoneers, we are just a passionate as the next teams fans and my love of the team at least has been long term. Someday,if RPI ever comes into consideration for a first place poll vote, may you get to act as "goofy" as we have been.
Listen, I don't get this "goofy bandwagon fans popping up and making outlandish statements" jive.
Come on, it doesn't take PhD from Yale to realize that if you play an entire season of weak teams you are going to have inflated statistics. That's not to say Yale isn't a good team, just that you can't make ...outlandish statments like that. And to be considered #1 you have to actually beat some top tier teams. Otherwise everyone would be trying to line up 35 games / year against AIC.
Well look at the threads started for Pete's sake, the best team in the country? Best Offense, Top Defense? Come on, it doesn't take PhD from Yale to realize that if you play an entire season of weak teams you are going to have inflated statistics. That's not to say Yale isn't a good team, just that you can't make ...outlandish statments like that. And to be considered #1 you have to actually beat some top tier teams. Otherwise everyone would be trying to line up 35 games / year against AIC.
Listen, I don't get this "goofy bandwagon fans popping up and making outlandish statements" jive. I have watched Yale in the same way I've watched most other top teams and the original post on this thread was to open up some, hopefully, healthy debate about the merit of Yale as the top team in the country. That weekend, they lost to Air Force, and of course all the naysayers got all jacked up. As far as that AFA game goes, and I am not making excuses for Yale - they had a job to do and they didn't get it done, it wasn't like they got abused by AFA. When Denny Kearney scored off a draw early in the 3rd, Yale held a considerable shot advantage and a 3-0 lead. As human nature goes, they threw it on auto-pilot and Malcolm gave up one **** goal after another. Frank's team was buzzing in their own barn with their electric fans behind them and ended up getting the W. It happens. I think it was a good learning experience for Yale - to play sixty minutes and respect every opponent - which will help them down the road.
For me, this has been a three year process for Yale to get to where they are and why I truly believe they are the best team in the country. When Yale got to the tournament for the first time against UVM, I think it appeared that they were a little happy to be there and weren't quite sure they belonged. It showed in the way they played, they got dominated, but they learned. Last year, Yale IMO may very well have been the best team in the USA from the net out. Before the playoffs, we all know what happened to Backman and we all know what happened against NoDak, and we all know what ultimately happened against BC. The fact that Yale was even still on the sheet after a 180 foot goal and a shorty or two was absurd. With six skaters and no goalie they probably could've won the game. No disrespect to BC, they were a deserving national champion.
At the beginning of this year, the only question mark around Yale was their goaltending. So far between the pipes Rondeau is undefeated (9-0, 1.89, .926). Yale has primary scoring, they have secondary scoring, they have a goalie with lights out numbers, they are good on special teams. This is a team built for a deep run. Will they win the NC, who knows? Does the best team always win the NC? No. It is difficult to run off four in a row - all it takes is a hot goalie and a couple bad bounces to go against you. That said, they are a legitimate #1 should the poll reflect that this afternoon. I've watched the top teams in the west this year, I've watched the top team's in the east. This team is legit and if you haven't watched them - you probably should. They put on a clinic (most nights) in how the game is supposed to be played.
It isnt outlandish - its based on a projection of Yale's performance based on their tangible parts compared to another team's. It's the same premise as recruiting. Is a kid in the USHL better than a kid in the SJHL? Not necessarily. Are the players, by and large, better in the USHL than in SJ? Yes. But when you are recruiting and you find a stud in the SJ, do you say, nah he's not good enough, he plays in the SJ? Of course not, thats ludicrous. You make a projection about where that guy would fit based on his tangible (and intangible) abilities. Are the teams in HEA & the WCHA, by and large, better than the ECAC? Of course. Is it possibile that the best team in the country is in the ECAC? Yup.
Oh, and I wouldn't wanna play AIC right now. They've won 3 of 4. Ahh, but yes, just against "weak AHA" teams Mercyhurst and RIT. RIT sucks, they only beat UNH and Denver last year to get to the Frozen Four. Terrible program! AIC also beat AFA, who beat Yale, who beat CC, who beat Denver, who beat North Dakota and Duluth. F--- this college hockey thing is bizarre!
The argument that Yale's schedule is "weak" is a canard. It is not as strong as some other top tier teams, but it's not weak - average would be a better term. Their schedule is worth considering before proclaiming them #1 but one cannot use it as the only crutch to lean on to avoid doing so. There are some rather strong teams that would not be 10-1-0 against their schedule.
It isnt outlandish - its based on a projection of Yale's performance based on their tangible parts compared to another team's. It's the same premise as recruiting. Is a kid in the USHL better than a kid in the SJHL? Not necessarily. Are the players, by and large, better in the USHL than in SJ? Yes. But when you are recruiting and you find a stud in the SJ, do you say, nah he's not good enough, he plays in the SJ?
Oh, and I wouldn't wanna play AIC right now. They've won 3 of 4. Ahh, but yes, just against "weak AHA" teams Mercyhurst and RIT. RIT sucks, they only beat UNH and Denver last year to get to the Frozen Four.