YabaDabaDoo
New member
Because of all the politics associated with USA Hockey and the selection process for both Select & National Teams, I think there should be a process to challenge for a spot! Now, I don't have it all figured out but it would seem to me "Just like in both High School & College" I was able to challenge for a seat in Jazz or the Orchestra! The process would probably be more like having a requirement of having a form signed off by three (3) college coaches "from different Colleges or Universities" who believe that you have the right stuff and next, once or twice a year "much like the Olympic team walk on tryouts" a meeting would be setup and a panel of judges would watch the challenger and challenged compete for the spot.
Right now there is a strange dormant Active Player Pool list on the USA Hockey Website with names of potential players that was supposed to be updated? By whom? What is the criteria? I believe that the man/women behind the curtain needs to explain and be subject to rebuttal.
There are players who train from a very early age for the opportunity and have very successful careers but never get a sniff and never learn why? I have been to 5 years of player development camps and know a lot of coaches and the common thread seems to be that there are really about 15 to 20 girls each year that are really being looked at and the rest :for lack of a better term" are fodder to make up team to see how these others interact and perform. This seems to start in the Player development program and continue from there. The best players have been selected "as alternates" in the past having never had to show up for player development tryouts? while other players know prior to selection that they will be on a certain team prior to the tryout or announcement of the individuals selected to tryout?
Anyway I feel that there needs to be term limits or challenges otherwise the players coming up through the process really have nothing to aspire.
I would like this tread to cause thought and the aforementioned is only my thoughts, observations and hopes!
Right now there is a strange dormant Active Player Pool list on the USA Hockey Website with names of potential players that was supposed to be updated? By whom? What is the criteria? I believe that the man/women behind the curtain needs to explain and be subject to rebuttal.
There are players who train from a very early age for the opportunity and have very successful careers but never get a sniff and never learn why? I have been to 5 years of player development camps and know a lot of coaches and the common thread seems to be that there are really about 15 to 20 girls each year that are really being looked at and the rest :for lack of a better term" are fodder to make up team to see how these others interact and perform. This seems to start in the Player development program and continue from there. The best players have been selected "as alternates" in the past having never had to show up for player development tryouts? while other players know prior to selection that they will be on a certain team prior to the tryout or announcement of the individuals selected to tryout?
Anyway I feel that there needs to be term limits or challenges otherwise the players coming up through the process really have nothing to aspire.
I would like this tread to cause thought and the aforementioned is only my thoughts, observations and hopes!