If they are so reliable, why don't you name them?
Look, when a person does "research", and they are presented with conflicting information, what they should do is evaluate the sources presenting the conflicting information. The UW web site and a UW spokesperson say she is on the roster. An anonymous person on the internet, with "sources" he refuses to identify says she is not.
That's not much of a contest. The question is WHY should I believe you, and not the university and the team?
(Yeah, I know. You don't care what I believe. That's why you have responded MULTIPLE times now. LOL)I