If Eaves is smart, he would not want any risk of nepotism around him at this point. He's already dealing with a lot of heat.
Thinking outside of the box a bit here, but is there any chance that there would be an associate head coach hired for one of the positions? If we're hearing that some people wouldn't apply for the job if they thought they could lose their job, would there be interest from coaches who could get a 3 year deal knowing that they could step up to the head position if the season goes badly?
If Barry is the one that is giving the go-ahead on any hires, this could be a possibility. Of course, Barry isn't a "hockey guy" so there is that too.
It isn't hard to ask a few hockey people if say Granato (or Oz or whoever you have in mind) would make a good head coach candidate as a replacement for Eaves. If Alvarez got the feedback that he is, giving him a 2-3 year deal and title of Associate head coach wouldn't be much of a stretch. In the end, if Eaves doesn't turn the ship around/climb the mountain/put enough hay in the barn/get the rocket ship to the moon....you'll have an associate head coach that makes less then most football assistant coaches. If you like that guy as a head coach....great. If not, you owe him another year or two if the new head coach don't want to retain him. I see ZERO harm in upping the pay scale a bit, giving multiple years, and hiring a quality guy to help fix the chitshow that Wisconsin hockey has become. If you don't fix it, it will cost you more money in lost revenue anyways.
I want that made into some kind of t-shirt, maybe one scene that incorporates all 4 sayings. The ship turns around to the farm, where the hay is put in the barn, giving time to climb the mountain where the rocket is launched to the moon. And somewhere there is a puppy crapping on a carpet....
http://i.imgur.com/MsxtWBq.jpg
I make this picture free of use to the internet and world. All possible uses forthwith are allowed under Common Commons or something.
http://i.imgur.com/MsxtWBq.jpg
I make this picture free of use to the internet and world. All possible uses forthwith are allowed under Common Commons or something.
It isn't hard to ask a few hockey people if say Granato (or Oz or whoever you have in mind) would make a good head coach candidate as a replacement for Eaves. If Alvarez got the feedback that he is, giving him a 2-3 year deal and title of Associate head coach wouldn't be much of a stretch. In the end, if Eaves doesn't turn the ship around/climb the mountain/put enough hay in the barn/get the rocket ship to the moon....you'll have an associate head coach that makes less then most football assistant coaches. If you like that guy as a head coach....great. If not, you owe him another year or two if the new head coach don't want to retain him. I see ZERO harm in upping the pay scale a bit, giving multiple years, and hiring a quality guy to help fix the chitshow that Wisconsin hockey has become. If you don't fix it, it will cost you more money in lost revenue anyways.
That's the thing though isn't it? What would Eaves be thinking if he's suddenly got an associate coach situation forced on him? I'd fear there would be fur flying by the end of the first month between the coaches.
All of this leads back to what a STUPID decision Alvarez made by NOT cleaning house. There's just no winning in this situation, Alvarez would be given an F if he were being graded on how he handled this.
Eaves gets less than 20 wins and I'd can him. Hell, let's be generous, less than 14 wins and you can him. So what's the point of retaining this guy if you know **** well there's nowhere near the talent (not on paper nor in reality) to get to .500 even? The Athletic department just insured another 2-4 years of ****ty hockey because on top of coaches balking at coming to Madison there will now be kids all over the place who are going to be asking themselves (if approached by Eaves) "will this guy be here in 2 years?", and they're right and smart to ask themselves that.
What's more embarrassing at this point? The U canning Eaves now (so it would appear Alvarez went back on his word)? Or canning him after next season and in essence owning up to the fact they ****ed up by not firing him in the first place?
I love UW Hockey as much as anyone but I just do not see any bright spots here. Someone help me out.
It's almost unfair to Eaves to have not fired him. It's not that this situation isn't of his own making, but this really is just a no-win situation .
This is what I don't understand, does BA really think that next year will be this big turn around where UW is back to competing for the Big 10 and a playoff spot?
I don't see that happening no matter what occurs unless Eaves magically pulls in ALL the top uncommitted recruits, and even then I'm not sure that would happen, but the odds increase.
If you hire a new coach, and the team struggles for a few years, but begins to show improvement on the ice (like markwojo said) then you can feel good about the direction of the program. At this point, I'm not sure what will make me feel good about an Eaves run program no matter what result occurs. Even if they somehow won the NC next season (everyone laugh w/ me!), I would still have so much doubt in the back of my mind moving forward.
As I said earlier, it was a half-measure.
From a fan's perspective (this fan anyway), it does nothing to get me re-excited about the program. In fact, it makes me less excited to the point where I don't care who the new assistants are and am basically apathetic at this point and doubt I'll really get back into it until the inevitable Eaves firing happens at some later date.
Had they brought in a new regime, I'd be all over it as like most, I love the building towards something.
Watching a sinking ship is only enjoyable when it's someone else's ship (and even then, it gets old after a bit), not your own.
As I said earlier, it was a half-measure.
From a fan's perspective (this fan anyway), it does nothing to get me re-excited about the program. In fact, it makes me less excited to the point where I don't care who the new assistants are and am basically apathetic at this point and doubt I'll really get back into it until the inevitable Eaves firing happens at some later date.
Had they brought in a new regime, I'd be all over it as like most, I love the building towards something.
Watching a sinking ship is only enjoyable when it's someone else's ship (and even then, it gets old after a bit), not your own.
I honestly feel double-digit wins is going to be tough for UW. On paper their offense is no better than last year. While Freytag and Malone may be better than anyone in the now departed Senior class the 3rd and 4th lines are pretty abysmal so there will be even less depth. It seems like a wash.
Like EODS pointed out, this really is a no-win situation which makes the decision to retain Eaves all the more baffling IMO.
In other news, Chuck/Andy left Bucky's 5th Q...We didn't always agree but I really enjoyed his insight and the recruiting updates. Now what? Hybert comes back?
Wisconsin Hockey: everyone is leaving or depressed and thinking of leaving or eff it. We have the Blackhawks so forget the rest![]()