What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, What?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gurtholfin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

I guarantee you Mark Johnson will not be the new coach. he was part of Sauer's coaching staff and an important part HEAD RECRUITER. I don't know about you but I recall the talent level dropped under his watch, he didn't travel outside WI to evaluate talent and I don't know of a successful recruiter anywhere who doesn't travel
I’ve seen this brought up many times about Mark Johnson and HIS poor recruiting under Jeff Sauer. Doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. This isn’t just meant for Solo but the questions I have are:
#1 When someone is recruiting aren’t they are out trying to sell the program and playing for the head coach? How easy could it have been late in the Sauer era to go to high end recruits and say come to Wisconsin and play for Jeff Sauer?
#2 “He didn’t travel outside of WI”. Jeff Sauer was the head coach and the head coach calls the shots. If it wasn’t his idea where Johnson was going and he thought it was problem shouldn’t he have done something about it?
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

This Mark Johnson thing is always comical. IF Eaves got canned, Gwoz better be the first person they call and offer him whatever he wants.

This would be a slam freaking dunk - end of story - book it. There is no one better qualified to coach UW than him. I'd even say he's more qualified than Eaves based on his team's average finish in the WCHA vs UW under Eaves.

Practice.... The absolutely comical point in all this is Labahn from an on ice player development standpoint is not an asset to UW men's hockey. All it is is a more physically convenient place to practice. They should have built it to match the KC's sheet size, then if they needed to practice on a smaller rink, go to the Colosseum or Eagle's Nest or where ever or put a set of board in @ Labahn to mimic the smaller sheet size, and then practice. Labahn was supposed to be the fix all to the continual scheduling issues with hockey and BB. Very clearly, it's not. I'm not blaming Eaves, and Eaves by saying what he said, was making a point to the A Dept that they need to still practice there, which they do, but they shouldn't have to if they had built LaBahn right. As a fan, I am rather disappointed in what a flop LaBahn is on multiple points, and this building NOT being the solution to the scheduling issues at the KC is the sour frosting on the dry cake.

One more thing....ditch the 3 1 1. It's obvious it's not working. It would take an NHL team a full preseason to install it and perfect it. UW had 1 week to install.
 
Last edited:
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

I’ve seen this brought up many times about Mark Johnson and HIS poor recruiting under Jeff Sauer. Doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. This isn’t just meant for Solo but the questions I have are:
#1 When someone is recruiting aren’t they are out trying to sell the program and playing for the head coach? How easy could it have been late in the Sauer era to go to high end recruits and say come to Wisconsin and play for Jeff Sauer?
#2 “He didn’t travel outside of WI”. Jeff Sauer was the head coach and the head coach calls the shots. If it wasn’t his idea where Johnson was going and he thought it was problem shouldn’t he have done something about it?

the article that stated Johnson didn't travel seemed to indicate it was his decision. Wouldn't you think the HC would want someone traveling to Minnesota and Canada to get kids?
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Injuries happen. The Sioux played with 15-16 players for the 27 games last year and won the final five. Other players need to step up. It's as simple as that.

now that's some perspective. ouch. I have to agree w/you and Gurtholfin
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

This would be a slam freaking dunk - end of story - book it. There is no one better qualified to coach UW than him. I'd even say he's more qualified than Eaves based on his team's average finish in the WCHA vs UW under Eaves.

Practice.... The absolutely comical point in all this is Labahn from an on ice player development standpoint is not an asset to UW men's hockey. All it is is a more physically convenient place to practice. They should have built it to match the KC's sheet size, then if they needed to practice on a smaller rink, go to the Colosseum or Eagle's Nest or where ever or put a set of board in @ Labahn to mimic the smaller sheet size, and then practice. Labahn was supposed to be the fix all to the continual scheduling issues with hockey and BB. Very clearly, it's not. I'm not blaming Eaves, and Eaves by saying what he said, was making a point to the A Dept that they need to still practice there, which they do, but they shouldn't have to if they had built LaBahn right. As a fan, I am rather disappointed in what a flop LaBahn is on multiple points, and this building NOT being the solution to the scheduling issues at the KC is the sour frosting on the dry cake.

One more thing....ditch the 3 1 1. It's obvious it's not working. It would take an NHL team a full preseason to install it and perfect it. UW had 1 week to install.

I'm not sure that you could be any more wrong on ALL three points if you tried.

1.) I believe that Gwoz was the first choice to be head coach back when Eaves was hired, he didn't take it then and I see no reason for him to take it now. I suspect that it would take any offer on the order of $500k/year to do it, and if you already think that the ticket prices are to expensive, that would only cause them to jump even more.

Gwoz may be a better coach than Eaves, but considering that Eaves has a decade as the HC at UW, I'd say that he is at least as qualified as anyone to be the Head Coach. Do claim otherwise is absolutely asinine.

2.) The issue is that the KC is a multi-use facility and nothing short of building a hockey only arena was ever going to completely fix the scheduling issues. What LaBahn does is keep the team on campus and not having to continually shift from the off campus practice location down near the Colosseum to the on campus game location. That, in the long run should be good for player development (and reduce the time they spend on the mopeds, which is a VERY good thing). The stupid decision was to make the ice sheet in Kohl Center neither Olympic nor NHL sized, and to make LaBahn also non-standard sized would have just compounded that idiotic decision. Anyone who has ever played hockey before knows that each set of boards have their own unique reactions and bounces that can't be duplicated, practicing regularly on your home ice is part of what gives a team a home ice advantage, something that NO practice facility is ever going to be able to duplicate regardless of the size of the ice. If the size of the ice was the issue, Eaves should have made that clear to the powers that be BEFORE the weekend or made arraignments to practice on an Olympic sized sheet somewhere.

3.) To ditch the 3-1-1 as this point is just a foolish over-reaction. Sure they are going through the growing pains now, but to shift away from it will but them back a square one with whatever new system is implemented. Putting in a new forecheck is more an evolutionary process as it is a revolutionary process. It is way to soon to say that it isn't going to work (even if I'm not convinced that it was the right decision) but if Eaves and staff wanted to try and make this change, they have to remain committed to the system for the whole season. These type of systems take time and repetition to get operating smoothly, to change now just kills ANY momentum that they have built up. Plus, it wasn't as if this team was dominating with the old system in place last year which would be the only thing that they could switch into with any hope of being any better immediately.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

now that's some perspective. ouch. I have to agree w/you and Gurtholfin

Eaves teams at UW have ALWAYS crumpled under adversity. Even the 05-06 team became an absolute mess when Elliott was injured.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Wrote about the ice surface tonight if anyone cares. Dug up an article from 2007 when Eaves talked about shrinking the Kohl Center ice to 200x90.

LINK
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

I believe that Gwoz was the first choice to be head coach back when Eaves was hired, he didn't take it then and I see no reason for him to take it now. I suspect that it would take any offer on the order of $500k/year to do it, and if you already think that the ticket prices are to expensive, that would only cause them to jump even more.

Gwoz may be a better coach than Eaves, but considering that Eaves has a decade as the HC at UW, I'd say that he is at least as qualified as anyone to be the Head Coach. Do claim otherwise is absolutely asinine.

FWIW, Gwoz has flirted with openings at both Michigan State and Penn State in recent years. While the NCHC is (probably) a positive for Denver coming out of the conference shakeup, Gwoz realizes the earning potential in the Big Ten market. Obviously some believe that Gwoz was just posturing to force Denver to extend his contract (which they did in February), but I don't think it's the lock that others say it is that he'll be at Denver forever.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

FWIW, Gwoz has flirted with openings at both Michigan State and Penn State in recent years. While the NCHC is (probably) a positive for Denver coming out of the conference shakeup, Gwoz realizes the earning potential in the Big Ten market. Obviously some believe that Gwoz was just posturing to force Denver to extend his contract (which they did in February), but I don't think it's the lock that others say it is that he'll be at Denver forever.

Don't get me wrong, Gwoz is a great coach and he should be at the top of any short list when a marque program is looking for a new head coach. What is clear to me is that he knows that he has a good thing at Denver (how things will change in the future with the NCHA is TBD) and that to leave it will have to be a near perfect fit for him, and I don't believe that UW is going to be that fit for him until the athletic department stops treating the hockey program as second rate.

As you point out, depending on how things shake out in the new world order that could change in a hurry.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Eaves teams at UW have ALWAYS crumpled under adversity. Even the 05-06 team became an absolute mess when Elliott was injured.

truth. it was rather remarkable in 05-06 how they stumbled w/out Elliott, I mean Ells was fantastic but Connelly was a serviceable back-up (notable mistake/bad game being in GB I recall the oddball goal that seemed to walk in at 10mph from osu!)

with regard to Gwozdecky, I'm not sure if anyone else will recall this, at one point in the late 90's (IIRC) he was interviewed about taking the DU job and since he was a UW alum would he consider taking the reigns after Sauer, his response paraphrased "Wisconsin has had their time" so not only did he dismiss the idea he must also harbor some negative feelings about his time there?
 
Last edited:
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Wrote about the ice surface tonight if anyone cares. Dug up an article from 2007 when Eaves talked about shrinking the Kohl Center ice to 200x90.

LINK

Thanks for digging that up. I had recalled that he had this KC ice sheet reduction thought. It's never going to happen, that was a pipe dream.
********************
Ditching the 3 1 1 wouldn't be a big deal, all the players are used to the old system but the Fr, and they are still blank canvasses at this point.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Ditching the 3 1 1 wouldn't be a big deal, all the players are used to the old system but the Fr, and they are still blank canvasses at this point.

Why would you want to return to a system that resulted in a 21-16-4 record resulting in not earning home ice, not making the F5, and not making the NCAAs in 2010-11 and a 17-18-2 record and not earning home ice, not making the F5, and not making the NCAAs in 2011-12?

While I'm not convinced that a 1-1-3 is the right system, I am convinced that the old system wasn't working based on the overall results of the last 2 seasons. I'd rather the coaching staff try something new and fail, than continue to use the same old system that resulted in painfully average results over the last few seasons.
 
Last edited:
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Why would you want to return to a system that resulted in a 21-16-4 record resulting in not earning home ice, not making the F5, and not making the NCAAs in 2010-11 and a 17-18-2 record and not earning home ice, not making the F5, and not making the NCAAs in 2011-12?

While I'm not convinced that a 1-1-3 is the right system, I am convinced that the old system wasn't working based on the overall results of the last 2 seasons. I'd rather the coaching staff try something new and fail, than continue to use the same old system that resulted in painfully average results over the last few seasons.

That's a flawed logic.

Different players, different years, different talent levels. The old offensive system didn't have a problem working back in 09-10.

Maybe it's too early to jump the gun (Ok, I know it's too early even though I frustratingly wrote they need to dump it) but man it's been ugly to watch at times.

Wisconsin already has a bad perception in the minds of recruits in terms of Eaves limiting their offensive creativity, now we're going to play a system that sits back and traps even more? Guys like Lucia and Berenson are laughing.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

That's a flawed logic.

Different players, different years, different talent levels. The old offensive system didn't have a problem working back in 09-10.

Maybe it's too early to jump the gun (Ok, I know it's too early even though I frustratingly wrote they need to dump it) but man it's been ugly to watch at times.

Wisconsin already has a bad perception in the minds of recruits in terms of Eaves limiting their offensive creativity, now we're going to play a system that sits back and traps even more? Guys like Lucia and Berenson are laughing.

You win the prize Mr. Schwartz!!!!!

I was waiting to see when someone was going to recognize the white elephant in the room! The 1-1-3 is a Neutral Zone Trap!!!!

Welcome to boring hockey where you have to play trap because you can not compete offensively so you play trap in hopes of winning 2-1.

And yes you are correct, what high end forward wants to play in a trap system?
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Late to the party on some of the discussion on some of the problems surrounding UW.

Yeap attendance is down and that is not a new story. There are a littany of factors that go into that and some certainly fall at the feet of Eaves while many also do not. Ticket prices, parking prices, on ice results (but let's be brutually honest....they are not all that different then the up and down we saw the last decade of Sauer), a crapy economy pinching discretionary income, and the one I think is underaprreciated is where hockey falls into the hierarchy of UW sports. For a long time, hockey was the flagship program for sucess while football and bounceyball floundered in mediocrity (or worse). There has been a prolonged run of succes in football and basketball and I think unfortunately at some point that has had an impact on where hockey sits in the conciousness of potential fans and their wallets. There's a whole new generation that thinks it's cooler to go to football or basketball games long before a hockey game and that simply was not the case as much a couple decades ago. Attendance for last seasons UNO series at the end of October was 20920 which is not all that different then the 19337 for CC this past weekend.

Eaves on the practicing on the Kohl surface is as many others have said more a dig at the folks deciding the facility scheduling then an excuse for his team in my opinoin. Solovsfett, North Dakota can show up and play well regardless of ice surface size because A) they are never second or third fiddle on their home rink and B) their facilities are phenominal and from their locker room they can either walkout and down a hallway onto the Ralph sheet, or up a short staircase onto the Olympic sheet depending on where they are playing that given week. North Dakota hockey is NEVER not going to have access to their ice sheet because of bounceyball, volleyball, wrestling, concerts because they are at the top of the foodchain for their building and not toward the bottom as UW hockey is.

Did Oz make Eaves or did Eaves make Oz? I suspect it is a little of both and bit more of Eaves AND the UW program as it was Oz. Oz has had some success elsewhere, but I'm pretty sure Blais wins at North Dakota with or without Oz in the one year he was in the right place at the right time. If Oz was so great and so awesome at D devlopement, why have the NHL advisors not steered their kids to OSU cause last I checked Oz is not rolling in blue chip dman recruits that are getting drafted in the top few rounds every year? I get OSU is not one of the premier programs as far as tradition lots of other factors, but neither was Notre Dame or Miami before there last coaching hires. I'm not trying to say Oz is not a solid coach and a very very good assistant at the college level, but I am trying to say some of his sucess/reputation is directly attributable to the Wisconsin hockey franchise (history, facilities, fan support, ect) and Eaves. While, I may seem to those that reveer Oz to have just tore down Oz, I do think him leaving (I think he was one of the best assistants when he was an assistant) and replacing assistants in general has been part of (many) problems that have hampered the program. In Oz's case, I think it was a lot of a victim of your own sucess (as you can argue was the case with Hynes and MAYBE even Patrick).

On the not getting top dmen recruits, we didn't always get them under Oz recruiting coordination either. McDonagh, McBain, & Gardiner were guys that the flagship homestate school were not full court press from the get go on and call it luck or a better eye at a younger age then most but it worked out for UW. At this point, UW has been getting commits from well regard 15/16 year olds that time will tell if they turn out like what will likely go down as an unprecedented era of elite dman at UW (or any other school for that matter). Whether it was Oz, luck, Eaves, or whatever, we got spoiled being able to run out a dcorp like we did for a few years.

Mark Johnson....ugggh. Taking a guy that has been coaching womans hockey for a decade to be the head guy at UW would not be a good hire.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

interesting points markwojo

the most successful years for Eaves were years 2, 3 and 4. made the NCAA's 3 consecutive years and won it all in year 4. Oz was on board only for year 4 (championship) so I don't think he factored to heavily one way or another there...but my question is this, given that success early, why did Eaves decide immediately to change recruiting tactics after winning the NCAA title? it appears he walked from the successful plan into a new plan for recruiting that I have to say has not worked (2010 aside) considering *only* wins/losses and ncaa appearances.
 
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. 22 - Let's not have another cheesy thread title... Wait, W

Why would you want to return to a system that resulted in a 21-16-4 record resulting in not earning home ice, not making the F5, and not making the NCAAs in 2010-11 and a 17-18-2 record and not earning home ice, not making the F5, and not making the NCAAs in 2011-12?

While I'm not convinced that a 1-1-3 is the right system, I am convinced that the old system wasn't working based on the overall results of the last 2 seasons. I'd rather the coaching staff try something new and fail, than continue to use the same old system that resulted in painfully average results over the last few seasons.

IMHO, it's not the system that is the problem, it's the quality of F's, the uneven recruiting classes, and lack of a stud goalie since Elliott left. Rumpel has the makings of fixing 1/3 of the problem, the uneven class deal is almost hopeless to fix and the quality of F's is fixable, but will it get fixed?
 
interesting points markwojo

the most successful years for Eaves were years 2, 3 and 4. made the NCAA's 3 consecutive years and won it all in year 4. Oz was on board only for year 4 (championship) so I don't think he factored to heavily one way or another there...but my question is this, given that success early, why did Eaves decide immediately to change recruiting tactics after winning the NCAA title? it appears he walked from the successful plan into a new plan for recruiting that I have to say has not worked (2010 aside) considering *only* wins/losses and ncaa appearances.

I don't think that Eaves really changed his recruiting after 2006, I do think he decided that one-and-done players are more trouble than they are worth (or more specifically, players drafted high in the NHL draft who THINK they should be a one-and-done player). mostly because those players are focused on making the NHL and not doing the little things it takes to win at UW.

I still believe that the 2010 team underachieved inspite of making the champ game in Detroit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top