solovsfett
Registered User
We watched the Merrimack broadcast, don't be fooled by the 11 goals. UW has no ability to sustain a forecheck, even against a team with 54 freshmen, the transition D is bad and the coverage in the D zone is bad. On Merrimack's 3rd goal, a 2 on 1 that ended up being a 1-0, the D back was Cole Caulfield, I have no idea where the real D were. It wasn't even a shooting gallery with 11 goals, the Merrimack goalies were so bad the puck just went in during the 2nd period. And the 1st period for UW had no more than 4 even strength SOG, a trend from the BC game. I find this game very troubling that UW could not have sustained periods of O zone time and the D was sloppy. And anyone who wants Berry ahead of the Hammer didn't watch tonight's game. Sure Barry came in cold, but he had a save percent of 0% after the first 2 shots he faced. This was the kind of team UW should have continually hemmed in their D zone and outshot them 40 to 20. It didn't happen. Don't be fooled by the score. I bet if I had seen the BC game, I'd be on thinner tonight.
Well put.
And like i’ve Been saying for a while now Wisconsin hockey is in trouble.
How the hell will they make the playoffs giving up 5 goals per game? The BC, BU’s of the world who play smart and are loaded with talent will kick the **** out of UW.
Oz has clearly lost it with regard to teaching defense. The goalies are terrible, they stilll have problems with face offs and seriously, with an influx of talent like they have this is the end product???
I think .500 is a realistic goal and if that happens, fire the entire staff.