I think Strobel fits what Tony and Oz want to do most, which is rebuild the Wisco Hockey Culture. Strobel is very impressive in person (and on the recruiting trail) and he is a terrific Culture guy that is excellent at connecting the past with the future. I've met Miller, he is great and a terrific guy (although I'll always hate him for stealing Will Butcher) but what all the long time fans and program alumni are clamoring for, namely, bringing back the winning Wisco Hockey Culture, is not what Steve Miller would be best at. He's best at recruiting and coaching D. We have, what is considered by anybody that knows anything, the best recruiter and developer of D in NCAA hockey, so that space is filled. Would Miller still be an asset? Sure. Is he a better coach than Strobel? I guess you could easily come to that conclusion, but I don't think what Miller does is what Tony wants Strobel on staff for.
I think we played a lot of guys in their 10th NCAA game this weekend, especially on the PK, against a lot of guys in their 100th NCAA game. I don't think it's a lot more complicated than that.
I have said several times before that I think Tony has been on a 5 year plan from the start. Unlike 15-20 years ago when a new coach like Eaves could bring in big talent in his second year, next year will be the first mostly open class that Tony went head to head with the other Big Boys when Turcotte, Lindmark, Holloway were 13-15 years old. Even then, Caufield's were already committed, but obviously they were able to flip them. So that is when you have to get them now, then wait 4 years 'til they come in. (That will change next year.)
I think the idea that Tony should be on the hot seat in year 3 isn't really logical.