What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

If the games for DII schols would/could count in a DII/III format, then a potential unintended consequence is that Merrimack and AIC might drop down from DI to play in a non scholarship league.then the NE 10 could have their own league and possisibility an AQ.Lowell will not drop down and it is highly unlikely that Bentley would also join as it is pretty clear, that they want to follow Bryant to DI in all sports

It would also lead to a 12 team tournament.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Is a 12 team format ,a good or bad thing?and if expanded to 12,
would that help or hurt discussions with the MIAC,NCHA etc. over equal tournament oportunities?
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

I'd happily accept a 12-team tournament right now with the same format, no questions asked. A 12-team tourney >>>> 11-team tourney.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

If the games for DII schols would/could count in a DII/III format, then a potential unintended consequence is that Merrimack and AIC might drop down from DI to play in a non scholarship league.then the NE 10 could have their own league and possisibility an AQ.Lowell will not drop down and it is highly unlikely that Bentley would also join as it is pretty clear, that they want to follow Bryant to DI in all sports

Not sure if I could see Merrimack wanting to drop out of Hockey East to go play D3 Hockey. Sure, they might be a doormat there in HE, but its being a prestigious doormat in a pretty good D1 League.

First that I've heard of Bentley entertaining full D1 dreams.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Not sure if I could see Merrimack wanting to drop out of Hockey East to go play D3 Hockey. Sure, they might be a doormat there in HE, but its being a prestigious doormat in a pretty good D1 League

Merrimack has not had a winning season since they moved to DI.given the financials of the College,I am not sure if the "prestige" of being the doormat in HE justifies the cost of the being in a very competetive,well funded league,if you are not competetive or well funded.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

A total aside, FWIW 31 years ago I had a choice of taking a job at Ferris or at Norwich and I picked Norwich. What does this add to the discussion, nothing, but it's interesting to me, anyway :)

It means you were only willing to look at schools that had a hockey team.

No surprise to us.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

It looks like last year, the DII Management Council made a small step toward trying to get the DIII to accept the DII Ice Hockey teams as "equals".

From page 19 of 33:
Proposal No. 2-12––Amateurism and Eligibility—Participation in Major Junior A Ice Hockey Prior to Initial Collegiate Enrollment—Exceptions to Participation in Organized Competition—Men’s Ice Hockey.

Management Council. The Management Council agreed to take a position of support for this proposal. The Management Council agreed with the rationale of the Legislation Committee for support of this legislation.

Presidents Council. The Presidents Council agreed to take a position of support for this proposal. The Council agreed with the rationale of the Legislation Committee and Management Council for support of this legislation.

[Note that the Legislation Committee agreed to support this proposal. The committee noted that this proposal will provide equity between Division II institutions and Division III institutions, which a majority of the contests are played against. Providing an additional exception for men's ice hockey student-athletes does not give a competitive advantage because all six institutions that sponsor the sport participate as part of the same conference. In addition, the institutions make an effort to maintain competitive equity with their Division III counterparts and do not provide athletically related financial aid to their student-athletes.]
 
It looks like last year, the DII Management Council made a small step toward trying to get the DIII to accept the DII Ice Hockey teams as "equals".

From page 19 of 33:
Except that more than half of the hockey playing D-II schools play up. Plus passage of 2010-100 ended new playups. I wonder if its a good idea to have two sets of rules for the same division?

For example, Lindenwood decides to field a men's hockey team. By rule, they can no longer declare to play up. However, they can still play in the big boy's sandbox because D-II does not sponsor a hockey championship. The same is currently true for the current members of the NE-10.

The Saints remind me of the elderly child who refuses to leave the family nest. They need to get the boot and strike out on their own
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Except that more than half of the hockey playing D-II schools play up. Plus passage of 2010-100 ended new playups. I wonder if its a good idea to have two sets of rules for the same division?

For example, Lindenwood decides to field a men's hockey team. By rule, they can no longer declare to play up. However, they can still play in the big boy's sandbox because D-II does not sponsor a hockey championship. The same is currently true for the current members of the NE-10.

The Saints remind me of the elderly child who refuses to leave the family nest. They need to get the boot and strike out on their own

I've never understood the NCAA's stand on playing up - the old rules made sense to me - in fact, why can't a DII or DIII school decide it wants to play basketball or football at the DI level if they choose to. To me that would promote more of the "David and Goliath" drama that flows out of a small DI school making a run through the bloat ball field.

In any case, it you want a single rule here it is. "In any sport in which there is no DII sponsored championship, a school may opt to play for the DI or DIII championship. If they choose to play for the DIII championship, they must comply with all rules governing that sport at the DIII level, including, but not limited to schedules, recruiting, eligibility, and financial aid. If they opt to play for the DI national championship they will continue to be governed by applicable DII rules."

I have a few connections with St. Mike's they simply don't have the resources to support a program that wants to compete with the UVMs, RPIs, etc. They do want to preserve their DII basketball tradition which is very important to them.
 
Last edited:
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

I have a few connections with St. Mike's they simply don't have the resources to support a program that wants to compete with the UVMs, RPIs, etc. They do want to preserve their DII basketball tradition which is very important to them.

What tradition are they trying to preserve exactly? Does the fact that they give scholarships in basketball preclude the hockey team from playing down to D3? There is no way they could compete in D1.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

What tradition are they trying to preserve exactly? Does the fact that they give scholarships in basketball preclude the hockey team from playing down to D3? There is no way they could compete in D1.

Current NCAA rules allow them to play down - BUT - the results/statistics have very little impact on the D3 teams championsip aspirations - i.e. Only in the "The secondary criteria introduce results against out-of-region Division III and all other opponents including those contests versus opponents from other classifications (i.e., provisionals, NCAA Divisions I and II)".* That is the problem for DIII's if they take advantage of scheduling a local DII school to save travel expenses, encourage their fans to travel, etc, then they lose out a chance to improve their SOS, OWP, etc.

* Refer to page 45 of this.
 
Last edited:
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Norm, Au Contreur... When the ECAC-E/NESCAC interlock was in place, Middlebury and Norwich were travel partners, creating the dreaded 0 for Vermont weekends for the rest of the leagues. Now with Norwich & St. Mike's as travel partners there is less of a stress factor for visiting teams (and home teams facing this partnership), the results/statistics have impacted the asperations of all the former interlock teams, one way or another.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Norm, Au Contreur... When the ECAC-E/NESCAC interlock was in place, Middlebury and Norwich were travel partners, creating the dreaded 0 for Vermont weekends for the rest of the leagues. Now with Norwich & St. Mike's as travel partners there is less of a stress factor for visiting teams (and home teams facing this partnership), the results/statistics have impacted the asperations of all the former interlock teams, one way or another.

Actually, Peach, the Norwich - Midd pairing was in place when Midd (and the rest of the Muffy and Trevor clan) was part of the ECAC East. When the NESCAC became a league of its own, St. Mikes moved from the NE to the East side to balance out the move of Tufts from the NE to NESCAC and leave both leagues with 10 teams and produce the Interlock. At the same time, the NESCAC mandated that travel partners had to be from the same league. That meant that Middlebury would pair with Williams and Norwich would pair with the Purple Knights.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

Norm, Au Contreur... When the ECAC-E/NESCAC interlock was in place, Middlebury and Norwich were travel partners, creating the dreaded 0 for Vermont weekends for the rest of the leagues. Now with Norwich & St. Mike's as travel partners there is less of a stress factor for visiting teams (and home teams facing this partnership), the results/statistics have impacted the asperations of all the former interlock teams, one way or another.

I was refering to the impact of the DII/DIII matchups, NOT the old NESCAC/ECAC-East Interlock. Even without the formal interlock, games between Middlebury & Norwich (and ANY East Region DIII school) will still have the full effect on everything except in-conference results/statistics.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

I guess what I was trying to ask is, can the Saints play down and be considered an actual DIII program, eligible for playoffs etc (like Merrimack and other DII schools play up in one sport) or must a DII institution only play up to be eligible for post-season play?

I am sorry, I still do not understand this.
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

I guess what I was trying to ask is, can the Saints play down and be considered an actual DIII program, eligible for playoffs etc (like Merrimack and other DII schools play up in one sport) or must a DII institution only play up to be eligible for post-season play?

I am sorry, I still do not understand this.
No. You could only play UP (and then only to Division 1). Proposition 2010-100 killed new play-ups. If you play DOWN
(1) You are ineligible for post season play in that division
(2) Games against you do not count for post season selection

Now, if you're watching ESPNU right now, you're watching Union (Division III, Liberty League) play Mass-Lowell (Division II, Northeast 10) in a battle of play-ups to go to the Division I Frozen Four (tm).
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

No. You could only play UP (and then only to Division 1). Proposition 2010-100 killed new play-ups. If you play DOWN
(1) You are ineligible for post season play in that division
(2) Games against you do not count for post season selection

Now, if you're watching ESPNU right now, you're watching Union (Division III, Liberty League) play Mass-Lowell (Division II, Northeast 10) in a battle of play-ups to go to the Division I Frozen Four (tm).

Brucey's former school Union won 4-2 over Mass-Lowell, who blamed their loss on Brucey's former school - RIT!! :p
 
Re: Will the DII's ever get out of Limbo?

No. You could only play UP (and then only to Division 1). Proposition 2010-100 killed new play-ups. If you play DOWN
(1) You are ineligible for post season play in that division
(2) Games against you do not count for post season selection

Now, if you're watching ESPNU right now, you're watching Union (Division III, Liberty League) play Mass-Lowell (Division II, Northeast 10) in a battle of play-ups to go to the Division I Frozen Four (tm).

Thank you! I am FINALLY comprehending! So, my guess, fwiw (lol) is, eventually, St. A's could move up, to the Atlantic League perhaps? And St. Mikes? Who knows, if they are forced out of the ECAC-E, which will probably happen after next season right?

PS- I was, in fact watching the Union -UML game last night!
 
Back
Top