Why isn't Union #1?

[i'zonprize]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Well - I was going to just write- 'no they are 'Nott'!

But only he'd get it.

 

[The Rube]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AvKWHrdRcpE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[bronconick]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

The guy's title is "troll"

Isn't this pretty much clubbing a baby seal? Without the cute and cuddly part, that is.

 

[darker98]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AvKWHrdRcpE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Gets me everytime! LOL

 

[darker98]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

The guy's title is "troll"

Isn't this pretty much clubbing a baby seal? Without the cute and cuddly part, that is.

He's the worst Troller in the world. I don't think he got one bite. Less obvious would have been a good watch.

 

[SteveF]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Unions are currently under fire.

i, for one, hope union plays wisconsin for the national championship. obama can ref and glen beck can be the linesman

 

[UnionHockeyManiac]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

 

[unionbob]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

poles?

ok going to bring my accordian to the game next week ...think the band will let me sit in????

 

[Miami Ice]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Union hasn't won anything since the Civil War, etc. etc.

Wrong...they tied Navy in 1929 for the national championship in

lacrosse.

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

poles?

ok going to bring my accordian to the game next week ...think the band will let me sit in????

Union has a band? And their half-a'd attempt at the RPI game in 2008-09 doesn't count.

 

[Union93]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Win, lose or draw, the Dutch are #1 in my book.

 

[Chickens@NU]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Three more threads until he gets banned. What say you?

26 total posts, and exactly three more threads after this one was started... and then BANISHMENT! I think you've spent way too much time on these message boards Dirty.

 

[Rhett]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

26 total posts, and exactly three more threads after this one was started... and then BANISHMENT! I think you've spent way too much time on these message boards Dirty.

I took the over, but I think he lasted longer than even I thought he would. He ruined by my prediction when he veered off from starting and abandoning threads to actually "replying" to them.

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

26 total posts, and exactly three more threads after this one was started... and then BANISHMENT! I think you've spent way too much time on these message boards Dirty.

26 posts? Did anyone else think of the irony of this given the team to which he/she supports?

 

[Ralph Baer]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

26 posts? Did anyone else think of the irony of this given the team to which he/she supports?

I did immediately, and I started to post but decided not to.

 

[manurespreader]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Are you sure this guy is not from Ylae.?

 

[state of hockey]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Did it ever occur to anyone that it might have been Dirty?

 

[bigmrg74]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Did it ever occur to anyone that it might have been Dirty?

My money would have him being Pretty in Sioux.

 

[Dirty]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Did it ever occur to anyone that it might have been Dirty?

Well I did like his style.....

 

[Kepler]

Re: Why isn't Union #1?

Are you sure this guy is not from Ylae.?

For one thing, lack of double punctuation.