What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

This GDP report is a lot like attendance at a campus arena. The number of butts in seats is never announced attendance.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Funny how there's no inflation when libs talk about GDP growth, but when discussing wages (minimum or otherwise), we have a crises on our hands because they're stagnated or even falling relative to inflation...

Funny how a very smart guy is comparing a debate about 6 years of GDP growth (with little inflation) with a debate about 40 years of wage stagnation (with high inflation).
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

My best friend from high school is, among other things, a musician, a genius, possibly a high functioning sociopath (stop me if you've heard this before), a Perotista (OK, so not a genius in everything), and a gold bug (ibid.), and occasionally he sends me pieces from that Dark Side. Of these, the David Stockman stuff always kind of creeps me out, because the guy is obviously smart, connected, and very p1ssed off. This is one of those. Happy New Year and I'll see you in our 2015 shanty town.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

My best friend from high school is, among other things, a musician, a genius, possibly a high functioning sociopath (stop me if you've heard this before), a Perotista (OK, so not a genius in everything), and a gold bug (ibid.), and occasionally he sends me pieces from that Dark Side. Of these, the David Stockman stuff always kind of creeps me out, because the guy is obviously smart, connected, and very p1ssed off. This is one of those. Happy New Year and I'll see you in our 2015 shanty town.

I couldn't get past the first paragraph. Tax cut? Does he understand how property taxes work? Or was he just being cheeky?
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Ok. I can now proceed with the rest of the article.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Only the highest quality of junk for our teachers!
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Yeah, that's a very astute observation of a very sad state of affairs these days: "While I may be a murderer, at least I'm not a serial killer, like they are" pretty much sums up a great deal of "dialog" these days. :(

It isn't "these days." Humans have always had the same cognitive biases -- our brains are biological and imperfect, and every idea we've ever had had risen from our brains' interpretation of the world. That's why historical analysis and statistical collection are important but can still be abused. They do not provide "answers" but do help provide a source of support for hypotheses which does not just come from the "gut reaction" 90% of people use to make their judgments (judgments which themselves are barely separable from the prejudices handed down to them by their parents and peers).
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

I'm still trying to process that Louisiana has teachers.

Putting their money into junk bonds, that has to make people think about other pensions out there that give projections based upon X% return annually on stocks and bonds. While stocks are going to have a certain amount of fluctuations, the bond portfolios are supposed to be a reliable method of attaining income for the funds. With bond prices being so high due to interest rates being extremely low, Louisiana's teacher pension fund might be the first in a long line of pension funds looking to make up for sagging ROIs and therefore falling out of federal compliance.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Putting their money into junk bonds, that has to make people think about other pensions out there that give projections based upon X% return annually on stocks and bonds. While stocks are going to have a certain amount of fluctuations, the bond portfolios are supposed to be a reliable method of attaining income for the funds. With bond prices being so high due to interest rates being extremely low, Louisiana's teacher pension fund might be the first in a long line of pension funds looking to make up for sagging ROIs and therefore falling out of federal compliance.

I thought there were firewalls between public pensions and junk debt. I guess Wall Street must have bribed those away too.

What would you rather have, a lower return than the magic 8% or OBVIOUS DEFAULT IS OBVIOUS?
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

It's time to do away with defined benefit pensions and put everyone on a 401(k) plan with a defined contribution pension.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Putting their money into junk bonds, that has to make people think about other pensions out there that give projections based upon X% return annually on stocks and bonds. While stocks are going to have a certain amount of fluctuations, the bond portfolios are supposed to be a reliable method of attaining income for the funds. With bond prices being so high due to interest rates being extremely low, Louisiana's teacher pension fund might be the first in a long line of pension funds looking to make up for sagging ROIs and therefore falling out of federal compliance.
The other thing is that it is a relatively small percentage of their portfolio. $325 mil out of about $14.7 billion in total funds. I personally think prudent investing requires you to put a very small % of your funds into what we might describe as higher risk/reward investments.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

The other thing is that it is a relatively small percentage of their portfolio. $325 mil out of about $14.7 billion in total funds. I personally think prudent investing requires you to put a very small % of your funds into what we might describe as higher risk/reward investments.

This is bad advice. High risk is single mad-cap or small-cap stocks. Not junk bonds. Especially when it comes to retirement funds.

Junk bonds are junk and should he avoided completely.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

I thought there were firewalls between public pensions and junk debt. I guess Wall Street must have bribed those away too.

What would you rather have, a lower return than the magic 8% or OBVIOUS DEFAULT IS OBVIOUS?
I don't know if they exist or not, and if they did on what grounds they're not applied anymore. Perhaps the law only applied to federal pensions and then other state and local pensions followed suit as more a rule than a law. I know that the government invests in them on a semi-regular basis, but that's more of a political thing and not used within its pension funds.

My bet is that the LA teachers pension would have a rule stating that X% equity, Y% debt. If the Y% is falling short of its ROI, then they're getting creative so that the taxpayers don't have to shell out more cash in order to get that pension back to the point of being considered fully funded. While I'm not big on junk bonds, I do know that there are some very savvy investors out there that make a nice living exclusively trading them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top