What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Sure - it works like this - the GOP prevented the worst of the excesses from the Democratic (senate) majority and administration from taking effect. This allowed the economy to grow without massive government interference.

See? It's all how you spin.....

Like how the Republicans voted down Obamacare and thus prevented the apocalyptic increases in health costs and massive decreases in coverage and quality of care that would have happened immediately after its adoption, right?
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

I'm pretty sure that's the rule of both sides.

No. Elizabeth Warren for example. Paul Wellstone (RIP). Bernie Sanders. Etc, etc.

Notice none of them tend to be GOP? I sure do.

Meanwhile the way is now clear for the ONLY Bone Man and Mitch the Turtle's jobs bill in existence.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/u...icmst=1409232722000&bicmet=1419773522000&_r=0

Nebraska Justices Back Pipeline; Now Obama Must Decide
 
Last edited:
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

So energy has taken it on the chin. $46 per barrel. I'm a big environmental guy, but its hard to not like cheap oil. It helps the economy and it helps the economy. Stock market gets jittery because its the unknown...but it helps the economy.

But to hear the oil companies complain. They're having to think about lay offs (this after being the most profitable companies in the world just a few years back). The travesty. And somehow, saving every family thousands every year will be swamped by some unemployed in the energy sector. And now those that freaked out when we needed to bail out banks to stop the economy from total collapse...are saying we should bail out big oil.

Why Big Oil Needs a Bailout in New OPEC Price War

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/12/15/Why-Big-Oil-Needs-Bailout-New-OPEC-Price-War
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Maps in today's WaPo on where Social Security goes. Interesting info on disability payments in there, too.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...in-four-maps/?tid=HP_business?tid=HP_business

"The states with the highest percentage of people age 18-64 on disability in the U.S. are West Virginia (where the number is nearly 1 in 10), Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maine, Tennessee, South Carolina and Missouri. "

All Red states except for Maine. Coincidence? I don't think so...
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

"The states with the highest percentage of people age 18-64 on disability in the U.S. are West Virginia (where the number is nearly 1 in 10), Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maine, Tennessee, South Carolina and Missouri. "

All Red states except for Maine. Coincidence? I don't think so...
It's an Institution to be on disability in West Virginia.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

"The states with the highest percentage of people age 18-64 on disability in the U.S. are West Virginia (where the number is nearly 1 in 10), Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maine, Tennessee, South Carolina and Missouri. "

All Red states except for Maine. Coincidence? I don't think so...

Their leaders are con artists; makes sense their voters are too.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

It's an Institution to be on disability in West Virginia.

The 30+ people in this film were all on welfare. That and prescription fraud is their entire culture. Basically the Palins with a little more class.
 
Last edited:
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Big Oil doesn't need a bailout, but we need to be careful in how close we take them to the brink. (Hint: They're still a long ways from the edge.)
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Their leaders are con artists; makes sense their voters are too.

I spent a day in a workers comp clinic. Can honestly say it was one of the worst days of my life. No amount of money would sway me to be the physician in that.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

But to hear the oil companies complain. They're having to think about lay offs (this after being the most profitable companies in the world just a few years back). The travesty. And somehow, saving every family thousands every year will be swamped by some unemployed in the energy sector. And now those that freaked out when we needed to bail out banks to stop the economy from total collapse...are saying we should bail out big oil.

Have them buy up as much as they can, and keep it off the market. Less on the market will raise prices. When prices rise, then they can sell it. Problem solved.

Or they can keep siting around and whining while watching their oh so fragile companies crumble. It'd make for more entertainment.
 
"The states with the highest percentage of people age 18-64 on disability in the U.S. are West Virginia (where the number is nearly 1 in 10), Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maine, Tennessee, South Carolina and Missouri. "

All Red states except for Maine. Coincidence? I don't think so...
Or they realize that disabled does not count towards unemployment and some other pot pays the bills.
 
Re: Weaving the Strands: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 2.0

Have them buy up as much as they can, and keep it off the market. Less on the market will raise prices. When prices rise, then they can sell it. Problem solved.

Or they can keep siting around and whining while watching their oh so fragile companies crumble. It'd make for more entertainment.
You want the oil producers to purchase a huge share of their own product? That's about the oddest thing I've ever read here. Why wouldn't they just keep their product in the ground? Then they're not paying people to take it out of the ground only to not take it to market, and they wouldn't have to pay for storage. The company owners aren't in the business to operate as charities.
 
You want the oil producers to purchase a huge share of their own product? That's about the oddest thing I've ever read here. Why wouldn't they just keep their product in the ground? Then they're not paying people to take it out of the ground only to not take it to market, and they wouldn't have to pay for storage. The company owners aren't in the business to operate as charities.
You realize this is a vast USA - Saudi conspiracy to bring the Russian economy to its knees, don't you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top