What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I'm not convinced that ASU is a long-term drag on any conference. I think that lacking a conference hurts them, and the facilities issue hurts them. If they can address those two things, they can probably recruit with anyone. Even if only 10% of college recruits want a warm climate in a larger city, all 10% go to Phoenix. Who else is there that competes in that context? The other 59 schools split the 90%. I say within 3 years of getting a rink and joining a conference (big unknowns at this point), ASU becomes a perennial contender. If I were the WCHA or NCHC, I'd get them in. They wouldn't be the only conference with an odd number of teams. Computers make scheduling easy.

You do know that they were invited by the WCHA and they rejected that invitation.
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

You don’t have to agree with the numerous points I’ve made as to why I think Minnesota State would benefit from joining the NCHC, but they are well documented throughout this thread. :)

I for one agree with all the points you've made. I'm convinced you would benefit by being with the Nachos and from MSUs perspective it's a no brainer. But what I haven't heard is what MSU brings to the Nachos and why they should approve your application. There has to be more to it than ensuring an even number of league teams if/when ASU gets in. What's the benefit to the non-Minnesota schools who currently make up more than half the league? Why Mankato?
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I for one agree with all the points you've made. I'm convinced you would benefit by being with the Nachos and from MSUs perspective it's a no brainer. But what I haven't heard is what MSU brings to the Nachos and why they should approve your application. There has to be more to it than ensuring an even number of league teams if/when ASU gets in. What's the benefit to the non-Minnesota schools who currently make up more than half the league? Why Mankato?
Well the only teams that I would think wouldn't vote for MSU is Miami and WMU...unless UND, SCSU, UMD, UNO want to keep the status quo for short NC travel.
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

Let's just call it what it is and name the next thread:

WCHA Season Thread 2018-19: In which Mankato kisses the WCHA good-bye...
and receives a reality check about the NCHC and the grass being greener in other places.

:)
Ryan
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

Let's just call it what it is and name the next thread:

WCHA Season Thread 2018-19: In which Mankato kisses the WCHA good-bye...
and receives a reality check about the NCHC and the grass being greener in other places.

:)
Ryan
^^^^ THIS ^^^^


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I honestly don't believe Mankato is leaving the WCHA. However, like any good engineer, I wanted to do my research. So I contacted the MSU athletics department and asked if there was any truth to the rumors. They told me, they are absolutely true, and that they are already working on a give-away item for their first home game next season. I guess this is much more serious than I had imagined. They really do plan to leave. Seemed kind of cheap that they expect fans to buy the accessory framing tray on their own dime, but you can't be thinking about your fans if you're in the NCHC. You just need to focus on making a lot of money and being "like minded". At least they are being realistic and good humored about the conference change.

Ryan

<img src="http://www.johnsonsjerseys.net/temp/doormat.jpg">

PS Yes, I know that Fuchsia isn't currently one of your official team colors. However, fans are going to be surprised to learn that the university agreed to make this change as part of being accepted to the NCHC. I feel like UND really put the screws to MSU just to see how badly they wanted to get in by making that change part of the joining agreement.
 
Last edited:
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

Boy, if a team can win the MacNaughton 3 out of 5 years, the Broadmoor 2 out of 5, never finish lower than 3rd, and win at least one playoff series in each of the 5 years of the nWCHA, but would be a doormat in another conference, the rest of you guys must be really terrible!
 
Boy, if a team can win the MacNaughton 3 out of 5 years, the Broadmoor 2 out of 5, never finish lower than 3rd, and win at least one playoff series in each of the 5 years of the nWCHA, but would be a doormat in another conference, the rest of you guys must be really terrible!

Remind me how great is your team against NaCHo teams the last couple of years? And, just how great you are in the NCAA's...
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I'm not sure they'd be doormats in the NCHC, but they could kiss seeing any home playoff games goodbye, that's for sure.
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I'm not sure they'd be doormats in the NCHC, but they could kiss seeing any home playoff games goodbye, that's for sure.
I'd guess a consistent finish in the middle 1/3 of the NCHC and occasional NCAA one-and-outs.

It's not like they could hold onto the WCHA Championship game anyway.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

That's because it's hard to toot the Mavs horn when your lips are firmly planted on the NCHC's ***

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I noodled on this in the MSU-M offseason topic, but a consideration is that the NCHC plays a 24-game schedule, which allows them to play more games OOC. Half of the league's teams raised their overall record in OOC play, and that didn't include the top two teams. If you go to beating each other up more and have fewer chances to schedule stronger NC teams, your PWR is probably going to take a hit.

GFM
 
Last edited:
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

I noodled on this in the MSU-M offseason topic, but a consideration is that the NCHC plays a 20-game schedule, which allows them to play more games OOC. Half of the league's teams raised their overall record in OOC play, and that didn't include the top two teams. If you go to beating each other up more and have fewer chances to schedule stronger NC teams, your PWR is probably going to take a hit.

GFM

24-game...vs WCHA 28

EDIT: and the NCHC doesn't gain the exempt games that the WCHA gets, even though it is hard with the current playoff format to actually use all of them...
 
Last edited:
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

24-game...vs WCHA 28

EDIT: and the NCHC doesn't gain the exempt games that the WCHA gets, even though it is hard with the current playoff format to actually use all of them...

Thanks for the correction.

GFM
 
24-game...vs WCHA 28

EDIT: and the NCHC doesn't gain the exempt games that the WCHA gets, even though it is hard with the current playoff format to actually use all of them...

Except when the NCHC teams travel to Alaska, which they have done with some regularity. UND, St. Cloud, DU, Omaha, and Western Michigan have all gone to either Fairbanks or Anchorage since the split.
 
Re: WCHA Season Thread 2017-18: In Which We Try For Two Bids

Two things....I'm not sure this is different than any other sport at any other level. MSU's paid attendance is actually up approximately from the old WCHA, but we are also winning nearly double the amount of games AND tickets are cheaper. It's not an issue right now, but it certainly could be in the future.

Secondly, you're leaving out a very key component that I covered. We don't have any REAL rivals in the conference. That's not to say that we don't have any competition, so please don't take it that way. We just don't have anyone that moves the meter because we don't have any other connections other than the conference.

As goofy as it may be, there is a reason that the NHL changed their playoff format so that teams are playing division and geographical rivals in the first round. It's because location, rivals and who you are playing make a difference. You can say that's sad, but the reality is that the casual fans are the ones that can make your revenues go up or down. Casual fans care about different things than what those of us that post on these message boards care about. Who your team plays, makes a difference.

Sorry for being late to the thread. I spent a good amount of my childhood around Mankato and have a Dad who is a grad from there. There are a lot of systemic issues with MSU an why it will always be a challenge to be a hockey school:

MSU is Southern Minnesota's University. Southern MN is not known for their love of hockey. I grew up 1 hour north of Mankato and I don't recall a notable "plains" high school hockey team outside of the Mankato and Metro area. Ok, maybe Rochester. Northern MN was loaded with great hockey teams. Go down around I-90, how many people can skate? They have more in common with Iowa (A non hockey school) than they do SCSU, UMD, and North Dakota. How many towns have hockey rinks? If they do, how busy are they?

When I was a kid, MSU was not known for athletics. When I went to Tech and told my dad we were playing Minnesota State, his response was "We have a hockey team?" He was an athlete and can tell you all about the athletes he spent time with in college, but overall is not a big sports fan. He knew MSU had a great gymnastics, football and soccer program. Hockey, clueless. (I know I didn't go D1 until later) He knew about the Gophers, UMD, SCSU and North Dakota's hockey program. That is going to take a long time to correct.

Your very nice rink is not on campus. I don't care what sport it is, that always kills student attendance/energy.

I don't mean to trash MSU, but somethings are hard to overcome.

For recruits, are guys signing significant pro contracts? Look at Tech's undrafted players. They are going to the ECHL and AHL out of school, with a few flirting with the NHL. By your mentality, MSU shouldn't bother recruiting guys like Brickley or Knutson. They weren't drafted so they must suck.

I fell MTU and MSU have a good rivalry. We are usually fighting for top spot in the WCHA. Our games usually mean something. I think we all wish the lower schools were better. That has to come from them. Like every team, MSU can only worry about what they can control.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top