Why? The award is for his high school achievements. Not sure why it's the Star Tribune's job to discuss your program's recruiting. Sure, they could have probably mentioned where he was going to play for college. I am sure HE would have appreciated that, but your take on the number of finalists heading to UNO is a bit overblown.
If this were 5 years ago, having 4 of the Minnesota Mr. Hockey finalists would mean a whole lot more. You've got to consider the players who would have been eligible to win the award, but forewent their senior season to play with the NTDP (Glover, Dougherty, Gersich) or the USHL (Sheehy, Hurley, etc..). There were roughly 30 players who left MN high school hockey early to play juniors, and a number of other players who have played all of their hockey at programs like Shattuck, who would probably have been a factor.
It's a nice award, and I am glad Peterson was rewarded for coming back for his senior season, but the award just isn't the same as it used to be. Minnesota high school hockey isn't quite the same, and is still changing. A larger and larger percentage of this state's top players aren't hanging around until their senior season to win the award.
Not saying the recruits you landed aren't good (Peterson is a Wild draft pick and we are excited about him too). Just explaining the reality of MNHS hockey these days. Sad to see, but probably inevitable. It will still be a fun and competitive league, but will probably become more and more of a younger player's league. And since the Mr Hockey award is handed out to the top senior player, that award will mean less and less.