Re: Union College Hockey 2014-2015 "ReUnion 2015? Why "Nott"?
A feature on Matt Wilkins, who has had a breakout season:
http://bit.ly/1L3dlkZ
A feature on Matt Wilkins, who has had a breakout season:
http://bit.ly/1L3dlkZ
It was blatant. Just a lack of discipline at that moment. Bennett was actually shaking his head in disbelief.Too many men on the ice with a minute to go? How much did they pay the refs?
Looked to me that the open net was like a magnet to them, trying to get the clear shot from 180' away.As for the 6 on 5 and 6 on 4 at then end, why do we not ice the puck ? We get possession at least 3 or 4 times and we try to be cute. Who cares ? they are all over us, outplaying us and we are being totally dominated. Ice the **** puck !!!!! But no, we get cute, and they scored gorgeous goals.
It was blatant. Just a lack of discipline at that moment. Bennett was actually shaking his head in disbelief.
Looked to me that the open net was like a magnet to them, trying to get the clear shot from 180' away.
That kill definitely woke us up. Seemed to deflate Union as well.The killer to me was not scoring on the 2-man PP for a full two minutes in the second period. Already up 2-0, if they score once there, it's a different game.
That kill definitely woke us up. Seemed to deflate Union as well.
I have to admit, when you went up 3-1 I thought it was lights out.
Very good game by U for about 50 minutes and then Q turned it up a notch.. kudos to them, that's what good teams do. As others noted, a couple of key opportunities to ice the puck at the end might have been the difference. But was very happy with the play of the young players, particularly the D-men. They stood up Q at the blueline early and forced them to take some chances they don't normally take and then converted. Also another excellent game by Stevo. All around it was a fantastic game to watch even with the unhappy ending for U.The main difference this weekend is that U could play very well and do most everything right.. and still lose.