HockeyRef
Well-known member
Re: UNH Wildcats-The Back Nine and Beyond!
Interestingly most of the commentary after the game I heard was 'we played better tonight'. Personally and FWIW I wasn't overly thrilled with the weekend play despite putting up the 5 goals on Friday (loved the Gildon hattie) and I agree with you with the play last night. Seemed like lots of disconnect here and there and we did have chances that just didn't go our way. Not for a lack of effort. Not scoring on 2/ 5 on 3 opps props to CC's PK. Puck possession was often torturous at times; hard to get, hard to keep. Lots of shots coming from nowhere it seemed in desperation (and that wasn't toward the end when we needed to get the tie). I think you are going to see that when you shake stuff up. D wise...missed Wyse terribly. Reading the papers this morning my comments mean squat but that's just a fans view. Still...what a start and you can't argue with that.
I guess we'll need to be ready for UVM and settle some things down. Season is still young and I suspect they are figuring some things out. What you described is what happens when things get mixed with players out, and players in. BUT having Grasso back is a good thing, no doubt about that. Here's hoping the Eiserman knee issue is able to resolve; hard to say he was limping but he's a gamer. I'm looking for cohesive lines for Vermont.
Not sure I agree with the 'thin on talent' comment although you could see what happens when a couple of vital players are out. The pieces will have to fit better in my early view. I'm keeping in mind the season is young and the start has been fantastic! We've got two new Dmen (Maas and Gildon) who are looking to hit their NCAA stride. Gildon is a coachable kid and he's only going to get better in his D. As the competition gets stiffer, then we know what we got in a broader scope. Just my .02 on that. It was good to see you guys btw. And on a final note? Thought DT had a great weekend.
Ps...too many whistles last night. Just sayin'. Zip flow.
So, was that a self-inflicted wound, or a reminder of how thin the talent is on this team? It felt like a bit of both. Without Wyse it felt pretty scary on D most of the time. And yet, Gildon/Marks were on the ice for both goals. Hmmmm. Without Eiserman, it looked like Vela was playing by himself. He was all over the place doing everything to generate some O, but the other two couldn’t seem to get on the same page or provide support.
Given that the first two changes were uncontrollable, was it smart to mess with Blackburn’s line, even though it was Grasso returning? Should he have been thrown into Eiserman’s slot to leave Blackburn’s line intact until the sophs could have a week of practice? Note that I am assuming the lines we saw last night are the ones that practiced all week. Continuing on this Monday morning tack, was it wise to mess with the chemistry of the fourth line on the same night the other changes were also occurring? Sato was great fun to watch, but the fourth line had none of the effectiveness tonight that we saw in the first five games.
With all the fiddling, only the first line was intact, and they looked pretty ineffective all night, at least in the offensive end.
They had to address a D pairing and one line, but with a Grasso for Eiserman sub, it could have been limited to that. Why mess with three out of four lines?
OK, that’s enough whining.
Let’s get back to winning.![]()
Interestingly most of the commentary after the game I heard was 'we played better tonight'. Personally and FWIW I wasn't overly thrilled with the weekend play despite putting up the 5 goals on Friday (loved the Gildon hattie) and I agree with you with the play last night. Seemed like lots of disconnect here and there and we did have chances that just didn't go our way. Not for a lack of effort. Not scoring on 2/ 5 on 3 opps props to CC's PK. Puck possession was often torturous at times; hard to get, hard to keep. Lots of shots coming from nowhere it seemed in desperation (and that wasn't toward the end when we needed to get the tie). I think you are going to see that when you shake stuff up. D wise...missed Wyse terribly. Reading the papers this morning my comments mean squat but that's just a fans view. Still...what a start and you can't argue with that.
I guess we'll need to be ready for UVM and settle some things down. Season is still young and I suspect they are figuring some things out. What you described is what happens when things get mixed with players out, and players in. BUT having Grasso back is a good thing, no doubt about that. Here's hoping the Eiserman knee issue is able to resolve; hard to say he was limping but he's a gamer. I'm looking for cohesive lines for Vermont.
Not sure I agree with the 'thin on talent' comment although you could see what happens when a couple of vital players are out. The pieces will have to fit better in my early view. I'm keeping in mind the season is young and the start has been fantastic! We've got two new Dmen (Maas and Gildon) who are looking to hit their NCAA stride. Gildon is a coachable kid and he's only going to get better in his D. As the competition gets stiffer, then we know what we got in a broader scope. Just my .02 on that. It was good to see you guys btw. And on a final note? Thought DT had a great weekend.
Ps...too many whistles last night. Just sayin'. Zip flow.
Last edited: