Well, that's fair. I'm not going to argue about it. (the faceoff play was the year before - I wasn't using it as part of any argument - I was just saying that we understand there has been a lot of heartbreak. That same night was the game when the ref skated over to Parker before he pulled the goalie one down against Michigan and said "You better not leave the bench early." As soon as Parker pulled the goalie he called too many men on the ice - talk about pre-meditated).
I get the animosity towards BU. I have a hard time with it sometimes, but I understand. Personally, if there is any team I would like to see win the whole thing (if it isn't us) is UNH. I was just basically explaining the scenario for those who weren't aware of the process at that time. IMO, the committee choosing BU in '78 wasn't "wrong" - they had that option. The fact that they were probably wrong in '74 doesn't have any bearing on what happened four years later, but I get it. I know people hate it when someone says "I know how you feel," so I won't say that.
So, in closing, it wasn't a lot of verbiage to "excuse" what happened, because they didn't need an excuse. It was within the rules. Was the committee's "authority" inconsistently wielded? Yes. And that's probably ultimately why the whole pairwise thing evolved, to take ALL of the subjectivity out of it. I don't want to harp on this and I'm not trying to be antagonistic (I've done plenty of that on other threads). I was just trying to answer his question.
I feel like the Patriots fans in 2000 who said that they finally got "payback" for Ben Dreith and the roughing the passer call against the Raiders. I know a lot of people out there are happy that BU blew this. Whatever. I can't control what others think. It is what it is. Personally I don't revel in other people's disappointment or failures. Resentment is a very negative emotion and usually doesn't result in much good. I'm not speaking directly to you...just to the incredible display of euphoria by all the BU haters. It's a little over the top to me. I'm sorry, but I was surrounded by North Dakota, Lowell, Cornell, Harvard and BC fans. They were NOT cheering FOR Providence. They were cheering AGAINST BU. So if I sound defensive, after 45 years of going to these games, it takes its toll.![]()
Correct. Nerves. They didn't react to almost anything the rest of the game because they were still in shock. The bigger question mark is why Eichel even TOOK the draw. He had lost every draw in the period up to that point (and it's not one of his strong points anyway). And after he lost it he didn't even go after the man. He just froze. They all froze. They were done after that previous goal and we all knew it. And in reference to the bolded words above, it's NOT the same. It just isn't. You can't compare the two.
So my response would be that Quinn did what most coaches do...he reverts back to what he has the most confidence in. You try to keep things as familiar as possible in pressure situations. As he said after the game (and I paraphrase) "The one thing we needed in that situation was the one thing we didn't have - experience." You can't teach experience in anything in life. You have to live it. And it's a good thing, too, because if that were not the case, a lot of us that are my age (over 30) wouldn't have jobs.
But leading up to the game I told many people who were hockey fans but had little more than a casual interest in the game that BU had flaws defensively, from the goalie on out. And these flaws could come back to bite them. And they did, at the worst possible time. Reminds me of Brian Boyle playing defense for BC when they lost to Michigan St. in 2007. I remember sitting next to an old time BC fan in Manchester while the Eagles were playing. His take was that York could get away with playing Boyle on defense but, at some point, it would come back and bite him. And it did, at the worst possible time.
Regarding Eichel, I saw him enough this year to know that he needs to improve defensively. Let's just say that Claude Julien would have worries about him. So, question. Does he stay or does he go? Since there is precedent for #2 picks staying (Toews and JVR) in college it might not be a slam dunk. I guess it comes down to how big the bonus is.
And I will reiterate, I was not rooting against BU vs. PC. But leading up to the game I told many people who were hockey fans but had little more than a casual interest in the game that BU had flaws defensively, from the goalie on out. And these flaws could come back to bite them. And they did, at the worst possible time. Reminds me of Brian Boyle playing defense for BC when they lost to Michigan St. in 2007. I remember sitting next to an old time BC fan in Manchester while the Eagles were playing. His take was that York could get away with playing Boyle on defense but, at some point, it would come back and bite him. And it did, at the worst possible time.
I know there are people out their saying that "an experienced team would have regained their composure and found a way to win." Really? Have any of those people seen a "goal" like what happened. Have you? I have never seen anything like that in 50 years of watching hockey. Did they not cover on that faceoff? Sure. Were they still in complete shock (timeout or no timeout)? What do you think?
I have watched BU more than a couple times this year and I thought they had significant issues on D and in goal, offense covered well most of the year. The D seemed to be a combination of young D-men and disinterested stretches in the D zone by (young) forwards. I felt that was why many times BU need a crazy come back, 40 minutes of disinterested D-zone play can cause that. It seemed that late in the year the skaters had a handle on the 60-min and play in there own end, not amazing but good enough. O'Connor never seemed on, in 3 years I am not sure he has ever been the goalie to win you a game. Seems like every game I have seen he gives up a soft goal. Seemingly good position but just not good at the details, handling the puck, getting down at the right time, consistent rebound control, etc. I would describe him as a big guy that can read a play. Put it this way if I was a pro scout I wouldn't be interested.
As to the play itself. When I watch the reply I am not sure O'Connor was ever sure the puck was in his glove. It looked like from the moment he caught the puck he was looking for it. He even said he didn't see it in his glove, most goalies don't look for it in the glove they just know it is there. His entire set of reactions look like a goalie with no clue where the puck went, even to the point of going down and getting big at the goal line and ultimately pushing the puck in the net. I am not sure anyone can say what really happened in that moment, at this point even for O'Connor it is probably a nonsensical blur.
From "that" goal on Saturday night it seem inevitable PC was going to win. Honestly on Thursday North Dakota just ran out of time, another 5-10 (game) minutes of that game and BU doesn't make the Championship. ND just dug to deep a hole.
Regardless, you gotta think Coach Quinn will learn and probably avoid putting too many eggs in one (goalie) basket in the future. He really did not have an option of pulling the kid at that juncture. Considering the rave reviews he's gotten for his recruiting in recent years, it seems in retrospect like he missed an important piece of the puzzle.
Agreed JB. I didn't see the previous two BU tourney games when O'Connor apparently let up a pair of other catastrophic goals. So it's even less surprising it happened again. My impression from what I'd seen previously from him was that he was a weak link back there, but the BU defense wasn't doing him any favors with their overall defensive zone coverage. And as others have pointed out since, it's one of those things that sometimes you can slide by with, but it will eventually catch up with you at some point - probably at the worst time.
Regardless, you gotta think Coach Quinn will learn and probably avoid putting too many eggs in one (goalie) basket in the future. He really did not have an option of pulling the kid at that juncture. Considering the rave reviews he's gotten for his recruiting in recent years, it seems in retrospect like he missed an important piece of the puzzle.
If O'Connor were in a UNH jersey for the past 3 years, you guys would have been putting up Hobey campaigns for him. Basically, he is like BU's version of Mike Ayers, the only difference being one couldn't stop a beach ball in the 3rd period of the NCAA title game and the other caught the ball the threw it into his own net.![]()
Agreed JB. I didn't see the previous two BU tourney games when O'Connor apparently let up a pair of other catastrophic goals.
I have watched BU more than a couple times this year and I thought they had significant issues on D and in goal, offense covered well most of the year. The D seemed to be a combination of young D-men and disinterested stretches in the D zone by (young) forwards. I felt that was why many times BU need a crazy come back, 40 minutes of disinterested D-zone play can cause that. It seemed that late in the year the skaters had a handle on the 60-min and play in there own end, not amazing but good enough. O'Connor never seemed on, in 3 years I am not sure he has ever been the goalie to win you a game. Seems like every game I have seen he gives up a soft goal. Seemingly good position but just not good at the details, handling the puck, getting down at the right time, consistent rebound control, etc. I would describe him as a big guy that can read a play. Put it this way if I was a pro scout I wouldn't be interested.
When UNH beat BU 4-3 on February 15th at the Whittemore Center, O'Connor gave up 3 goals by the midway point of the second period and was replaced by LeCouvee. On the first UNH goal, the young BU defenders did not cover Shane Eiserman and O'Connor didn't look like he was on top of his game:
https://youtu.be/PCEuv8jYSQY
When UNH beat BU 4-3 on February 15th at the Whittemore Center, O'Connor gave up 3 goals by the midway point of the second period and was replaced by LeCouvee. On the first UNH goal, the young BU defenders did not cover Shane Eiserman and O'Connor didn't look like he was on top of his game:
https://youtu.be/PCEuv8jYSQY
If O'Connor were in a UNH jersey for the past 3 years, you guys would have been putting up Hobey campaigns for him. Basically, he is like BU's version of Mike Ayers, the only difference being one couldn't stop a beach ball in the 3rd period of the NCAA title game and the other caught the ball the threw it into his own net.![]()
Posted by buoldtimer:
Has anyone met Hokydad? Does anyone know his background?
Given his strong opinions and the confidence with which he dispenses his insights and information, I must surmise that hockey is his livelihood.
Posted by Deuce:
He's the father of PC's 7th D.