Chuck, you're going soft. I'll fault Huddleston for his description since it is one of his talking points as to why this project is worthwhile. As I've said, I am not a NH resident but I have several good friends in the Seacoast area, friends who live near Keene, and my wife is orginally from North Conway. I think I am safe in saying that the NH residents who live in the southwest corner of the state, those who live in the Lakes region, or up in the MWV were not part of the palapability study. They will read about this "investment" and, no doubt, will react the way they have to the University over the 40 years I have been observing UNH's perception around the state. As I said below, I am afraid Mr. Huddleston, like so many of his predecessors , is going to be a short termer. Spending money is anathema to New Hampshire voters in general, spending money on UNH even more so. You ignore the pooh bahs in Concord at your peril.I've often wondered if the attitude towards UNH would have been different if a 100 years ago the main campus was built somewhere in the middle of the state and not in Durham. Maybe not but it is worth pondering.
Well, Concord (and about a zillion other naysayers, including the bastion of logical thought, the New Hampshire), were roundly ignored during the PTP process. The result? Even before the school was delivered, the applicant pool grew materially in both volume and quality. Had they listened to the apparently brilliant minds of Concord (oh, and the profs union and the NH, etc.,), it wouldn't have happened and the B-School would still have 30% less capacity in an overstuffed building with leaking ceilings.
Oh, and the new Comm's school, whose construction was a serendipitous outgrowth of PTP's benevolence, might not have happened.
As a taxpayer in NH from1983-1990, and now again since 2000 (hope Dover is making the most of my property tax - haven't set foot there since 2011, and am in NH all of about 10 days a year) and and alum, I'm couldn't be happier with the concept. As are my mother, relatives and friends in Peterborough, Milford, Nashua, Dover, Keene and Burlington - one of whom went to the U (well my sister also went, but got suspended her first semester for having a six-pack in her room and never went back).
The important part is the execution - can the funds be raised (I'm on board), and can they deliver the ROI? Those are fair questions, and I am equally concerned about the outcomes. But this isn't Gordon Haaland or Dale Freaking Nietschke at the helm.
To take shots at a person (ominous warnings of Presidents past - BTW, Huddleston has served longer than anyone but McConnell since WWII, in a MUCH less favorable environment) who has the best interests of the U at heart just doesn't make sense to me.
Greg - I really respect your posts... Just don't understand the snarkiness around Cowell/Huddleston. In concept, it would be awfully nice to add another cornerstone to the campus... IF (and I grant you it's a BIG if) we can execute. I hope we hear more details on the business case.