Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Two) - Managing Decreasing Expectations
Excellent post, Greg. I'm just going to cherry-pick a few points for comments, elaboration, etc.
* The "changing capacity of the Whitt" was one of BS35+3 *brightest* moments. I remember that well. Funny how when attendance falls, all of those "extras" suddenly disappear against the capacity number? Right up there with changing the playlist to carve out all the allegedly *offensive* songs, and then telling the band to play over (and the PA guy to rush through) the visitor's intros to save them from the withering "you $u@&" chant (oh, the horror
). Listen folks, I know I can be an insufferable gasbag at times, but there is no one - and I mean NO ONE - who takes a remotely close second place behind BS35+3 in the UNH Gasbag Sweepstakes (sorry, 'dc
).
* BC discount ticket promotions to youth programs, timed for semester breaks. Hardly rocket science, and pretty logical common sense driven approach. But our genius across the street has been occupied by more pressing matters, such as hardcore subversive/insensitive chants, and those *offensive* songs ... it's always good to know our guy has his priorities straight (happy now, 'dc?).
* I vividly remember Governor's Cup in the late '90's, and took the kids to a couple of them. I think the practical problem there was 3 of the participating teams at the time were HE teams (nowadays all 4 would be) so there would be extra NC games in the mix against HE foes. The schools (barring UNH and Lowell) were far removed from each other, and I believe the tourney format called for rotating home sites (IIRC I don't think they ever completed the full 4 site rotation?). An in-state "Riverstone" annually hosted at Manchester would not be dragged down by the overfamiliarity of the opposition like GC was, since the two D-1 teams (and then the lower division participants) would all be from difference conferences. The NH-based teams would be able to treat Manchester like a neutral site, just like the Garden works for the BP. Pretty much all of the schools would be within an hour of the site (MUCH closer if St. A's or SNHU participated). I'm not sure if there are restrictions for D-1 teams playing D-2/D-3 programs - other than PWR implications - but I'd LOVE to see this all happen.
* Agreed it will be fascinating to see which ways Souza decides to break away from his mentor's vision of the program - both on the ice and out in the community. That might be the most exciting, underplayed aspect of the coming changes.
While I generally agree with the tone of your post, just because Chuck doesn't have season tickets doesn't mean that he doesn't have a stake in the game. He's a fan, a much more loyal fan that several I come across in the arena every home game, so I do believe his opinion counts for something. But as a season ticket holder, my biggest complaint these days (and I am not alone on this) is how UNH offers discounted tickets for all available seats. Since you are also a season ticket holder, how do you feel when you sit down in your seat and find out that the guy next to you has picked up tickets for 2/3 the price you are paying? I know UNH has lowered season ticket prices over the years but, frankly, we are still treated as sheep just as we have ever since the Whit opened.
Regarding attendance, I went to the watered down media guide that the UNH issues now and found that that the top four Hockey East schools in terms of total attendance in all games were UConn, BC, Lowell, and UNH. As percentage of capacity, it was UVM (93%), Lowell (85%), UNH (83%) and Maine (81%). BC was at 67%, BU at 77% and UConn, because of an official capacity of 9,000 (it might be less when the cover the upper bowl), is 60%. And UNH's percentage is based on a capacity of 6,110. When the Whit opened, I believe the capacity was listed at just over 6,000. When Marty became AD, he had the capacity adjusted to 6,500 or so because, he told me, that is the way they do at Big Ten schools where every person in the building, including spectators and staff was to be included. Now it is 6,110. Maybe there are fewer folks working at the Whit these days? Regardless of all this, to be honest, these figures surprised me since my unsophisticated eyeball test always estimates the attendance lower than what is announced. But even if UNH is fudging the figures a bit, the fact that the program is still in the top 3 or 4 in attendance speaks to the interest in the Seacoast area for UNH Hockey.
That brings me to the missed opportunity department. 1932, you say that the marketing department does their best but, honestly, I beg to differ. While UNH routinely has youth hockey teams skate for 10 minutes between periods, I think that they could do more. When UNH plays at BC during semester break, I am always amazed at how many young kids are at the games. Turns out that BC promotes discounted tickets at times that the students are off campus and, ironically, these games usually produce some of the highest attendance figures of the year for BC. UNH should follow suit for two reasons. First you fill the seats and make more in concessions (these kids eat a lot of junk) and, second, you're building fan loyalty for the next generation.
I will not go on as Chuck has about how UNH is missing the mark by never promoting the program in the far reaches of the state but it's never too late to try. Years ago I talked to Umile about the idea of UNH conducting a few practices during the season in other parts of the state, maybe Manchester, Concord, Nashua to, you know, promote the team statewide. This is something Shawn Walsh did when he first got to Maine but, no surprise, the coach had no interest. I can understand that, he's focused on the team not the marketing. But wouldn't that be a great idea to follow through on?
BTW Chuck, we had a North Country version of the Beanpot - UNH, Maine, UVM, Lowell (the Governors Cup) for a few years before it faded. We also had the Blue/Green tournament, co-hosted by UNH and Dartmouth for several years, that faded as well. Priorities change over the years. I know Umile wanted to get away from playing Dartmouth during the holidays because he had his eyes on the bigger tournaments out west - GLI, Badger Showdown, etc. From what I gather, he now has less interest in doing that sort of thing. Since we are playing Maine twice the week between Christmas and New Years, maybe we can figure away to play somebody else during that time. Might be something Souza looks at once he takes over.
Excellent post, Greg. I'm just going to cherry-pick a few points for comments, elaboration, etc.
* The "changing capacity of the Whitt" was one of BS35+3 *brightest* moments. I remember that well. Funny how when attendance falls, all of those "extras" suddenly disappear against the capacity number? Right up there with changing the playlist to carve out all the allegedly *offensive* songs, and then telling the band to play over (and the PA guy to rush through) the visitor's intros to save them from the withering "you $u@&" chant (oh, the horror
* BC discount ticket promotions to youth programs, timed for semester breaks. Hardly rocket science, and pretty logical common sense driven approach. But our genius across the street has been occupied by more pressing matters, such as hardcore subversive/insensitive chants, and those *offensive* songs ... it's always good to know our guy has his priorities straight (happy now, 'dc?).
* I vividly remember Governor's Cup in the late '90's, and took the kids to a couple of them. I think the practical problem there was 3 of the participating teams at the time were HE teams (nowadays all 4 would be) so there would be extra NC games in the mix against HE foes. The schools (barring UNH and Lowell) were far removed from each other, and I believe the tourney format called for rotating home sites (IIRC I don't think they ever completed the full 4 site rotation?). An in-state "Riverstone" annually hosted at Manchester would not be dragged down by the overfamiliarity of the opposition like GC was, since the two D-1 teams (and then the lower division participants) would all be from difference conferences. The NH-based teams would be able to treat Manchester like a neutral site, just like the Garden works for the BP. Pretty much all of the schools would be within an hour of the site (MUCH closer if St. A's or SNHU participated). I'm not sure if there are restrictions for D-1 teams playing D-2/D-3 programs - other than PWR implications - but I'd LOVE to see this all happen.
* Agreed it will be fascinating to see which ways Souza decides to break away from his mentor's vision of the program - both on the ice and out in the community. That might be the most exciting, underplayed aspect of the coming changes.