Boy, we both look a little silly with the premature kudos to Coach Umile on getting the defense sorted out so quickly.
Didn't see the game, so I'm not qualified to pass too much judgment, but the "boom and bust" is likely going to be a fact of life for UNH this season - certainly in the early part of the season, and hopefully less often as the season plays out. I think we both agree there are winnable games just over the horizon for the next couple of weekends before things get tough again.
My point with Lowell at this stage of their program's development under Coach Bazin is that he has instilled not only a tough system to play against, but he has a total buy-in from his players, and they are drawing upon their successes of the past two seasons. Maybe it will fade, and maybe it will prove to be a Hellebuyck *thing* ... but instead what I see is a program that now has a distinct identity, and winning two straight HE Tourney trophies with uninspiring yet highly disciplined defensive hockey that gets stronger as the season plays out, and is darned near unbeatable in the postseason, will see new players immediately buying in to the credibility of the coach and his program. Honestly, none of us are likely ever going to look back at either of the last two UML teams and put them up with the all-time greats over the 30 years of Hockey East. But they are now at the point where success is breeding success, and in some ways they are a grittier version of the UNH teams that won back-to-backs just over a decade ago, and just never quite got over the hump at Nationals. But UML's shot is hardly spent yet.
Lowell stands at 5-1-1 after a challenging first month's schedule, and sits atop HE with an undefeated record, including a win over BC. The style may admittedly be unexciting (and even unimpressive at times), but it IS successful, and I think it would be foolish to rule out a return to the HE tourney title game for a 3rd straight season. Right now, these are the "good old days" in Lowell. Scary but very true.