2013hockeyfan
Active member
I think Nick Ring has shown major growth on both ends this season. Fitzgerald has looked good, as well. Lack of development remains the biggest knock on Souza as a coach, imo.The upperclassman haven't improved much.
I think Nick Ring has shown major growth on both ends this season. Fitzgerald has looked good, as well. Lack of development remains the biggest knock on Souza as a coach, imo.The upperclassman haven't improved much.
Any hat tricks?I predict that we defeat Dartmouth with a final score of 11-6. We go down 5-0 but come back on an 11-1 run for the win.
11 different scorers.Any hat tricks?
Welcome aboard, TL. You should be a good fit for this thread.
If Croteau (given up 4 goals in 5 games) starts in net for the Big Green, how many goals do the Cats score on him before Cashman replaces him with Clarke (given up 9 goals in 5 games)?11 different scorers.
Both goalies are going to be sidelined for the game with gingivitis.If Croteau (given up 4 goals in 5 games) starts in net for the Big Green, how many goals do the Cats score on him before Cashman replaces him with Clarke (given up 9 goals in 5 games)?
I think Nick Ring has shown major growth on both ends this season. Fitzgerald has looked good, as well. Lack of development remains the biggest knock on Souza as a coach, imo.
But if “lack of development remains the biggest knock on Souza,” how do you explain the improvements in Ring and Fitzgerald this season?I think Nick Ring has shown major growth on both ends this season. Fitzgerald has looked good, as well. Lack of development remains the biggest knock on Souza as a coach, imo.
Exception to the rule or, more hopefully, progress. I think that last season's team was the best example of his development challenges as a coach. Following the 20 win season had you seen development gains from key players, notably Devlin, Huard, and Jensen, that team would have been competitive in HE and nationwide. Instead, they regressed and you got the results we ended up with. I think the lack of production from Cy this season is a key data point.But if “lack of development remains the biggest knock on Souza,” how do you explain the improvements in Ring and Fitzgerald this season?
Agree! I guess you could say Robert Cronin was an exception given his production in his Senior year...Exception to the rule. I think that last season's team was the best example of his development challenges as a coach. Following the 20 win season had you seen development gains from key players, notably Devlin, Huard, and Jensen, that team would have been competitive in HE and nationwide. Instead, they regressed and you got the results we ended up with. I think the lack of production from Cy this season is a key data point.
My goodness ... MS7 goes on a 4 game heater, and potty turns him into our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. We've seen these blips of winning hockey before, so let's take a chill pill, as I've suggested elsewhere, and see if this (finally) turns out to be the real thing OR just the latest in a long line of disappointing mirages.A not so small factor in Souza's resurrection is the role of the CHL freshman and sophomore transfer. These guys have played a ton of hockey against men in the CHL. They are physically and mentally tough and have the wherewithal to play tough defensive minded hockey. Alfond Arena isn't a big deal to them. Not very sexy to watch always but effective. The new recruiting rules have been the difference for this years team.
The upperclassman haven't improved much. But I'm not going to go negative on the coaches today.
There is virtually NO counterpoint. Umile had literally dozens of his players pass through his program and go on to NHL careers that netted them pensions, not the 2-3 games and out variety that seems to feature nowadays, when a kid like Crookshank stands out because he's an injury call-up and spends 95% of his career in the AHL. And AC is the high water mark of the decade-long Souza Era. Kullen developed more in his fatefully short time than Souza has.The lack of development knock, which I support, has a counterpoint. 21 yr old freshman do not has the same development potential as an 18/19 year old. Famous Umile development stories include Saviano, Butler and Thompson. All were 19 year old freshman. Fitzgerald and Ring were 20 year old freshman. Maybe a bit more development juice to squeeze than the 21 year old.
Which means there is a counterpoint. Oh, Buford, you make us all chuckle.There is virtually NO counterpoint
The fact that you believe your incoherent ramblings constitute a record that other people are noting is laughable but also sad. You need to go downstairs to the basement and prepare for your imaginary nightly NESN interview.For the record, I think....
The word that you're reaching for like a small child reaching for candy on a top shelf of the kitchen is metaphor. It's pretty lofty language for a cavity filled person like yourself so I'll reach up, take it down and hand it to you.MS7 goes on a 4 game heater, and potty turns him into our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ
It's pretty lofty language for a cavity filled person like yourself so I'll reach up, take it down and hand it to you.
Buford, it's time for your afternoon nap.