What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Hockydad is predicting Union's Ric Bennett, a Springfield native, getting the UMass job. UNH better move fast.

Why on earth would Bennett leave a school where he not too long ago won a D-1 title to go to UMass?

It's not like Union is that much further away from Springfield than Amherst. And as a private, one would think Union would be able to easily compete on whatever salary UMass could offer.

And Schenectady certainly *feels* a lot more like home-sweet-home Springfield than Amherst does. :D

Curious. This will certainly be a test of hokydad's in-the-know prowess, 'cuz unless Bennett has run afoul of someone high up in the Union admin, this makes zero sense on the surface.
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Why on earth would Bennett leave a school where he not too long ago won a D-1 title to go to UMass?

It's not like Union is that much further away from Springfield than Amherst. And as a private, one would think Union would be able to easily compete on whatever salary UMass could offer.

And Schenectady certainly *feels* a lot more like home-sweet-home Springfield than Amherst does. :D

Curious. This will certainly be a test of hokydad's in-the-know prowess, 'cuz unless Bennett has run afoul of someone high up in the Union admin, this makes zero sense on the surface.
Or prove beyond a doubt that he is Ric Bennett.
 
Why on earth would Bennett leave a school where he not too long ago won a D-1 title to go to UMass?

It's not like Union is that much further away from Springfield than Amherst. And as a private, one would think Union would be able to easily compete on whatever salary UMass could offer.

And Schenectady certainly *feels* a lot more like home-sweet-home Springfield than Amherst does. :D

Curious. This will certainly be a test of hokydad's in-the-know prowess, 'cuz unless Bennett has run afoul of someone high up in the Union admin, this makes zero sense on the surface.[/QUOTE
Union has the advantage of no athletic scholarships, UMass has 18. No limit for Union in giving merit/ financial scholarships. Like the Ivy they're only limited to the kid getting in.
 
Curious. This will certainly be a test of hokydad's in-the-know prowess, 'cuz unless Bennett has run afoul of someone high up in the Union admin, this makes zero sense on the surface.[/QUOTE
Union has the advantage of no athletic scholarships, UMass has 18. No limit for Union in giving merit/ financial scholarships. Like the Ivy they're only limited to the kid getting in.

By rule, Ivy League schools can ONLY offer appropriate need based aid to student athletes. They're not swimming in merit money that they can hand out to anyone who is accepted. Any athletic or academic aid would be an egregious violation of Ivy League rules. I've spoken with many Ivy coaches and they all say the same thing - they're looking for really smart kids and they need them to be extremely rich or extremely poor...

I'm sure that Union is able to offer both financial and academic aid - but both have to legitimately earned. If it's not legitimate it's cheating. It isn't as easy as you claim it is to build a roster of 25 kids in that way. Union may even offer substantial aid - and have the majority of its students recieving some kind of aid, but it's not a cheap school.

I'm certain if you gave Rick Bennet a choice - no matter where he coached - he'd rather have 18 scholarships AND the ability to stack merit aid. He'd be a fool not too. He also just watched his old boss go to a struggling HE school and win a title.

I don't know what Bennett will do and I really don't care - but I assure you (like any good coach) he's not looking at UMass and thinking he CAN'T win there...
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Greg and all. Bomber did not state that UNH had more All-Americans, I did and I apologize to Bomber who seems to be a good and decent man. I probably should have sent my listing that lead to my incorrectly stating that Borek had more All-Americans.

I did not include the MA boys as McCloskey recruits and here is what I based All-American status on UNH listing.

McCloskey

Tim Murray- 1997
Mark Mowers- 1998
Jamie Filipowicz- 1999
Jason Krog- 1997, 1999
Ty Conklin- 2000, 2001
Darren Haydar- 2002
Colin Hemingway- 2002, 2003
Lenny Gare- 2003


Umile/Lassonde
Mike Ayers- 2003
Steve Saviano- 2004
Sean Collins- 2005
Brian Yandle- 2005, 2006

Borek
Trevor Smith- 2007
Brad Flaishans- 2008
Matt Fornataro- 2008
Mike Radja- 2008
Kevin Regan- 2008
Brian Foster- 2010
Blake Kessel- 2010, 2011
Bobby Butler- 2010
Paul Thompson- 2011
Trevor van Riemsdyk-2013

Maybes for Borek
Andrew Poturalski ?
Tyler Kelleher ?

All Americans if they played on winning teams
Kevin Goumas
Grayson Downing
Brett Pesce

Those in the Borek/Umile pipeline and on current team.

?????

I agree with Bomber that the talent level was very good under Borek and yes there was a good run of talent in the late 90's in recruiting. Add all those who de-committed and did not get through admissions. I am far from a genius at hockey and talent, but I presume others on the board do not have jobs as chief recruiter with 18 scholarships at Hockey East Schools. Bomber and Watcher follow college hockey closely and seem to have some insights others do not. I like seeing all the posts of who we should sign but there are only so many full scholarships and almost all Canadians require four years. If we are bringing in 2-4 Canadians that some of you seem to want, than be prepared for more walk-ons as well as we probably have quite a few already with full rides.

I agree with Dan that next year might be the breakout year and I am more optimistic of the following years as well. I agree with much of what Dan has posted but he is underestimating the skill sets of some of the players. BVR will be a very good college player and Salvaggio has first line talent with the right linemates. He is a goal scorer and just needs the opportunity to play with those who will free him up. Dan Correale was the fastest skater in hockey east this past year and was a first line player. It irks me that people can second guess that other options were better. He had a very good year. I love Eiserman on the ice and hope he is on one of the top 2 lines with PP time next year. Please know that UNH does not have an all-star team and has never had an all star team like many of our competitors.

I wish people would stop attacking Tirone's talent. He played magnificently for 85+% of his starts. He is a great goalie. Hockey East recognized his talents and he had many game stars throughout the year. He faced 140 + shots or so over the weekend and gave up 5 goals with breakaways and 5 on 3's. He had a couple of bad games. Kevin Regan had a few bad games in his day as well. Adam Clark is a very good goalie as well but please know that Umile sees Danny Tirone as his best current option. I know you are hoping Ken Dryden is walking through that door.

Enjoy the summer and I hope I see you all at the Whit this fall.
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

I like seeing all the posts of who we should sign but there are only so many full scholarships and almost all Canadians require four years. If we are bringing in 2-4 Canadians that some of you seem to want, than be prepared for more walk-ons as well as we probably have quite a few already with full rides.

Generally, you get what you pay for. The younger recruiting age makes the risk higher, but the alternative is to relegate yourself to the middle tier of HE. Frankly, I could not care any less about our fourth line. Get me walk ons like Cefalu, Bourque, Sacco, etc. Recruiting a marginal fourth liner like Kalinowski at the start of his junior season is ridiculous (presuming that early recruitment means he was offered some money). If you consider UNH slightly comparable to Denver, they go for top end kids from BC, and they do not focus on depth. They have mostly Canadians

I agree with Dan that next year might be the breakout year and I am more optimistic of the following years as well. I agree with much of what Dan has posted but he is underestimating the skill sets of some of the players. BVR will be a very good college player and Salvaggio has first line talent with the right linemates. He is a goal scorer and just needs the opportunity to play with those who will free him up.

Salvaggio?? He's a good 3rd liner, but he had 15 goals in his age 19 USHL season. Hardly a goal scorer.

Dan Correale was the fastest skater in hockey east this past year and was a first line player. It irks me that people can second guess that other options were better. He had a very good year.


If your proposition that Canadians require near full scholarships is true, I can't fathom spending it on a kid who had 39 points his 19 year season. He was not a failure by any means, but he never approached being an impact kid, and other than a hope that he was a late bloomer, his resume never suggested a lot of upside.


Please know that UNH does not have an all-star team and has never had an all star team like many of our competitors.

Que???? You mean this year??? You just listed all the All-Americans they've had, including the Hobey Baker winner. I worry that Souza's mentality is that UNH can't recruit skill, so build a big team that is hard to play against. That would be a sorry carry-over of Dick Umile's "hard working Boston suburbs) mantra. Dare to dream about becoming a target for Canadians who want to be part of a fast-skating, up tempo team. You think UNH can't compete with the big boys? U.Mass went to Calgary and got the top midget defenseman who became the AJHL rookie of the year. Getting there early has advantages. Sitting on the sidelines like UNH has done this year buys you time to evaluate players, but costs you the good players who want to commit early.

Stewie was not afraid to commit early, and had connections in the BC area when Merrimack allowed him to commit. Now, his results were somewhat mixed: top kid Austin Plevy, solid kid Laschyshyn, decent kid who got stolen (Wade Murphy) and kids who never panned out as expected, Braxton Bilous and Jace Hennig. Given the stronger UNH platform he would be able to do better.

You know how Union got good? They went for Albertan Dan Carr and skilled but underappreciated Mat Bodie.
You know how Quinnipiac got good? They went for BC's Jones twins and got a BC pipeline.

This isn't Brown or U.Conn, which were not coveted destinations. Set your sights higher.


UNH, Quality, not Quantity. Skill, not size.
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

I agree with Bomber that the talent level was very good under Borek and yes there was a good run of talent in the late 90's in recruiting. Add all those who de-committed and did not get through admissions. I am far from a genius at hockey and talent, but I presume others on the board do not have jobs as chief recruiter with 18 scholarships at Hockey East Schools. Bomber and Watcher follow college hockey closely and seem to have some insights others do not. I like seeing all the posts of who we should sign but there are only so many full scholarships and almost all Canadians require four years. If we are bringing in 2-4 Canadians that some of you seem to want, than be prepared for more walk-ons as well as we probably have quite a few already with full rides.

Borek was fine when he was recruiting off of a couple of FF appearances that were led by McCloskey recruits. As those FF's became more distant memories, he struggled. He gets ZERO credit for recruits that never played at UNH. The only people who take Borek's side in the recruiting debate are you and Bomber - and you are BOTH good men. But you are also the two posters who are close to Borek personally. I agree 100% with Watcher's argument. The program has no legitimate reason to settle and they should be out chasing the absolute best players they can find. Period.

Its extremely troubling to hear these continued laments about the hardships UNH faces to attract anyone from people who are so connected to the coaching staff. Borek, and seemingly Souza, don't seem to think much about what UNH has to offer recruits and that's a problem...

Finally, this is the last time I'll mention this because I don't feel good when I do - but I AM a recruiting coordinator for NCAA athletics. I know how hard it can be, but I also know that if you don't believe in your school/program you're ***. You won't get anyone. And then you'll start coming up with all kinds of reasons why you can't compete - when what you really need to do is look in the mirror and adjust your attitude...

UNH can build a great roster, once the recruiters start to actively believe in UNH as a destination and start to pursue recruits aggressively with enthusiasm. It really is that simple when you boil it down...

I agree with Dan that next year might be the breakout year and I am more optimistic of the following years as well. I agree with much of what Dan has posted but he is underestimating the skill sets of some of the players. BVR will be a very good college player and Salvaggio has first line talent with the right linemates. He is a goal scorer and just needs the opportunity to play with those who will free him up. Dan Correale was the fastest skater in hockey east this past year and was a first line player. It irks me that people can second guess that other options were better. He had a very good year. I love Eiserman on the ice and hope he is on one of the top 2 lines with PP time next year.

I consider myself to be a pretty objective poster - I'll let it be known when I'm high on a player or optimistic about the upcoming season, but I'll also analyze what I see in front of me (with a lot of information to back it up). Correale had three goals as a freshman, four as a sophomore and four as a junior (despite playing most, if not all, of the season with Downing and Willows). That's 11 goals entering his senior season - where he exploded for 16 playing alongside two of the most purely, offensively gifted players in UNH history. You don't think that's a coincidence do you? In my opinion Eiserman is simply just a better player - much more talented, with better hands, more size and plenty fast - the line will be better next year because of his presence.

I hope you're right about BVR - I''m sure he'll be a good college player. He's a VR. I'm just not sure he'll be an impact player as a freshman.

I wish people would stop attacking Tirone's talent. He played magnificently for 85+% of his starts. He is a great goalie. Hockey East recognized his talents and he had many game stars throughout the year. He faced 140 + shots or so over the weekend and gave up 5 goals with breakaways and 5 on 3's. He had a couple of bad games. Kevin Regan had a few bad games in his day as well. Adam Clark is a very good goalie as well but please know that Umile sees Danny Tirone as his best current option. I know you are hoping Ken Dryden is walking through that door.

There is nothing Tirone did this year that raises him above criticism. He struggled. I don't know how anyone can argue that. He gave up a ton of goals because he was out of position and a lot of shots just snuck right through him. He played well this weekend at MC - but I stand 100% by my analysis of the Warriors offensive attack. If they had been able to handle passes in front of the net or hit open corners they would have swept this series by scores of 8-2 and 9-2. They pummeled the 'N' on Tirone's chest, missed the net, fumbled pucks and quite frankly, their finishing was BRUTAL.

Tirone was 64th in goals against average and 52nd in save percentage. We're all quick to blame the defense, but he let down his blueliners just as often as they let him down this season. He may get the starting job handed to him, but he certainly doesn't deserve to have it gift-wrapped for him. He had more than a few bad games. I'd counter your 85% magnificent with at least 50% below average.

Hopefully, he comes back next season and shoves this post down my throat. But, I don't care who the goalie is - someone needs only to be league average and UNH will be in a great position. Umile should be experienced enough as a coach to not care who that goalie is. Strip the names off their backs and play the best one...

As far as the stars of the game awards - they're meaningless. At best its two SID's and a couple of reporters voting on these awards. More often than not its just the home SID. So-and-so has a couple of goals, so-and-so made X amount of saves, so-and-so is our best player and had an assist. There is little to no analysis into who actually played well or impacted the game...
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

BTW, 18 scholarships would yield you your top 9 forwards, your top 4 defensemen and two goaltenders with THREE full rides to spare. Split those last three full rides in half and you can pick up three more forwards, your third defensive pair and your third goalie on 50% rides. Add a few walk-ons and you've got yourself a team!

In other words, spend some full rides and get some kids in here with real ability - it won't kill the rest of your roster...
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Question: do we have factual evidence that our coaching staff is ISN'T out chasing top talent? This gets mentioned a lot and I'm having a hard time believing that they aren't and also have no belief in the school (UNH) they represent. How do we know this to be true by current recruiting results?This is not meant to be an attack on anyone I just am one of those people who need cold hard facts.
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Question: do we have factual evidence that our coaching staff is ISN'T out chasing top talent? This gets mentioned a lot and I'm having a hard time believing that they aren't and also have no belief in the school (UNH) they represent. How do we know this to be true by current recruiting results?This is not meant to be an attack on anyone I just am one of those people who need cold hard facts.

No, we don't - at least I don't - have factual evidence, but there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence. First of all, when you hear the same issues being brought up over and over by posters extremely close to the recruiters it makes one wonder where they're getting these opinions. We can't recruit because of admissions, were not in Boston, we have an Olympic rink, we're not a destination school, our locker room isn't nice enough, etc. These are all superficial and insignificant arguments to the effective recruiter. Perhaps, these opinions are exclusively theirs - or their attempt to explain the recruiters lack of production - but I can't help but think they're hearing it from somewhere/someone...

Second, you just look at the players that ARE being brought to UNH. As Watcher has pointed out and as we've seen on the ice, regularly, there are lots of hard-working role players getting offered and offered early. That sheds some light onto the recruiting philosophies of the people responsible. They might be out there chasing all of the players we'd like to see them target, but it doesn't show in terms of the player profile they're actually landing. As well as the extremely slow rate of recruiting news.

Would it be better for them to be out there targeting top kids, but losing every single recruiting battle or having kids put them on the back burner while they wait for something else? That would be a major concern as well and you'd have to start to wonder why they're losing these battles. Or what their recruiting sales pitch projects. Either way, it doesn't add up to much in the way of excitement or optimism for the Souza era just yet...
 
Last edited:
No, we don't - at least I don't - have factual evidence, but there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence. First of all, when you hear the same issues being brought up over and over by posters extremely close to the recruiters it makes one wonder where they're getting these opinions. We can't recruit because of admissions, were not in Boston, we have an Olympic rink, we're not a destination school, our locker room isn't nice enough, etc. These are all superficial and insignificant arguments to the effective recruiter. Perhaps, these opinions are exclusively theirs - or their attempt to explain the recruiters lack of production - but I can't help but think they're hearing it from somewhere/someone...

Second, you just look at the players that ARE being brought to UNH. As Watcher has pointed out and as we've seen on the ice, regularly, there are lots of hard-working role players getting offered and offered early. That sheds some light onto the recruiting philosophies of the people responsible. They might be out there chasing all of the players we'd like to see them target, but it doesn't show in terms of the player profile they're actually landing. As well as the extremely slow rate of recruiting news.

Would it be better for them to be out there targeting top kids, but losing every single recruiting battle or having kids put them on the back burner while they wait for something else? That would be a major concern as well and you'd have to start to wonder why they're losing these battles. Or what their recruiting sales pitch projects. Either way, it doesn't add up to much in the way of excitement or optimism for the Souza era just yet...

Thanks Dan for your speedy response pretty much the way I imagined basically taking a look at current results has to speak volumes. Do you personally believe UNH can and more importantly should..be landing these top dawgs? Now that our season is over surely hope/expect we hear encouraging news. I noticed you put Joe Sacco with scoring 0 points for next year...think he won't make much impact or will he be a Cefalu sitting in the stands waiting his turn?
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Question: do we have factual evidence that our coaching staff is ISN'T out chasing top talent?

Just to eccho Dan, we have no evidence. We have only fear, borne of Mike Souza's lack of any compelling resume that we can bank on, and that he is very close to the "Umile school" which in my mind unfortunately is not a plus. This is not a young head coach e.g. Gadowsky to Penn State, when you knew his results at Princeton. This is not even a longer term assistant coach, e.g., Darren Yopyk, from Merrimack, who had a recruiting profile and BCHL pipeline. You have Souza who has 2 years at Brown with limited recruiting responsibilities and a very defensive oriented coach, and 2 years at U.Conn, only one at the HE level, with few tangible results on the recruiting side. (I will credit him with Thompson, a late blooming big winger, and possible first rounder.)

Prehaps unrealistic expectations, but UNH has a 10 member 2018 class, meaning the class should be filled mostly with 1999s, a few top end 2000s. But we do know that most of the top US 2000, 1999s and all top 1998s are gone. The 2001s are starting to go. UNH has recruited very minimally, getting only one 99. No Canadians. So we scratch our heads and worry.

Nothing a skilled recruit or two or three won't change. Let's see if Cam Hillis is just playing the NCAA card for the OHL, and if UNH is even on his dance card. Let's see if Souza's buddy Barker can do him a solid with J. Cameron. Let's see if Stewart has Western Canadian connections to bring us Blackburn's teammate Harrison, or Alberta's Mitchell (who BC seems might be after.) Or if Souza or Stewart are optortunistic, like getting Makar when he becomes available (sort of like BU getting Fortunato when he couldn't get into Harvard).
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Just to eccho Dan, we have no evidence. We have only fear, borne of Mike Souza's lack of any compelling resume that we can bank on, and that he is very close to the "Umile school." This is not a young head coach e.g. Gadowsky to Penn State, when you knew his results at Princeton. This is not even a longer term assistant coach, e.g., Darren Yopyk, from Merrimack, who had a recruiting profile and BCHL pipeline. You have Souza who has 2 years at Brown with limited recruiting responsibilities and a very defensive oriented coach, and 2 years at U.Conn, only one at the HE level, with few tangible results on the recruiting side. (I will credit him with Thompson, a late blooming big winger, and possible first rounder.)

Prehaps unrealistic expectations, but UNH has a 10 member 2018 class, meaning the class should be filled mostly with 1999s, a few top end 2000s. But we do know that most of the top US 2000, 1999s and all top 1998s are gone. The 2001s are starting to go. UNH has recruited very minimally, getting only one 99. So we scratch our heads and worry.

Nothing a skilled recruit or two or three won't change.

Guess that's what we all are looking at, who's gonna fill those slots, and, are they going to be quality kids with skill. I hold out hope that UNH is indeed 'going for' those great players you guys put links out on...maybe we are going after them but for lack of a better term, they ain't biting...hence the low numbers. Is there a usual time of the year when this all goes down, are we closing in on that time when it's getting very slim as you mention? (Being that many/all of the top recruits in their respective age classes are all gone)
 
No, we don't - at least I don't - have factual evidence, but there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence. First of all, when you hear the same issues being brought up over and over by posters extremely close to the recruiters it makes one wonder where they're getting these opinions. We can't recruit because of admissions, were not in Boston, we have an Olympic rink, we're not a destination school, our locker room isn't nice enough, etc. These are all superficial and insignificant arguments to the effective recruiter. Perhaps, these opinions are exclusively theirs - or their attempt to explain the recruiters lack of production - but I can't help but think they're hearing it from somewhere/someone...

All I will add is that I don't hear any of these excuses. Are SOME of these issues real, yes they probably are (admissions, some facilities), but are they excuses that are being used as a crutch, no, not in my opinion.
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Thanks Dan for your speedy response pretty much the way I imagined basically taking a look at current results has to speak volumes. Do you personally believe UNH can and more importantly should..be landing these top dawgs? Now that our season is over surely hope/expect we hear encouraging news. I noticed you put Joe Sacco with scoring 0 points for next year...think he won't make much impact or will he be a Cefalu sitting in the stands waiting his turn?

Yes, I personally think that UNH can compete for recruits with anyone. The school and the program offer a tremendous package. There are still some high-end kids left and there are plenty of very good recruits they could target - but they have to be aggressive and act quickly. The talent is out there to put together a team that gets UNH back to prominence. Can they find it? Can they land it? We'll see..

As for Sacco, he's a late add to replace Bourque and Kalinowski - which I think is a net positive for UNH. He's not a bad player by any means, but he won't be a high scoring forward and there are a lot of forwards already competing to round out the third and fourth lines next season. I think he is more than capable of playing a bottom six role down the road - and playing it well. At this point, I don't expect him to make much of an impact NEXT season, but I would have said the same thing about Miller last year (he was OK, but definitely played a lot more than I would have expected and you have to love his effort)...

---

To CatsFan1983 - that's good to hear. I'd love to be proven wrong and I hope its all in my head...
 
Last edited:
To CatsFan1983 - that's good to hear. I'd love to be proven wrong and I hope its all in my head...

Dan, you have plenty of points that are legit, sometimes a little over the top though 😀

There are things that can be changed asap that have nothing to do with the head coaching position that would have an immediate impact on the program in a positive way. Are they aware of these issues (issues is a strong word because it's not anything bad) I believe they are. Will they make the right call and handle it, I don't know, I guess we'll find out.
 
Question: do we have factual evidence that our coaching staff is ISN'T out chasing top talent? This gets mentioned a lot and I'm having a hard time believing that they aren't and also have no belief in the school (UNH) they represent. How do we know this to be true by current recruiting results?This is not meant to be an attack on anyone I just am one of those people who need cold hard facts.


They're out there without a doubt! If nothing else it's probably easier to be away from here right now. I think they'll be better next year regardless, even if they had this team again. They took a major hit this year and I think the team and staff were on the ropes for the off season and into early part of the season. UNH went from 44 yeArs of recruiting to 18 years excluding the HC. While in that initial termoil and transition they're having defections and advisors calling to see what is the status of their advisee. With one face as the franchise what do you expect? That face leaves and the family, recruit and advisor's connection to UNH is gone. I think by the time they were able to come up for air they're already struggling.
They were unsettled in the back end with injuries and no confidence(for whatever reason). They quit on a couple kids, one with huge upside leaves and the other all but rots in 108. I'll always question how that d corp dropped so dramatically. Yes they lost a stud, but even if BP is out there for 30 minutes a night that still leaves 30 minutes he isn't. When TVR left there wasn't a huge drop off. I'll admit BP really flourished when TVR broke his leg, he became the guy before he became the guy officially. Nontheless the core was still there, was it coaching , confidence, communication?
They will be better next year, it's down the road that's concerning. I have stated here ad nausea that the downfall was a manpower(staff) issue, and has been for years.
I'm still putting the AD on the clock. He needs to do it now! Let MS have the swagger of HC out there now! In a couple years UNH could be UMaine or UMASS. They went to the Garden last year knocking off a hot team that went on to the national championship. 2 more years of finishing in the lower half with no expectations of making it to the NCAAs or Garden for a shot at NCAAs will put a major hurt on the program. Marty I hold you accountable for where this storied program goes.
 
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

All I will add is that I don't hear any of these excuses. Are SOME of these issues real, yes they probably are (admissions, some facilities), but are they excuses that are being used as a crutch, no, not in my opinion.

Denying Joseph Masonius - 6 Goals, 15 Assists; #105 North American Skater on NHL CSS Midterm rankings - admissions at the end of June, 2015 was inexcusable. UConn accepted him in a matter of days. He obviously was worthy of an athletic scholarship based on his grades and test results.
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

Dan

I know you mean well and I am happy you are a diehard UNH fan like I am through and through. I attended all but one game this year and saw each game first hand not on some internet feed and I know each player on the team and all of the coaching staff and they all have a very different view of Danny Tirone than you and most of the others on this board. All goalies have some bad games and Danny is no different. Were you at the games at Merrimack? Maine? BU? VT? etc. If you are in Denver and work for DU (not Dick Umile) hockey, you would probably know that 15 full rides leaves a lot of walk on athletes as there are generally 25-30 players on each D 1 team in hockey. There are usually 2-4 players with serious injuries each year. Denver has a recruiting advantage as they are a western school where every Western Canadian wants to go (CA kids too) as is North Dakota. I think you should call Mike Souza on the phone if you have all these inside scoops on all of these amazing players that he should be recruiting. I am certain he will listen to you and if you are a great recruiter and talent evaluation expert, he might find a position for you when he becomes head coach. Kevin Regan is not walking through that door anytime soon and we will have junior and senior defensemen this year and they generally improve with age.

I have seen the flaws of our team and most other teams we play against. We have been very competitive all year (other than the Northeastern and MSU series). Lighten up or stop rooting for UNH as many of the posters would be better served by choosing another college hockey team. Mike Souza will turn the boat around. Maybe NCAA Watcher is Mike Souza and he is just bad mouthing himself to get the marginal haters away from UNH. I wish we had teams like 1998-99 2002-2003 and 2007-2008 (the best regular season team we ever had) and I have long term friends that played on all of these teams. If Watcher and Dan could take over the team for the next few years, I would be hoping that you could turn the boat around. Mike Souza isn't spending his whole day looking at websites, he is coaching and finding the players that fit into the UNH system. It takes all types to make up a team as UNH has never had all star teams for every line or pairing. Please try to bring some positives to the conversation. I agree with Bomber (and I do not know him or her) that we will be better next year regardless and that the deck is clear for Mike Souza to build a roster for two years from now.

Thanks to all for interesting information all season. I am going to take the summer off from this board so I can be optimistic for the 2016-2017 season. Please keep the Umile hating to a minimum if that is possible and give Mike Souza a chance to succeed without second guessing every little move or non-move he makes. He will be the difference maker in the living rooms as he will be better with kids than Jerry York and all others. It makes a big difference when you are recruiting for yourself as head coach.

Be well!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top